There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
how many gravies today?
d fitz
cleary
angus
george b
millman
lydia
etc etc
d fitz
cleary
angus
george b
millman
lydia
etc etc
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 25
|
By:
chris dixon
|
|
By:
cleary wins the fashion show NAP
|
|
By:
big personality deserves a big shirt!
 |
|
By:
Martin dixon surely
|
|
By:
was it?
 |
|
By:
Martin Dixon's top half, Chris's bottom half.
|
|
By:
Nick Luck as master of ceremonies
|
|
By:
Chris would have been down in the town HIT
|
|
By:
i see. I was switching to the tennis between races.
|
|
By:
Dont blame you
|
|
By:
lightfoot and some other dude bring up at least 10 today
|
|
By:
mark milligan
|
|
By:
ah yes, cheers
|
|
By:
can't David Factexactly shut up about that shirt ...
|
|
By:
the boy in studio couldn't call a photo in which you would not have bet the second at ten thousand to one
|
|
By:
No point complaining as all of the lemmings are paying their £290 a year to keep it going
|
|
By:
£155.88, Bargain
tar |
|
By:
When will Dixon bro 3 board the train?
|
|
By:
Scott's got his training and fashion careers to think about.
|
|
By:
But back to the subject of today's pundits and their friends. James Millman, I wasn't listening to everything he said, but I sort picked up that he was saying there was a rail bias at Carlisle, and I think he gave Dizzy G as a case in point, BUT, there were only 5 runners and they were all towards the far side and she actually came away from the inside.
Now what made me think he might have been talking shyte was the 4.25 race, where Billy Dylan and Pea Shooter both went into the race in reasonable form and fair to say they had place chances, but having stuck to the inside rail, it was as if they were trying to run through treacle compared to those racing away from the rail. I'll report back once I've had the chance to review the card in full. |
|
By:
What I don't understand is how these tiny viewership channels can afford to pay so many people, I mean how?
|
|
By:
Stu, it's certainly different to how it use to be. I remember back in the day when the on course pundit also had to cover an away meeting. Jeez they had it tough in them days!
I sometimes wonder if they have a mysterious benefactor, like some billionaire from the middle east who just loves having all these pundits on, or if it's the bookies 'powering' their coverage who insist on having them on and foot the bill! Racing UK, Returning Profits to... [answers on a postcard please} |
|
By:
Could be the amount of bookie sponsership yep George - the other 'blight' on the coverage....oh goodie, lets listen to sum filth from one of the firms telling us all about the betting.....
|
|
By:
*some (freudian slip, lol)
|
|
By:
What I don't understand is how these tiny viewership channels can afford to pay so many people, I mean how?
EXACTLY |