they probably won't change it but by allowing it to stand the British racing authority continue to promote a win at all costs culture. A ban or fine will mean nothing to Murphy compared to the value of winning a prestigious race like the Eclipse.
Another example in this race following Al Kazeem a few years back when Hanagan was fortunate not to be put through the rail, costing him second place (at least imo)
they probably won't change it but by allowing it to stand the British racing authority continue to promote a win at all costs culture. A ban or fine will mean nothing to Murphy compared to the value of winning a prestigious race like the Eclipse.Anot
They're sending a clear message to jockeys, you may get a fine or a ban, but you're free to whip your mount across the track. We will still let you keep the race.
They're sending a clear message to jockeys, you may get a fine or a ban, but you're free to whip your mount across the track. We will still let you keep the race.
Why do the stewards have to interview the jockeys? It's bleedin obvious what occurred from the video. It should take about 30 seconds to make a decision. Only in Britain!
Why do the stewards have to interview the jockeys? It's bleedin obvious what occurred from the video. It should take about 30 seconds to make a decision. Only in Britain!
roggrain 07 Jul 18 14:28 Why do the stewards have to interview the jockeys? It's bleedin obvious what occurred from the video. It should take about 30 seconds to make a decision. Only in Britain!
correct..embarrassing.
roggrain 07 Jul 18 14:28 Why do the stewards have to interview the jockeys? It's bleedin obvious what occurred from the video. It should take about 30 seconds to make a decision. Only in Britain!correct..embarrassing.