happened last stride but FPP caused 2nd's back end to be clouted...if you win an inch and cause any interference, dont think you can have many complaints at being chucked
happened last stride but FPP caused 2nd's back end to be clouted...if you win an inch and cause any interference, dont think you can have many complaints at being chucked
If you look at the shadow of the winning post on the grass on the side on ...the end of it finishes about a yard from the winning line - the seconds back end was taken away at least a yard before this on the head on
Not that i think it effected the result...
If you look at the shadow of the winning post on the grass on the side on ...the end of it finishes about a yard from the winning line - the seconds back end was taken away at least a yard before this on the head on Not that i think it effected the r
not sure how you can be so certain that a horse getting back-end knocked sidewards def didnt cost it a nose...i suspect it didnt but certainly couldnt be certain...fair enough to give benefit of doubt to non-aggressor imo
not sure how you can be so certain that a horse getting back-end knocked sidewards def didnt cost it a nose...i suspect it didnt but certainly couldnt be certain...fair enough to give benefit of doubt to non-aggressor imo
Duncan - "if you win an inch and cause any interference, dont think you can have many complaints at being chucked". You absolutely have cause for complaint because that does not represent the rule. Was there interference, Yes, Did the winner improved its position - ie would it have finished behind the second. No, because the winner did not interfere with the second horse. Simple really.
Duncan - "if you win an inch and cause any interference, dont think you can have many complaints at being chucked". You absolutely have cause for complaint because that does not represent the rule. Was there interference, Yes, Did the winner imp
I agree absolutely with dyno, I think it is pretty sure to be reversed. The problem here, is as we have covered several times that the rules are unclear in the guidance it gives to stewards on consequential (second-hand) interference.
For clarity, if they think that in these circumstances the miscreant should be disqualified, the need to state in the rules, that if in the opinion of the stewards, the interference caused whether directly or indirectly caused the winner to improve his position etc etc etc
I agree absolutely with dyno, I think it is pretty sure to be reversed. The problem here, is as we have covered several times that the rules are unclear in the guidance it gives to stewards on consequential (second-hand) interference. For clarity, i
Willie Shafter. 14 May 18 16:48 i say stands..happened as crossed line..didnt effect result.
tomhunt 14 May 18 17:35 what happened you lose the lot on the 2nd, you were so sure it would keep it
now you're making a tit of yourself.
Willie Shafter. 14 May 18 16:48 i say stands..happened as crossed line..didnt effect result.tomhunt 14 May 18 17:35 what happened you lose the lot on the 2nd, you were so sure it would keep itnow you're making a tit of yourself.
listen i'll spell it out so you don't embarress yourself even more
you are going on about the inteference on the line between 1st and 2nd
it wasn't about that, it was about this:
2nd's backend went sideways well before the line by the 4th hitting it
you really are a dopey coont
listen i'll spell it out so you don't embarress yourself even moreyou are going on about the inteference on the line between 1st and 2ndit wasn't about that, it was about this:2nd's backend went sideways well before the line by the 4th hitting ityou
Yes Howard:Horse Racing > Catt 14th May : 6f Hcap Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Selections Selection Odds Stake(£) Bid type Placed Profit/loss(£) Crosse Fire 20.00 2.00 Back 14-May-18 16:41 -2.00 Crosse Fire 5.00 44.00 Lay 14-May-18 16:41 44.00 *Average odds: On Off Back subtotal: -2.00 Lay subtotal: 44.00 Market subtotal: 42.00 Commission @ 4%: 1.68 Net Market Total: 40.32
Profit and Loss is shown net of commission. All times are UKT ? unless otherwise stated.
But im not sure what that has to do with the price of fish!
Yes Howard:Horse Racing > Catt 14th May : 6f Hcap Showing 1 - 2 of 2 SelectionsSelection Odds Stake(£) Bid type Placed Profit/loss(£)Crosse Fire 20.00 2.00 Back 14-May-18 16:41 -2.00Crosse Fire 5.00 44.00 L
of course it effected the result, extrasolar hampered the 4th who in turn smashed spirit's hind quarters sideways
what don't you understand about that, you didn't spot it did you
you need a telescope
of course it effected the result, extrasolar hampered the 4th who in turn smashed spirit's hind quarters sidewayswhat don't you understand about that, you didn't spot it did youyou need a telescope
howard Joined: 09 Mar 03 Replies: 6243 14 May 18 16:47 martin is wrong. just before the line. should be thrown out
shafty also agreed with martin, martin was wrong too
if you're gonna quote somebody quote everythinghoward Joined: 09 Mar 03Replies: 6243 14 May 18 16:47 martin is wrong. just before the line. should be thrown outshafty also agreed with martin, martin was wrong too