winners weight cloth fell off chelt

Re: Exchange.

Betfair Help
‏
Verified account

@BetfairCS
Following
Following @BetfairCS

More
Replying to @NudgeXS @Faldo777
For the time being this is still being looked into.

It's not just on sportsbook they just took 120 off my balance and I cashed out as well which stinks

And mow they have just put it back in unbelievable seens

Layed 16.5 during the enquiry. Voided.

Stevie in panick mode

Theyve settled the marked without the bets in the "stewards"

what were the prices in the stewards market ?

Only prices I noticed were around 16.5 to 17.5, but I didn't pay lots of attention. It was around 4.3 over the line.

1.1 to 1.2 then back into 1.1ish then to 1.06 on suspend

GB / Chelt 4th May / 19:50 4m Hunt Chs     Battle Dust     Lay     124459344101     04-May-18
20:09           C     16     20.00           16    
-

Went to 25 just after that

Strange paid me out on my lay of the winner as well

Barry
‏


@Faldo777
8m
8 minutes ago


More
@Betfair what's happening with battle dust 19:50 Cheltenham on the exchange?
1 reply .
0 retweets
0 likes

Reply
1 
Retweet

Like

Direct message


Betfair Help
‏
Verified account

@BetfairCS
7m
7 minutes ago


More
Hi there.Thanks for getting in touch. Battledust will be paid.
2 replies .
0 retweets
0 likes

Reply
2 
Retweet

Like

Direct message


Barry
‏


@Faldo777
2m
2 minutes ago


More
Well it's just been settled as a losing bet???
1 reply .
0 retweets
0 likes

Reply
1 
Retweet

Like

Direct message

Betfair Help
‏
Verified account

@BetfairCS
Following
Following @BetfairCS

More
Replying to @Faldo777
Let me speak to our team with regards to this.
8:47 pm - 4 May 2018

Looks like either this still has some legs, or Betfair giving out wrong advice on Twitter.

thanks, 1.1 must have been a gift let alone 1.2

willie, did you have a bet on the stewards ?

Just checked with my Scottish contacts, no shop cleaned out today. There was a mug punter done his bollox again, they know him as 'Herr Loss' or 'Woody'

Betfair saying they have voided the bets on the Stewards

indeed they did

Happen to know the reason Elise

i'm going to guess that because it's a clerks objection, from memory i can't ever recall one not being dq'd once called so in effect they will say you were betting on something that was a done deal

just a guess tho

don't recall bf voiding one though previously if they had opened a stewards in this type of situation either tho

Didn't Shane Kelly survive a clerk of Scales objection last year?

Cheers, appreciate the explanation. Ive just contacted Betfair and all they did was say they have the right to Void a bet. But no explanation as to why

i don't remember it sparrow, sorry

but what happen if jockey was 11s 12lb and was within the limit you would have lost, the market was reopened by bet fair and ppl risked money on the market

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/jul/25/stewards-not-disqualify-jockey-light

not quite the same i know

thing is, you could argue that the fptp was a likely dq, but what if they hadn't thrown it out, what would bf have done then?

in theory you can't bet on those in future because you don't know what their rules are

sry tony was typing the same thing when you'd already posted

Absolutely

i missed that dealer thanks, just confuses the issue further when bf play god

you could have lost but could never have won thats wrong

interesting to see if we get a proper explanation

We're not worthy of explanations.

this there reply

In the interests of fairness and integrity,  all bets placed during the enquiry will be voided. The following rule applies in this case:
''Betfair may, in its sole and absolute discretion, decide to suspend betting on a market at any time (even if such suspension is earlier than anticipated by the Exchange Rules). In the interests of maintaining integrity and fairness in the markets, Betfair may also void certain bets in a market or void a whole market in its entirety.''

integrity - they allow laying fallers

exactly the same as laying a horse that had fallen imo

no it isn't

you cannot lose laying horses who have fallen (since remounting was not allowed)

laying horses who appear to have lost equipment does not mean a guaranteed winner

if you search for a horse called plus jamais and watch a run at ayr on 31/10/15

there's bits of tack flying off all the way up the straight, looks a certain DQ

but the jockey weighed in within the allowable parameters, he carried the saddle in his hand jumping the last (with the weight cloth inside)

fixed weight cloths that cant lose weight

anyone can see falling tack but very few falling weights

this is my take on this...

i like everyone seen what looked like the weight cloth fall off before 2 out...

i bet the 2nd after the last...now 20 secs after the race the betting re-opened..i said to the lads in the box,why has it re-opened when the clerk of the scales hasnt objected? i then bet the 2nd and laid the 3rd...then even when there is an objection by the clerk of the scales bf dont re-open the market.

the simple facts are..bf should never have re-opened the market.

betfair need to clarify this situation for further instances

they never open a stewards for a weight discretion or a wrong course scenario.

Well they did tonight!

ohh right , so it was a mistake on betfairs behalf because they thought it was a stewards enquiry ?

was a stewards enquiry called or did the clerk of the scales object , or , would a stewards enquiry be called if the COTS objects ?

All there was on RUK was Stewards Enquiry at the foot of the screen, then they fcked off to The Betting Lab.

if the COTS objects , does this trigger a stewards enquiry ?

i can't remember how it works now

Yes, that's what usually happens, but tonight they just sounded the klaxon and announced Stewards Enquiry. Then RUK left Cheltenham and returned to Potato Head's Betting Lab.

The Clerk of the Scales objected to the winner BATTLE DUST (IRE), ridden by Mr Alex Edwards and trained by Philip Rowley, on the grounds of the rider weighing in at 11 stone 1 lb having weighed out at 11 stone 13 lbs. BATTLE DUST (IRE) was disqualified and the placings were revised as follows: First, EXCITABLE ISLAND (IRE), Second, MON PARRAIN (FR), third, AL CO (FR) and fourth, RICHMOND (FR). The rider and the Clerk of the Scales were interviewed. The Stewards were satisfied that Mr Edwards weighed in light as he had lost his weight cloth at the top of the hill on the final circuit.

very strnge scenario if the klaxon sounded for a stewards inquiry before this was triggered by an objection by the clerk of the scales.

on the odd occasion a jockey and a trainer can fall out and the jockey fails to weigh in,the clerk informs the stewards who then act,the clerk must object if a jockey fails to weigh in for the stewards to act.i know this is not the same situation but it might help.

brassneck    Joined: 13 Feb 03
Replies: 11793 05 May 18 00:05 
on the odd occasion a jockey and a trainer can fall out and the jockey fails to weigh in

clarification needed please.

the clerk of the scales makes objections if a jockey fails to weigh in,it happens a lot (usually for minor places)then the stewards disqualify the horse.
jockeys and trainers can argue like everyone else,and feck each other off usually trainer telling jockey he did not ride to instructions,and the jockey will say feck off and he will not bother weighing in after the race.

dc

exactly

fckin idiot

there has to be an enquiry because the stewards have find out why a jockey fails to weigh in,are you alright Willie i was forty years behind a bookie counter and if i had a quid for every time i heard the girl on the extel saying" hold the result at (what ever meeting)""details to follow"",CLERK OF THE COURSE OBJECTS TO 3RD PLACE HORSE (MURPHY'S WHEELS)because the jockey has failed to weigh in,awaiting announcement,3rd horse MURPHY WHEELS HAS BEEN DISQUALIFIED AND PLASED LAST,JOCKEY HAS FAILED TO WEIGH IN.
STEWARDS HAVE CORRECTED THE RESULT.REPEAT ANNOUNCEMENT ,HOLD THE RESULT,A REPEAT ANNOUNCEMENT details to follow ,message to all bookmakers,
and she would go on and on an on for a fecking hour,

holy mother of god do you guys not know the rules of racing,i cant believe what i am reading,how on earth did you end up on a gambling site,its unbelievable .
the best i ever heard in my whole life,guys working for betfair and dont know rules of racing

.

IS THE WORLDS GREATEST POASTER BACK

???????????????????????????????????

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

if memory serves brassneck was a multi millionaire with no need to work.next thig hes on chit chat moaning about work.

no smileys required

thats the best laugh i had in ages,[:laugh:
i real belly laugh with my shoulders bouncing up and down.

pooing outside his static caravan type imo

but im not laughing

self employed of course,i say i had my first bookie office before you were born,when you did not know that a jockey had to weigh in after a race it beats all.

i was born in 1970

you will be the laughing stock of betfair tomorrow morning when your mates read this thread.
a gambler that does not know the rules

The question is why did they void all bets matched during the enquiry?

i made my first million quid before i was 24 yoa

What did you spend it on?

im sure i surpassed that in other ways

could i start a list without incriminating myself

a result can not be offical until after the weigh in,so there was no weigh in, even though the judge announced the result,it was pending the weigh in,
and any jockey worth his salt is not going to weigh in if he lost some on the way round the tract,so i guess he pretended he forgot and hoped he could pick up a couple of lb lying about on the floor.

i lost my first million in about 6 months,trying to be the big fella,i thought i knew all about gambling

I was born a big fella.

ever kidnapped someone   this is like a reverse bucket list

i left school at 14 with a hole in the arse of my trousers.

handy for plying your future trade

think they got a name for it now,never heard of it till i read the tony 10 book

i was lucky,i got into the gambling game at the right time,and learned from my early mistakes and banked 10% of anything i earned each week.

tonykneefingerfoot.

in the isa's?

This Tony 10 is a book for loosers right?

on the rob from the bookies he worked for years....fair play

fairplay if he worked for baldcμnt

no my point was theres a phrasw in the book that covers a tonbridge type situation

basically

brassos waxed off

you are correct you rob from yourself.i palled about with a bunch of losers in my younger days,but it made me street wise,and when i arrived in England in 1968 all i had was £2 to my name. now i have houses,horses,cars,hotels,building companies ,but my time is nearly gone.

why would i rob from myself and as for the imminent death thing,yeah it hangs over all of us mr hotels

are you conrad hilton.say hello to paris

why should death worry anyone with a brain.

It's worth noting for some, that when you weight out, you weigh out without, hat, whip and number cloth. This is because the number cloths have recording stuff in them for timings and each one weights slightly different and therefore you don't weigh in with it either.

Now I once rode in a race where it was pouring with rain and I had light (7st 9lb). I didn't even have a weight cloth, just a chamois, a light foam pad, and my saddle. Now during this race my number cloth came off, basically because I was riding pretty much bare back (saddle weighed 110g) and luckily the foam pad was lodged in the girth. I finished 3rd and weighed in exactly the same as I weighed out. Now someone watching on tv, may have thought I lost part of my tack, but it's worth noting you don't weight in or out with your number cloth, so if you ever see a number cloth fly off don't presume a horse will weigh in light.

Given even an empty weight cloth would weigh 1-2lb if that comes off the horse is definitely getting disqualified.

brassneck    05 May 18 00:51 
there has to be an enquiry because the stewards have find out why a jockey fails to weigh in,are you alright Willie

a stewards was called straight away and market opened...the stewards should not have been called until the clerk of the scales discovered the weight indiscretion.

ok.ydc.

when a jockey falls off his horse after he crosses the winning line ,gets injured and goes to hospital and fails to weigh in for that reason,the stewards accept his reason for failing to weigh in and allow connections to keep the race.hope this helps.

that will be the next money making stroke,jockey dumps weight on way round the track,falls of horse and gets in ambulance,no weigh in but keeps the race.

correct procedure i think is that the clerk of the scales objects to jockey for not weighing in,informs the clerk of the course,who summons the stewards to enquire into the reason for the failure of the jockey to weigh in correctly.i am not saying this happened but that is what is suppose to happen,if someone rings the clerk of the course i am sure he will provide you with a statement

wtf has the clerk of the course to do with informing stewards of a weight indiscretion?

you were correct in your initial wording..

'think'.

anyhow,i am off to buy some brief cases and suit cases ,talk soon

you're already a head case.

ciao.

why was first past the post invented=food for thought

teaser for punters..