stewards exeter

might*

how long does it take to call that? jokers

horses are drunk, try driving in a straight line in that state

Ant tried that

Keeps that all day long.

1/20 winner

what was win dist?

cobden discussing tactics for the stewards

Second was picking up and much closer near the line and may have won, but with no interference result will stand

went across second but never cost it any ground. got to keep it

fitzgerald "flabbergasted" - shd fill his boots at 1/10

Flagship2    08 Apr 18 16:26 
Second was picking up and much closer near the line and may have won, but with no interference result will stand

pmsl

2nd never had to stop riding.

2nd looked like he was picking up because the other was going sideways, the 2nd wasn't coming with a run and just plodded on at the same pace.

the most important thing is did the 2nd lose more ground than it lost by

one of they ones that will probably stand but you wouldnt be lumping on at 1.14 and certainly wouldn't be
shocked if it got flung

did second lose any ground?

Jock on second had plenty of chance to get the horse up , tired jockey and tired horse , the result should stand !

Wesdag    08 Apr 18 16:30 
2nd never had to stop riding.

so full bank on 1.12?

how much ground do you lose by switching?

doubt they will take a race off jeremy scott - is he local? Somerset to Exeter? Not sure how close that is.

of course it will likely stand by imo it's not one to be "flabbergasted" by

winner went over it twice...beaten a rapidly diminishing hd..did it lose more than a hd?  yes imo..will it be disq? prob not.

would the second have won without the interference-it might of

Wouldn't be backing this at 1.1x, might get binned. Seems likely to keep it based on the money staying strong for it though!

Apr 8, 2018 -- 4:31PM, Willie Shafter. wrote:

Wesdag    08 Apr 18 16:30  2nd never had to stop riding.so full bank on 1.12?

Currently playing Carlisle ta.

Will re-visit.

result stands

it was 1.12 5 minutes before carlisle went off. youve no opinion to bet it then.

nk not hd

nk not hd

Watch out for the stewards report willie, 1.01 phrase "didn't stop riding" will feature.

was hd on my tele.

wes had a 1/8 there on a plate but choose not to bet it..

wonderful wes..another armchair expert.

Remember that sure thing at Newcastle last week?

If I'm gonna do my bollocks, at least I'll make sure it's my own doing rather being in the hands of some old dodderer who might have had too much sherry.

SO YOU DONT BET IN STEWARDS INQS..WELL THATS THAT CLARIFIED.

Not in every single 1 no - does anyone?

An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference on the run to the line when the winner, SHOOFLY MILLY (IRE), ridden by Matt Griffiths, drifted left-handed across BACT TO BLACK, placed second, ridden by Harry Cobden. The Stewards considered that the interference had not improved SHOOFLY MILLY (IRE)’s placing as the mare always appeared to be holding the second horse, and the distance at the line was a neck. The interference was found to be accidental as Griffiths took all reasonable steps to prevent the interference occurring.

no interference iyo you'd take any price surely?

sh hd wud of been very interesting there.

10-40

WD40

Been too many strange decisions recently.

Used to get involved in virtually every stewards back in the day - even Ireland

Only get involved in the more frivoulous ones these days.

used to like them back in the day.

there's been a wee handfull of questionable ones flung out over last 6 months or so that have certainly
knocked the confidence of firing in

yes i get the drift..but if you think no interefence then its max bet.

its not -


the stewards make it up

ok..max lay.

indeed, and there in lies the conundrum