There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Night get flung imo
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
|
By:
might*
|
|
By:
how long does it take to call that? jokers
|
|
By:
horses are drunk, try driving in a straight line in that state
|
|
By:
Ant tried that
|
|
By:
Keeps that all day long.
|
|
By:
1/20 winner
|
|
By:
what was win dist?
|
|
By:
Second was picking up and much closer near the line and may have won, but with no interference result will stand
|
|
By:
cobden discussing tactics for the stewards
|
|
By:
went across second but never cost it any ground. got to keep it
|
|
By:
fitzgerald "flabbergasted" - shd fill his boots at 1/10
|
|
By:
Flagship2 08 Apr 18 16:26
Second was picking up and much closer near the line and may have won, but with no interference result will stand pmsl |
|
By:
2nd never had to stop riding.
|
|
By:
2nd looked like he was picking up because the other was going sideways, the 2nd wasn't coming with a run and just plodded on at the same pace.
|
|
By:
the most important thing is did the 2nd lose more ground than it lost by
|
|
By:
one of they ones that will probably stand but you wouldnt be lumping on at 1.14 and certainly wouldn't be
shocked if it got flung |
|
By:
did second lose any ground?
|
|
By:
Jock on second had plenty of chance to get the horse up , tired jockey and tired horse , the result should stand !
|
|
By:
how much ground do you lose by switching?
doubt they will take a race off jeremy scott - is he local? Somerset to Exeter? Not sure how close that is. |
|
By:
Wesdag 08 Apr 18 16:30
2nd never had to stop riding. so full bank on 1.12? |
|
By:
of course it will likely stand by imo it's not one to be "flabbergasted" by
|
|
By:
winner went over it twice...beaten a rapidly diminishing hd..did it lose more than a hd? yes imo..will it be disq? prob not.
|
|
By:
would the second have won without the interference-it might of
|
|
By:
Wouldn't be backing this at 1.1x, might get binned. Seems likely to keep it based on the money staying strong for it though!
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
result stands
|
|
By:
it was 1.12 5 minutes before carlisle went off. youve no opinion to bet it then.
|
|
By:
nk not hd
|
|
By:
nk not hd
|
|
By:
Watch out for the stewards report willie, 1.01 phrase "didn't stop riding" will feature.
|
|
By:
was hd on my tele.
|
|
By:
wes had a 1/8 there on a plate but choose not to bet it..
wonderful wes..another armchair expert. |
|
By:
Remember that sure thing at Newcastle last week?
If I'm gonna do my bollocks, at least I'll make sure it's my own doing rather being in the hands of some old dodderer who might have had too much sherry. |
|
By:
SO YOU DONT BET IN STEWARDS INQS..WELL THATS THAT CLARIFIED.
|
|
By:
Not in every single 1 no - does anyone?
|
|
By:
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference on the run to the line when the winner, SHOOFLY MILLY (IRE), ridden by Matt Griffiths, drifted left-handed across BACT TO BLACK, placed second, ridden by Harry Cobden. The Stewards considered that the interference had not improved SHOOFLY MILLY (IRE)’s placing as the mare always appeared to be holding the second horse, and the distance at the line was a neck. The interference was found to be accidental as Griffiths took all reasonable steps to prevent the interference occurring.
|
|
By:
no interference iyo you'd take any price surely?
|
|
By:
sh hd wud of been very interesting there.
|
|
By:
10-40
|