Rozy Boys

stewards making out stalls did not open

I backed the 3rd and was thinking the same myself.

Didn't see start what happened?

I laid the thing on the spreads too

If it refused surely that's still a runner?

The stall clearly didn't open.

fair enough if that happened - void race though surely then?

if it didnt open thats okay hope atr show head on

I think there is previous for a horse been declared a non runner when the stall didn't open rather than voiding the entire race.

Being, not been.

THE mintbet.com THE HOME OF REFRESHING ODDS CLAIMING STAKES (CLASS 5)

Permission was given for PORT LAIRGE to go early to post.


An enquiry was held into the start and the possible withdrawal of ROZY BOYS, ridden by Jack Garritty. The rider and the Starter were interviewed and shown recordings of the start. It was found that ROZY BOYS was not deemed to have started because as the gelding became unruly in the stalls, Garritty had positioned his weight on the stalls framework and was not in the saddle as the start was effected. ROZY BOYS was withdrawn.

That's not feckin withdrawn it was under orders!

and the possible withdrawal

There's no such thing, either it was withdrawn or it counts as a runner

Starter in big trouble now - as if!?!

skinks

Isn't the rule that once under orders there's no non runners?

thats it

Can they restate that decision?

Otherwise how many installs non-runners could be possible!

Non runner at the 7furlong pole next then?

I've lost some poxy backs in the past on those that refused to start - then this one gets called a non-runner by erm...no-one, at the last second under orders?

No chance.

All that rubbish about the stall not opening.

there was a 5f race a few years ago , the horse bustout of the stalls a fraction of a second too early, led all the way and won , result stood
stewards never surprised me after that

Any one know reduction factor

My 1.59 ended up 1.31

Rozy Boys was retrospectively withdrawn from the claimer by the stewards after rocking back in the stalls and unseating Jack Garritty at the start. The 11-2 chance was deemed a non-runner and bets on winner Mujassam were levied a 15p in the pound deduction. This was probably the right decision although it may be a first.

just wait till the next one does it and is deemed a runner

Onthebit
Same as that
15p in £ SP
We are into 40%+ just can't see how
Explain someone please

So this was the right decision mrcombustible and all the other 99% were wrong?

Apr 1, 2018 -- 8:34PM, ONTHEBIT wrote:

My 1.59 ended up 1.31

Same as that
Sp 15P in £
We are on 40%+
Someone explain maths please

patsyone
long time since you have been on here
hope you are well
Ronnie.

down as withdrawn .... what an absolute disgrace, wtf is that withdrawn, stood still in the f00king gate refusing to race ....

No Sparrow I don't agree with decision.
Sorry that quote was from RP not me. I should have made that clear.

Fair enough mrcombustible.