Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 88 comments are related to the topic:
BENT SPS AGAIN FROM WOLVS

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 88
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 08 Jul 17 11:57
BHA / RING INSPECTING.     Whoops
By:
Happy Valley
When: 08 Jul 17 11:59
oh dear, yes i get your point, a rather unfortunate choice of words. nothing to do with my brighton roots i can assure you.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 08 Jul 17 12:10
only banter hv, i have spent many happy days at the greyhound track at hove, not so happy at the horse track. !
By:
Happy Valley
When: 08 Jul 17 13:07
GC yes i know, i thought it was very funny. we used to bunk into the dogs once or twice a week, now you'd be lucky if they let you out

had lot of luck up the hill, but have to think onlooker might be right about the fodder they serve up their now due to Northern Racing or whatever they are now called.
By:
Happy Valley
When: 08 Jul 17 13:11
trying to remember the name of the chief Ring Inspector whom i knew fairly well and who was nearly always on duty at Brighton. Could have been George something or other. Often wore a panama and always wore well-polished brown leather brogues
By:
Happy Valley
When: 08 Jul 17 13:12
he was as straight as a die and would never have tolerated the above kind of shenanigans. indeed the SP reporters were also of the utmost integrity, imo
By:
ronnie rails
When: 08 Jul 17 21:47
happy valley

do you remember wormwood scrubs sadly died way before his time
loved to read ringlets as the lady sang
those were the days my friend
regards
ronnie
By:
Happy Valley
When: 09 Jul 17 11:13
yes of course i remember him and his ringlets column, such a good bloke, had such a feel good factor about him, really brightened up the press room with his bonhomie and general kindness

he also knew his job inside out and upside down and i would never have doubted his integrity

and he also used to love to deal here and there in horse racing books, too, and other memorabelia
By:
factmachine
When: 10 Jul 17 21:20
EYES DOWN FOR TOMORROWS ACTION,1.55 START Plain
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:22
Last winner at Windsor was 7/2 and returned 6.76 on here. I posted this earlier as they were going in the stalls with plenty available at 6.6.
By:
factmachine
When: 10 Jul 17 21:24
BENT SPS AGAIN SPARROW!
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:26
Perhaps Barry Dennis was present there and can enlighten us on the goings on.
By:
factmachine
When: 10 Jul 17 21:29
IF THE HORSE IN QUESTION WAS 6.7 ON HERE,THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE RING WOULD BE AT LEAST 5/1,WITH PLENTY OF 11/2.
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:33
The point is that the majority of bookmaker backers would be on at 7/2 SP off course.
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:36
The joke is that I backed it at 5.6 and was annoyed Cry
Apologies for aftertiming but I did post the price discrepancy as they were going in the stalls.
By:
REDROB
When: 10 Jul 17 21:37
But Sparrow , what price was it in the place market on here, 11/8 ? I doubt it.
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:38
No idea, Redrob. But why should it matter about the place market?
By:
REDROB
When: 10 Jul 17 21:40
because I think that SP's are taken from boards going each way and not win only boards. If a bookie goes 11/2 cos bf is 6.6 and someone has 200 each way, he's snookered if the place is 4/5 on bf , and he's laid 11/8 a place.
By:
REDROB
When: 10 Jul 17 21:41
a lot of books price up so the place book is at least 100% , and of course this affects the win book.
By:
REDROB
When: 10 Jul 17 21:42
Win only books were probably bigger, but not used for purpose of SP.
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:43
Factmachine will answer for the bookmakers.

Harebell (IRE) 3, ch f 8-13 (Mr J H Richmond-Watson)
(Drawn 6) Rated 77
Halling (USA) - Prairie Flower (IRE)(Zieten (USA))
(Morning price: 13/2 6/1 13/2 6/1 13/2 6/1 5/1 9/2 7/2 100/30 7/2 4/1 9/2 4/1 100/30)
(Ring price: 4/1 7/2 10/3 3/1 7/2) SP 7/2
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Jul 17 21:48
The horse was 4th best so I very much doubt it was 4/5 a place on here. Prices were 9/4, 11/4, 11/4, 7/2, 10/1 with bookmakers.
By:
REDROB
When: 10 Jul 17 21:50
I was only asking. I have no idea what it was in the pl market.
By:
factmachine
When: 10 Jul 17 22:12
SPARROW,DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR ASKING,PLUS WHY ARE YOU QUOTING "MORNING PRICES"??? MORNING PRICES ON HERE YOU WILL BE LUCKY TO GET A FIVER ON,AND THE HIGH STREET BOOKMAKERS AND ONLINE NOT MUCH BETTER ????????????
By:
sparrow
When: 11 Jul 17 07:25
I just copied the text from the website to show the prices from the ring. The morning prices I agree are irrelevant.
All in all the off course industry have ripped off many thousands from their punters in this race and nothing will be done about it.
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Jul 17 19:30
7.25 Kempton Jane Rose 2/1 fav and 4.66 on here.
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Jul 17 19:35
At least RUK picked up on this latest stroke tonight.
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Jul 17 20:56
Hackney Road 8.55. 5/2 and 5.1 on here
By:
factmachine
When: 12 Jul 17 21:15
IT COULD WELL BE THE FUTURE SPARROW,IF THE LATEST ONCOURSE DEVELOPMENTS ARE TO BE BELIEVED!Sad
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Jul 17 21:19
What's that all about, factmachine?
By:
factmachine
When: 12 Jul 17 21:58
WILL KNOW MORE MONDAY.
By:
Big Boss
When: 13 Jul 17 02:37
it's all about the general price of the horse available to B.O.G. online BEFORE the drift on here.

then it's SP is cut to ribbons in the minute or two before the off, with no connection to the machine price, it's final price tallying up to what price it was generally available with the big 4.

so if Horse A is a general 2/1 poke and is backed all day with Lads, Billys and Joke Orals to B.O.G. prices and it drifts to say 5.8 on here, it would be 4/1 or 9/2 oncourse.

then the reps go to the SP sample as they are loading up and force its price back down to 2/1 ISP using a fraction of their liabilities to do so.

THIS NEEDS TO BE STAMPED OUT IMMEDIATELY, WHERE ARE THE HBF, STARTING PRICE REGULATORY PANEL AND GAMBLING COMMISSION WHEN YOU NEED THEM ? Angry
By:
McCoy Carp
When: 13 Jul 17 09:43
But why don't the on course bookies just keep taking their money and lay back on here for a no lose situation? Or is there collusion going on....................
By:
McCoy Carp
When: 13 Jul 17 09:44
Sorry, back on here, not lay.
By:
Big Boss
When: 13 Jul 17 10:59
the reps force the price down in increments pre-off and into a target price (the B.O.G. price that they have have laid throughout the day).

oncourse no doubt hedge it back on the exchange, a 500k BOG liability say is wiped out for a couple of grand via the reps on the track.

everyone is a winner, EXCEPT the punter who has a BOG price or the punters doing their conkers in the shops.
By:
Dav_vin03
When: 13 Jul 17 11:09
prepare to laugh

[/img]http://images.onesite.com/community.betfair.com/user/dav_vin03/thumb/fa97b9b574dbde25592b4db21bd9db03.jpg[/img]
By:
Dav_vin03
When: 13 Jul 17 11:10
By:
hulk23
When: 13 Jul 17 11:10
a window into the murky world of the big boys.

all parties clearly in it together, including those that should be policing it.

stinks.
By:
Dav_vin03
When: 13 Jul 17 11:11
By:
factmachine
When: 13 Jul 17 11:45
SPOT ON,HULK
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com