Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
factmachine
03 Jul 17 22:12
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Nov 05
| Topic/replies: 4,783 | Blogger: factmachine's blog
LAST FAV SP RETURN 9/4, PRICE OFFERED IN THE RING 4/1, PRICE ON HERE 5.2,HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT,STILL NOTHING BEING DONE!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 88
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Jul 17 05:43
The Betfair SP of the last fav. was 5.66 and it would be interesting to hear from any other Wolverhampton bookmaker as to what was actually going on there.
I assume you was there factmachine and laying 4/1 right up to the off.
By:
potty layer
When: 04 Jul 17 10:49
Shows from SIS; 11/4,3/1,7/2 and minutes after the result 9/4!hilarious
By:
factmachine
When: 04 Jul 17 11:10
ALAS SPARROW UNABLE TO ATTEND BUT I KNOW FOR A FACT IT WAS 4/1 AT THE OFF WITH AT LEAST ONE OF THE FIVE BOOKS IN ATTENDANCE,SEEMS TO BE A REGULAR OCCURRENCE AT WOLVS,BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS,DESPITE WARNINGS NOTHING IS EVER DONE!
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Jul 17 11:54
potty layer, last shows from the course before the race were 5/2 and 9/4 not 7/2.
factmachine, how many of those books were used for the SP return?
By:
factmachine
When: 04 Jul 17 11:58
THEY SEEM TO USE THE SAME ONES EVERY MEETING IRRESPECTIVE IF THEY STAND A BET OR NOT!
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Jul 17 12:13
This also happens at Kempton on a regular basis and often in the last race. But if an off course rep was prepared to back at below the odds shown and the on course man happy to lay then this will continue to happen.
By:
adge
When: 05 Jul 17 18:12
i'm informed that there were FIVE bookmakers. at the off four of them were offering 9/4 and the fifth was 4/1 but there were no punters in the ring then.
the sp returners use all bookmakers and dismiss the highest one and the lowest one , the sp being the average of the other three , hence 9/4 was correct.
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 05 Jul 17 18:16
adge , if there were no punters in the ring , how are the on-course bookmakers creating their odds
By:
sparrow
When: 05 Jul 17 18:20
Thank you, adge.
By:
factmachine
When: 05 Jul 17 23:32
ADGE,"SP RETURNERS USE ALL BOOKMAKERS" THAT IS PATENTLY NOT TRUE!
By:
sparrow
When: 06 Jul 17 05:59
the sp returners use all bookmakers and dismiss the highest one and the lowest one, the sp being the average of the other three ,






factmachine,  adge used the above wording which is quite different to "ALL Bookmakers"
By:
barry dennis
When: 06 Jul 17 07:24
Why are oncourse bookmakers so concerned about betting shop sp
By:
hulk23
When: 06 Jul 17 09:16
nobody's really backing at 5/2 when you can get 5.66 here, more a nod and a wink and the rep will see you in the car park in 15 minutes ... 9/4
By:
sparrow
When: 06 Jul 17 09:24
hulk23    Joined: 04 May 12
Replies: 4812 06 Jul 17 09:16 
nobody's really backing at 5/2 when you can get 5.66 here.






Nobody on here at the time would be backing, but what about all the bookmaker punters?
By:
REDROB
When: 06 Jul 17 10:12
Why would the public consider going to punt at a track that's trading at 5.2 on here, but in reality is 4/1 in the ring ?
On course punters don't care about the show, if 4/1 is available, that's why they go to a track surely. So no problem for oncourse punters, more fuel added to the "come racing" motto.
By:
factmachine
When: 06 Jul 17 10:18
READ THE POST AGAIN RED ??????????????????????????????
By:
factmachine
When: 06 Jul 17 10:20
ANYONE LOOKING FROM THE OUTSIDE WOULD THINK THE HORSE IN QUESTION COULD ONLY BE BACKED AT 9/4 WHEN IN REALITY ITS 4/1 ONCOURSE
By:
REDROB
When: 06 Jul 17 10:50
OK facts, teach the uninitiated. Hypothetically, if a bookie is attending a meeting where a few fancied horses have won, he gets to the last race, the bags took a bit of a hammering, on his own he is 4 the field, at what stage does he reduce the price, will it take 100, 200, 500, how much ? or does it not matter as long as the horse is 5.2 on here ? . Because by your reasoning he should not cut the price if it's 5.2 on here. Do bookies carry an endless supply of readies ? I am asking out of ignorance so ignore it if it sounds stupid.
By:
factmachine
When: 06 Jul 17 10:58
THE 5.2 ON HERE MIGHT BE TO £4, ITS UP TO THE BOOKMAKER WHAT PRICE HE DISPLAYS,A HORSE QUITE OFTEN WILL BE 2.96 ON HERE YET BE 2/1 FREELY OFFERED IN THE RING,THE POINT OF MY POST IS THE SP IS 100% BENT!
By:
sparrow
When: 06 Jul 17 11:49
Come on now the "5.2 on here might be up to £4" is absolute nonsense and well you know it. The fact is that 3 minutes before the off it was 5.5 with 4 figures available to back which is quite normal near to the off. It then returned 5.66. We know what happens with the bookmakers SP and this talk about £4 to back at 5.2 is just ridiculous.
By:
mmmalushka
When: 06 Jul 17 13:18
What actually happens at Wolverhampton when there are very few bookies and no punters is with a minute to offtime the off course firms
will approach the books that are offering 4/1 and ask for £500/£200 the aquieescent books then fire it straight onto the exchanges at 5.5 and upwards and then promptly cut the price to 9/4.So for the sake af a grand or so they can then return an SP of 9/4 thereby robbing 7000 shop punters and countless online customers of the proper market price.
It is Bribery,Collusion and a Cartel for price rigging which of course is illegal.
By:
Big Boss
When: 06 Jul 17 13:42
you forget the BOG savings as well, if a fav is 9/4 in the morning and is 5.5 on here a minute prior to the off, the books are going to back it in to 9/4 on the off using little money.

Calculate worldwide how many people will have taken a price online with them, you do the maths.
By:
Rigsby
When: 06 Jul 17 13:55
In a similar vein
Sometimes when I am bored I watch RPGTV and am amazed the 3 bookies and about 5 punters can create an SP that is used throughout the world. Don't know what over-rounds are, but surely it can't be right and fair. Maybe the punters taking these prices aren't bothered, but somebody or some organisation should be protecting them.
By:
casemoney
When: 06 Jul 17 13:56
If they were Not Chopping so much off you might think they were betting the Return FAV in the Shops Grin
By:
factmachine
When: 06 Jul 17 22:23
SPARROW,WHATS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE IS THAT YOU THINK YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO BACK A HORSE ON HERE AT 5.5 TO 4 FIGURES AT WOLVERHAMPTON AND YOU THINK THATS QUITE NORMAL,ALL I WILL SAY IS WATCH THE NEXT MEETING,I THINK YOU MIGHT BE SHOCKED!
By:
factmachine
When: 06 Jul 17 22:24
AS POSTED MANY TIMES BEFORE,I WOULD PROBABLY GET MORE ON IN MY LOCAL PUB Laugh
By:
sparrow
When: 06 Jul 17 23:15
I play every meeting at Wolverhampton and don't need you to tell me that 5 minutes before the off I can't get above £5 on. Neither do I believe your much repeated assertion that you beat all exchange prices. We can also check at the next Wolverhampton meeting as to whether we can get 4 figure bets on horses 5 minutes before the off.
By:
hulk23
When: 06 Jul 17 23:34
rep walks past bookie showing 4/1 to get on with someone else going 5/2, who then cuts to 9/4 and that's what the SP is derived from.

nothing suspicious there then ...
By:
factmachine
When: 07 Jul 17 11:06
HULK,REP ISNT SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHO IS IN THE SP SAMPLE,BUT THEY HAVE AN UNCANNY SKILL OF KNOWING WHO IS, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NUMBER OF BOOKS IN ATTENDANCE AT ANY MEET,THE SP IS 100% CROOKED! SPARROW OF COURSE YOU CAN GET MORE THAN A FIVER ON,BUT I DONT NEED YOU TO TELL ME THAT YOU CAN GET 4 FIGURES ON ALL HORSES AT WOLVERHAMPTON ON THIS SITE WHICH IS PATENTLY NONSENSE,THE ONLY WAY THAT WOULD HAPPEN IS IF YOU TOOK 9/2 FOR A 14/1 CHANCE,I ALSO DONT KNOW WERE YOU GOT THE "I BEAT ALL EXCHANGE PRICES" FROM EITHER,BUT I CONSTANTLY AM BIGGER THAN THE MACHINE EVERY FAVORITE WHICH IS A FACT,HENCE WHEN THE SP RETURN AT WOLVS IS 6/4 AND ME AND THE MAJORITY OF THE RING WERE 9/4 IT CAN BECOME RATHER IRRITATING!Love
By:
sparrow
When: 07 Jul 17 11:25
I will alert you 10 minutes to the off time at the next Wolverhampton meeting and we shall see if we can get a 4 figure bet on at the bookmakers price for the first 3 in the betting.
By:
factmachine
When: 07 Jul 17 14:36
WHY JUST THE FIRST 3 IN THE BETTING? I SHALL LOOK FORWARD TO IT.
By:
factmachine
When: 07 Jul 17 14:40
SORRY,"BOOKMAKERS PRICE"?????? NO I THOUGHT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WHATS AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE??? AS FOR THE RETURNED SPS FROM WOLS,THATS MY WHOLE POINT,THEY BARE NO RESEMBLANCE AT MOST MEETINGS TO REALITY!
By:
sparrow
When: 07 Jul 17 17:06
Ignore bookmakers price as I am just talking about horses at the top of the betting. We shall see how many we can get 4 figure bets on. All of which is a complete waste of time as everyone on here knows they can get these bets on.
By:
jamilla14
When: 07 Jul 17 21:40
The SP is the best available price available on one half of the boards in the sample.
If at Wolverhampton there were five bookmakers, the SP in this case would be the best price available on three boards.
It seems that 9/4 is the correct return.
By:
hulk23
When: 07 Jul 17 22:02
think we've established that jamilla.  what we're curious about is who was happy to back the fav at 5/2 (with enough to knock it into 9/4) when the bookie next door was going 4/1. 

why would you do that ... maybe just didn't want to win too much ?
By:
mmmalushka
When: 08 Jul 17 00:14
Hulk,all the non off course books. at the time would be laying at 4/1,the off course firms approach them with an offer of (bribe)500 to 200 (not 4/1) to tip the wink which they are only too happy to accomodate
As I said before  it is BRIBERY, COLLUSION and PRICE RIGGING.
By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 08 Jul 17 07:28
Shouldn't our trade paper be focussing on integrity rather than stiring up whip issues again? Just doesn't make any sense.
By:
Big Boss
When: 08 Jul 17 11:34
so u have Laddies, Hills, Corals, et al price rigging on course a 4/1 shot to return 9/4.

Yet boot on the other foot, if you have the temerity to even back one slightly better than the exchange or a shortener with these firms they cut you to peanuts in an instant.

Seems to me they want it all ways up
By:
Happy Valley
When: 08 Jul 17 11:51
don't the BHA still have ring inspectors to ensure this kind of thing doesn't happen

they used to be ex CID and men of integrity, back in the day!
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com