Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Racingqueen
29 Mar 17 20:14
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Jul 11
| Topic/replies: 9,364 | Blogger: Racingqueen's blog
Weeee'vvveee Raaaaatttted Im on izzzzz Bodddy of wuuuuurrrrk

Using this logic, if some nag beats up a load of muck multiple times, he'll get rated higher

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 66
By:
Racingqueen
When: 29 Mar 17 20:20
Jaysus, shes having a go at Frankel now ffs Laugh
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 20:22
And she makes some relevant points.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 20:24
I find the suggestion that Arrogate would beat Frankel on turf ludicrous tbh.
By:
gentlemanjohn
When: 29 Mar 17 20:24
Rachel won that on points i reckon
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 20:29
The 2 horses Timeform rated below Frankel Sea Bird and Brigadier Gerard achieved far more. And I saw all three of them.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 20:37
I didn't see them. Frankel the best by miles in my living memory. But I think it is hard to make direct comparisons over very different eras. Frankel with the exception of one race where I feel the rider completely misjudged the race (and he still won) looked unbeatable. He destroyed numerous Group One winners. I find it hard to believe the other two horses were far better, though I guess it depends on your criteria.

Desert Orchid achieved more than Sprinter Sacre as an example. I would still say the latter was the more outstanding horse.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 20:45
Frankel may well have achieved more if connections had allowed him to run in more competitive races. He never ventured further than York and almost always with a pacemaker. Brigadier Gerard and Sea Bird ran in all the top races whereas Frankel ran in just one classic.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:05
good evening sparrow

both the brig and sea bird only ran in one classic also,regarding big races the dewhurst,the st ja
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:08
st james palace,qe2,lockinge,queen anne,benson and hedges {brig beaten in}and the champion stakes are pretty big races throw in a couple of sussex stakes he had a fair record.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:18
Evening foxy, I was wrong about the classics but you and I both know that Frankel was not campaigned competitively. You can't compare his racing record with the other 2 in terms of the opposition he faced.  That 2000 guineas field Frankel beat was one of the weakest in many years.
We shall never know how good Frankel was due to the races he should but never ran in.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 21:29
How was he not campaigned competitively? 10 Group One wins? Ok, he didn't run in the Derby and for my money the horse may not have been as effective at 12f. I don't believe it detracts from his greatness.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:31
i totally agree about his 2,000 guineas and would even admit that the opposition that day were ridden to finish 2nd at best,however his performances as a 4 year old at royal ascot and york were outstanding his queen anne performance the best i have ever seen his juddmonte win only bettered by troy in the 79 derby and the 86 arc he was around for 3 seasons and was champion 2 year old something neither the brig or sea bird were,sea bird finished 7 from 8 the brigadier of course had a fine record beaten only by a derby winner at york ,i never saw either brigadier gerard or sea bird but dont for one minute think they were anything but top class but frankels run of wins in the style he did it was something i wont see again.
By:
crepello
When: 29 Mar 17 21:32
Where is brigust1?
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:38
The Brigadier was not as effective at 12f but it never stopped him running and winning the King George. He ran over trips from 5 to 12f. Frankel was running over a mile as a 2 year old and was bred to get 12f. Had he run in either the Arc, King George or Breeders Cup then we would have known just how good he was.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:39
I was thinking the same crepello. He would put the case far better than me for the Brigadier.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:40
indeed crepello i keep promising myself not to get involved in frankel debates anymore but cant help myself sometimes.

almost 5 years since we last saw him i would have thought by now everybody would have accepted he was the best racehorse ever to raceWink
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 21:40
Sparrow, I am very confident of how good he was at 8f and 10f. Monstrously so. Would wining a top 12f race automatically make him a better horse?
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:47
brigadier was less impressive than frankel in the st james palace a 4 runner race one had won the thirsk classic trial and the diomed stakes one was last in the 2,000 guineas the other had won a maiden,the brigadier got up in the last few strides.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:48
I wanted to see him out of his comfort zone, barton. I just don't think he met the quality of opposition that the other 2 horses came up against. Horses such as Mill Reef and My Swallow were different class to what Frankel came up against. Sea Bird slaughtered some great horses in his time. Here is a quote.......          In their book A Century of Champions, John Randall and Tony Morris rated Sea-Bird the greatest racehorse of the 20th century, one pound ahead of Secretariat and two pounds ahead of Ribot and Brigadier Gerard.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:51
7 seconds slower than frankel as well in that race.mind you kingman was more impressive than the pair of them in that particular race.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:53
You have picked probably his worst ever performance there foxy. Look at what the Brigadier beat in his other races.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:55
Where the hell is brigust. He has forgotten more than I know about Brigadier Gerard. Grin
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 21:55
Fair enough sparrow. They are better qualified to rate horses from those eras than I am. Would argue that being the best horse of the 20th Century (rightly or wrongly judged) does not necessarily make him better than the best horse of the 21st Century though.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 21:57
cirrus,nathanial,farhh,st nicholas abbey,twice over,excellabration,strong suit,dick turpin,canford cliffs,dream ahead,and treasure beach maybe not mill reefs but not a bad bunch who won plenty of top races.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 21:59
That might be Arrogate yet, barton. But we will never know and in years to come people will have other things to say. At least I can say that I saw Arkle who hardly anyone would doubt.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:00
i know i did sparrow Devilcould not resist it,it would be nice if we could see something 1/2 as good as these three over the coming flat season.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 22:00
Canford Cliffs was the second coming according to some until Frankel put him firmly in his place.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 22:00
See him live, Sparrow?
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:01
regarding arrogate some right rubbish has won that dubai world cup and as for american racing well i am afraid that doesnt count.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 22:02
Well we can but hope, foxy.
By:
Barton Bank
When: 29 Mar 17 22:04
Don't think anyone would claim that Arkle isn't the best NH horse of all time. I slightly raise my eyebrows about the top horses from that generation being rated quite so far ahead of the likes of Kauto Star and Denman but his record speaks for himself.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 22:05
Not live I'm afraid barton. My father saw Golden Miller who won 5 gold cups and he said Arkle was in a different league.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:06
sparrow

it would have been interesting to see arkle v kauto at kempton.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 22:11
Arkle would have sorely tested Kauto's jumping foxy. I think he would have broke his heart as he did with Mill House in the end. He was relentless.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:13
kauto was at the top an awful long time sparrow and on the whole he was a good jumper.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 29 Mar 17 22:15
Trying 12f might not have made Frankel a better horse, but it would have given him the opportunity to become a great one. The greatest thoroughbreds for me are the ones who are asked to do the business in adverse conditions, and still find a way to win, even if the ratings they produce are a stone below the ones they've achieved in perfect conditions.

Nijinsky's Leger, Desert Orchid's Gold Cup, the Brigadier's King George ... they were races where horses of the highest class in terms of ratings were all out to get home from second-raters, yet those were also the races which sealed those horses' greatness. The Triple Crown and that endless Doncaster straight, the Gold Cup, left-handed in the mud, and taking up the challenge of the mile and a half trip which has made the breed what it is.

I can understand all sorts of reasons why a great horse might not necessarily make it to post on Derby day itself. But to duck the 12f challenge at every stage, even without the added difficulties of the track, date and atmosphere offered by Derby day itself to contend with, that's just a waste of a good horse.
By:
sparrow
When: 29 Mar 17 22:17
Yes he was foxy but he wasn't giving 2 and 2 and a half stone to horses like Stalbridge Colonist who himself was placed in 2 gold cup's.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:20
excellent example with nijinsky screaming,a horse often forgotten when people talk about the greats ,nice of ballydoyle to have a crack with camelot hopefully i will see a triple crown before i pop it,saw oh so sharp but that was not quite the same.
By:
foxy
When: 29 Mar 17 22:21
sparrow i am fighting a losing battle regarding arkle Mischief
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com