|
By:
Assume they don't even look on here to see what there customers want think they know what is best for us
|
|
By:
"Racing Post close up"..Rubbish.....Led early, went clear, made all, heavily eased,,the other runner Editors Whim could not overcome all the overweight the arrogant/ignorant jockey put up...!!
|
|
By:
Rubbish and ran by someone who is in the books pockets, paper worse than ever as well.
|
|
By:
I buy the sunday times and the racing post on a sunday. Both used to be £2.50. Post now £2.70 (2 price rises) and the Times still £2.50. Times is infinitely better value.
|
|
By:
I trust the new site is a big improvement for tablet and phone users as it's been ruined for laptop and desktop users.
|
|
By:
I complained as loudly as anyone when they changed the site years ago,but this time I have had only minor adjustment problems. The site seems a bit less sticky than it did,perhaps because fewer people are using it. I suspect it depends which features you relied on in the first place as to how it affects you.
|
|
By:
It is taking time to get used to the new site and I still prefer the old one but the real issue for me is the functionality of both sites. Frozen screens, constant messages telling me the site is not responding etc. etc. If I had the same issues from other sites I would blame my internet connection but I don't. I pay for the RP site as I like to look at pedigrees, statistics, bloodstock pages and use my own ratings but my patience is running out.
|
|
By:
Rubbish.
|
|
By:
They said that it was changed (in part at least) to make it easier for mobile and tablet users. I used it for the first time on my phone the other day (to check results/compare form of winners through the day etc while at Newbury races) and it was impossible and i had to go to sportinglife. It works ok on the tablet but opens everything on one page so i can't have multiple pages to look at to compare trainers jocks etc. It works fine on my main comp but now they have put virtually all the reports behind the paywall and in it's current state there isn't a hope in Hades of me paying for it. I suspect there will be lots of copy that is barely read by more than the proofreaders - if they still employ any!
If the improvements don't improve anything (and in some cases makes things a whole lot worse) then it is a worthless 'upgrade'. |