Mar 27, 2017 -- 7:29PM, Whippin Piccadilly wrote:
After 20 minutes I decide I've probably completed the analysis I wanted (which used to take 5 minutes on the old site), but I have this nagging feeling that I haven't done it thoroughly or accurately. There were just too many diversions which left me unsure whether I'd actually investigated all I intended to.I understand exactly where you're coming from, Screaming. I feel like I can't get a handle on the races I'm looking at and it feels like I've not made all the correct assessments even if I'm trebling the time to study each race than I did before. This is no exaggeration when I say that I'm going to have to retire from betting on horse racing after 20+ years of punting.The Racing Post newspaper is OK but it doesn't have all that I need for the way I conduct my form study. The RP website in its previous format was vital for me in how I study a race. I can't relearn the way I study and its completely unfair that I should have to either with myself being a loyal buyer of the newspaper and website memberships over so many years. This is truly end of an era for me.
I've been making my own form pages in Excel for quite some time now, using the profile page from the Post as a base so I feel your pain slightly. I'll have to find a way around it and use another 'base' (the new RP profile page just doesn't work), but I'm not yet sure how I'll go about updating my existing form pages (based on the old RP base) with data from a new source. It's a pain but I'll manage. As should you. It's dangerous to be over-reliant on any one source.

