Iv'e Always been good at picking winners, after reading books from Alan Potts, Nick Mordin etc...
Im on the verge of taking the dive and going full time but read an article where one of the pros bets but also trades.
The Question is when is a good time to trade or just let it ride? I don't know where to begin.
My longest loosing run is 30 but recently had 8 winners on the bounce. I had Rule the World for example in the national and i'm trying to work out if I had traded out then I would have lost lots of profit, so where do you find the balance between trading and Just straight out betting?
Has anyone experienced this before, Would trading actually lose you money in the long run? How would you work it out?
14/04/2016 Luke Donald (EW) 16/1 B Grace 500.00 15/04/2016 Demora 10/1 Demora 10,000.00
16/04/2016 Alvardo (EW) 32/1 Vicente 9,000.00 Cause of Causes 18/1 -800.00
18/04/2016 Tott, Man C 20/1 3-0 Tottenham -1,000.00
19/04/2016 - - - -1,000.00
21/04/2016 C Hoffman 30/1 C Hoffman (-12) 27,000.00 C Hoffman 30/1 B Steele -900.00 B Steele 46/1 B Steele 41,400.00 C Hoffman, Kuchar, Walker 10/1 - -500.00
21/04/2016 L Ko, S Feng, C Hoffman 10/1 - -500.00 L Ko, S Feng, C Hoffman 10/1 - 1,500.00
23/04/15 C Tringale 50/1 Brian Stuard(-16) -1,000.00 C Tringale, B Weekly 50/1, 90/1 Brian Stuard -2,000.00 C Tringale - -1,000.00 B Weekly - -1,000.00 S Lewis 11/1 J shin (-14) -1,000.00
05/05/2015 P Mickleson E/W 35/1 B Stuard (-15) 7,800.00 P Mickleson E/W 35/1 -1,600.00
12/05/2016 Luke donald E/W 110/1 J Day (-15) -1,500.00 Luke Donald E/W 110/1 -1,500.00
Dustin Johnson 10/1 -1,600.00 Dustin Johnson 15/1 -800.00 C Hoffman 30/1 -800.00 D John, C Hoff, J Day -1,000.00 D John, C Hoff, J Day -1,000.00
ITS A BIT OF A MESS HAD TO COPY PASTE OFF WORD SHEET , SOME GOLF BETS ARE FIRST DAY LEADERS AND 3 BALLS.
NAME CHOSEN IS FOLLOWED BY WINNER AND ODDS. SO YOU MAY SEE SAME NAME TWICE ON SAME LINE.
2016 Dates Selections Odds Winner Profit 02/01/2016 Relax 10/1 Soll -200.00 09/01/2016 Emperors Choice 50/1 Mountainous -400.00 -50.0014/01/2016 Tim Clark 440/1 F Gomez (-20)
freddiewilliams 15 Jul 16 20:01 if u can back 30 losers in row.....and not lose ure head......there is hope....but pros dont back in grand naional
Pros might not bet in the National now but Alex Bird had plenty of success in the race.
freddiewilliams 15 Jul 16 20:01 if u can back 30 losers in row.....and not lose ure head......there is hope....but pros dont back in grand naionalPros might not bet in the National now but Alex Bird had plenty of success in the race.
The golf bets trouble me most. With picking max 2 golfers in a tournament to be 1st round leaders and 72 hole leaders thats 4 bets and the 1st, 2nd day 3 balls thats 6 bets total.
with say 50 pga tournaments a year thats max 300 golf bets and although i had a B steele at 46/1 1st round leader winner and then C Hoffman overall winner at 30/1 in same tournament, I'm not confident at getting 300/1 over the year.
Im easily up on Horse racing.
Football bets are usually 1 weekly, 1 sat & 1 sunday, btts/win doubles and win 4 folds. Thats 6 footy bets a week, but not got enough data yet to see if i'd be up in the long run.
So when I write out my betting plan it would suggest now to Trade the Golf, Let the Racing bets ride and perhaps look into trading football correct scores.
Im just scheming at the moment.
How many bets do pros have?
I suppose then a good time to trade is when you watching the Event Live and you can foresee trouble ahead for your selection ?
I agree rmccarthy.The golf bets trouble me most. With picking max 2 golfers in a tournament to be 1st round leaders and 72 hole leaders thats 4 bets and the 1st, 2nd day 3 balls thats 6 bets total.with say 50 pga tournaments a year thats max 300 golf
Good Shout Freddie, I've always had a full time job and no discipline. Never had any real structure to my betting but i'm now on the verge of a breakthrough, that moment you get when you know its possible to make a living from betting if you can get your sht togeather.
It took me a week to analyse the grand national winner and not always got the time to analyse but my main question i suppose was to a MATH Guy, What is the math concerning whether its better to trade or just straight out bet?
I've never thought about it before and wondered if anyone had already thought about it.
Good Shout Freddie, I've always had a full time job and no discipline. Never had any real structure to my betting but i'm now on the verge of a breakthrough, that moment you get when you know its possible to make a living from betting if you can get
I really wanted the number 41 horse that didn't qualify, forgot its name, but after the ground report on saturday it basically threw alot of my short list away. Gooney Ella and Many clouds was my others but ground was bad for many clouds. many clouds straight win and gooneyella, rule the world each way.
Grand national is easy analyse race becuase there is just so much data.
I really wanted the number 41 horse that didn't qualify, forgot its name, but after the ground report on saturday it basically threw alot of my short list away. Gooney Ella and Many clouds was my others but ground was bad for many clouds. many cloud
If I use a £20'000 bankroll and only bet 2% then even with my 30 race loosing streak then i still have half my bankroll left.
and betting on Lupton Lad 3.35 Newbury for 8/1 with 2% of bankroll is £400 increasing bank by 16% if it wins. So Racing angle is solid. with no need to trade out.
but golf and football i will need to scheme about and get a staking plan and/or Trading plan. So the question was about bet or Trade on certain events?
If I use a £20'000 bankroll and only bet 2% then even with my 30 race loosing streak then i still have half my bankroll left.and betting on Lupton Lad 3.35 Newbury for 8/1 with 2% of bankroll is £400 increasing bank by 16% if it wins. So Racing ang
The only time to trade out is at a loss to try and reduce exposure when a given bet is fooked up. Never trade out because a price has shortened that's just silly.
The only time to trade out is at a loss to try and reduce exposure when a given bet is fooked up. Never trade out because a price has shortened that's just silly.
Joe: how many of the 30 losing run would you have been able to trade out at a profit in-running? I always prefer to protect my stake at first available meaningful profit stage. Even with a savage losing run of 30, by protecting your stake your bank would still remain fairly healthy.
Joe: how many of the 30 losing run would you have been able to trade out at a profit in-running? I always prefer to protect my stake at first available meaningful profit stage. Even with a savage losing run of 30, by protecting your stake your bank
So looking at it. if I choose a horse thats 11.0 for £10 thats £100 profit.
If in play the Odds shorten to half of that :
Half : 5.5 then for trading at £20 lay you get back 10% of what you would have got if it won. Quarter : 2.74 then trading out £40 lay you get back 30% Eighth : 1.38 then trading £80 lay you get 60%
I don't know enough about trading but Im thinking maybe looking at longer odds can more easily come into half and a quarter like 100.0 to 50.0 then 25.0 etc so trading out of these bigger prices would possibly be more profitable in the long run.
Im thinking maybe there is a curve that gives the optimal trade amount for each Price I can get but Im thinking now it will boil down to knowing my strike rate for the different odds i can get.
So looking at it. if I choose a horse thats 11.0 for £10 thats £100 profit. If in play the Odds shorten to half of that : Half : 5.5 then for trading at £20 lay you get back 10% of what
The Answer was to Treat Traditional betting and Trading as two complete seperate entities.
If you are good at picking winners then there is no need to trade but always keep records to look for an angle.
Thanks anyway
I asked a Proffessional in the end.The Answer was to Treat Traditional betting and Trading as two complete seperate entities.If you are good at picking winners then there is no need to trade but always keep records to look for an angle.Thanks anyway