Stewards Goodwood

load up james..

I sayed that 2 minutes ago

1.08 are you filling your boots

wreckless riding ?

all in

Some think the 3rd might get it.

they did yesterday

par 20 May 16 16:40 
wreckless riding ?


if you think that you need sectioned.

really,

you could have dragged someone out the stands to ride more responsibly,

he has near bowled three horses over with no effort to straighten the horse, wreckless in my opinion

justice

maybe not me needing sectioned

Stewards no longer read the rules, just make em up as they go along

Absolutely the right decision. You can only go so far with so called rules of racing before sheer common sense kicks in. Well done stewards!!!

central stewarding now please!!!!!!!!!

most ridiculous decision in a long timr

that's why i would never bet in an enquiry

baffling

EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:02 
Absolutely the right decision

jeff..that same scenario has happened dozens and dozens of times and without a jockey being guilty of reckless riding they are never ever demoted.

evilroy we all know its the right decision but in the rules as they stand there's NO WAY they could call that

"free muneeee", ha? :)

did they take into consideration the start though

EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:02
Absolutely the right decision

how much did u have on at 20/1?

OP, no idea!

Layed Seeking Magic. Correct result irrespective of any bets!

It was clearly an appalling decision as the rules stand> totally unjustifiable. And to make it worse they placed it in front of Clear Spring. Apparently they can tell exactly how much Huntsman's and Clear Spring lost to place it behind one and ahead of the other.

I agree with all that has been said regarding the rules as they stand. Did they take into account the manoeuvre from the stalls by any chance.That  may also have been a factor.

EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:07 
Layed Seeking Magic. Correct result irrespective of any bets!


post ya bet

He hit the horse on its right flank to straighten its run but the horse carried on veering so Jockey couldn't have
been at fault so decision was wrong

layed Seeking Magic i/r shocked its got chucked.
How they can define it impeded Huntsamns sufficient to demote it yet not have a knock on to Clear Spring beggars as much belief as does the change of the result.
If your placing it behind Huntsmans then shouldnt be in 1st 3.

roida why don't you post your free muneee bet

that one prob hurt a lot of people because many would have gone in with that drift and loaded up thinking the 2nd wasn't impeded and distance was too big to 3rd, painful

I still feel very sorry for anyone who has done their cash on a race where "rules" of racing as they stand leave us all even more confused.

2016-05-20
17:02    68725954981    2016-05-20
16:31    GB Good 20th May / 16:35 6f Hcap Stks / Seeking Magic
Lay         4.00    18.50    Won         18.50



  As you can see Roi, didn't stand to lose the earth, but prefer to get back what I consider mine by right!

Has roida posted his bet yet

seems the stewards do what they want these days.

so you have no bet in the stewards after all that roy.

" so dramatic " he says. That's nowt to do with it.

A very surprising reverse.

999 times out of a 1000 that stands.

start fine , so again shocking

posh nobbing with Charlton


''in our mind easier to change it'' clueless this guy

"999 times out of a 1000 that stands. "

It was an amazing value bet then. Which didn't win this time.

The stewards just thought it looked bad and their heads forgot the rules

Why should he just because someone thinks the decision is morally correct does not mean the stewards will do the right thing.

This steward making it up as he goes along. Sounds like he ain't got a fking clue

steward is struggling here

wd stewards....burn the money buyers

it does seem a bit woolly here

this guy aint got a clue roflchops

what a load of ifs buts and maybes...stuttering stumbling mess

Steward can barely talk.....sounds half drunk.

I didn't say I had Roi. I layed the "winner" pre race. As you said, and as I thought, it seemed highly unlikely it would be chucked, even impossible. That doesn't mean it wasn't the correct decision. The rules WOULD encourage the big hitters like yourself to dive in and hoover up the cash. The result has surprised me greatly, but nonetheless I think it justified.

This guy is a total embarrassment. What the hell is he doing deciding the results of stewards enquiries.

Be fair...it's hard to justify a totally wrong decision

mellish just sticking the knife in

He's laughing about it now, fking chancer

"We didn't notice he crossed over before the orange marker Steve......

Never seen anyone try to justify a position with such utter non belief

well that's cleared that up then

i thought steve was excellent there, well done that man lol