Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
roida
20 May 16 16:38
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Feb 11
| Topic/replies: 18,356 | Blogger: roida's blog
free muneeee

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 56
By:
jamesdean
When: 20 May 16 16:39
Cool
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 16:39
load up james..
By:
Deltâ
When: 20 May 16 16:39
I sayed that 2 minutes ago
By:
Gerbs
When: 20 May 16 16:40
1.08 are you filling your boots
By:
par
When: 20 May 16 16:40
wreckless riding ?
By:
tomhunt
When: 20 May 16 16:41
all in
By:
Wesdag
When: 20 May 16 16:41
Some think the 3rd might get it.

LaughCrazy
By:
tomhunt
When: 20 May 16 16:42
they did yesterday Laugh
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 16:42
par 20 May 16 16:40 
wreckless riding ?


if you think that you need sectioned. Blush
By:
par
When: 20 May 16 16:48
really,

you could have dragged someone out the stands to ride more responsibly,

he has near bowled three horses over with no effort to straighten the horse, wreckless in my opinion
By:
mini me
When: 20 May 16 16:59
justice
By:
par
When: 20 May 16 17:00
maybe not me needing sectioned
By:
IDKW
When: 20 May 16 17:01
Stewards no longer read the rules, just make em up as they go alongLaughLaugh
By:
EVILROYSLADE
When: 20 May 16 17:02
Absolutely the right decision. You can only go so far with so called rules of racing before sheer common sense kicks in. Well done stewards!!!
By:
Hushwing.
When: 20 May 16 17:02
Crycentral stewarding now please!!!!!!!!!Crazy

most ridiculous decision in a long timrCrazy
By:
par
When: 20 May 16 17:03
that's why i would never bet in an enquiry

baffling
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 17:03
EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:02 
Absolutely the right decision

jeff..that same scenario has happened dozens and dozens of times and without a jockey being guilty of reckless riding they are never ever demoted.
By:
Hushwing.
When: 20 May 16 17:04
evilroy we all know its the right decision but in the rules as they stand there's NO WAY they could call thatAngryCrazy
By:
lynxx
When: 20 May 16 17:04
"free muneeee", ha? :)
By:
tomhunt
When: 20 May 16 17:04
did they take into consideration the start though
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 17:05
EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:02
Absolutely the right decision

how much did u have on at 20/1?
By:
Deltâ
When: 20 May 16 17:07
OP, no idea!
By:
EVILROYSLADE
When: 20 May 16 17:07
Layed Seeking Magic. Correct result irrespective of any bets!
By:
asparagus
When: 20 May 16 17:08
It was clearly an appalling decision as the rules stand> totally unjustifiable. And to make it worse they placed it in front of Clear Spring. Apparently they can tell exactly how much Huntsman's and Clear Spring lost to place it behind one and ahead of the other.
By:
EVILROYSLADE
When: 20 May 16 17:10
I agree with all that has been said regarding the rules as they stand. Did they take into account the manoeuvre from the stalls by any chance.That  may also have been a factor.
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 17:11
EVILROYSLADE 20 May 16 17:07 
Layed Seeking Magic. Correct result irrespective of any bets!


post ya bet
By:
Breedingmad
When: 20 May 16 17:12
He hit the horse on its right flank to straighten its run but the horse carried on veering so Jockey couldn't have
been at fault so decision was wrong
By:
geoff m
When: 20 May 16 17:12
layed Seeking Magic i/r shocked its got chucked.
How they can define it impeded Huntsamns sufficient to demote it yet not have a knock on to Clear Spring beggars as much belief as does the change of the result.
If your placing it behind Huntsmans then shouldnt be in 1st 3.
By:
fife
When: 20 May 16 17:12
roida why don't you post your free muneee betMischief
By:
elise
When: 20 May 16 17:12
that one prob hurt a lot of people because many would have gone in with that drift and loaded up thinking the 2nd wasn't impeded and distance was too big to 3rd, painful
By:
EVILROYSLADE
When: 20 May 16 17:13
I still feel very sorry for anyone who has done their cash on a race where "rules" of racing as they stand leave us all even more confused.
By:
EVILROYSLADE
When: 20 May 16 17:19
2016-05-20
17:02    68725954981    2016-05-20
16:31    GB Good 20th May / 16:35 6f Hcap Stks / Seeking Magic
Lay         4.00    18.50    Won         18.50



  As you can see Roi, didn't stand to lose the earth, but prefer to get back what I consider mine by right!DevilWink
By:
fife
When: 20 May 16 17:20
Has roida posted his bet yetPlain
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 17:21
seems the stewards do what they want these days.
By:
roida
When: 20 May 16 17:23
so you have no bet in the stewards after all that roy.
By:
howard
When: 20 May 16 17:24
" so dramatic " he says. That's nowt to do with it.
By:
Wesdag
When: 20 May 16 17:24
A very surprising reverse.

999 times out of a 1000 that stands.
By:
Hushwing.
When: 20 May 16 17:25
start fine , so again shockingCryCrazy

posh nobbing with Charlton


''in our mind easier to change it''Laugh clueless this guy
By:
lynxx
When: 20 May 16 17:25
"999 times out of a 1000 that stands. "

It was an amazing value bet then. Which didn't win this time.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com