Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 94 comments are related to the topic:
Stewards at fos las free money

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 94
By:
Insanity Later
When: 14 Dec 15 16:13
Gone
By:
Jack Bauer '24'
When: 14 Dec 15 16:13
Reversed
By:
hellohello
When: 14 Dec 15 16:13
This "sport" stinks
By:
Breedingmad
When: 14 Dec 15 16:13
2nd won it..
By:
onlooker
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
Car Crash for jamesdean
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
Chucked.....................Like I said whether it would have gone past means nothing
By:
duncan idaho
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
the free money just got pretty expensive
By:
Greg_Gory
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
stewards cleaned up just before the decision
By:
Wesdag
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
Not your proudest moment jamesdean.

Let's hope no impressible types didn't wade in.
By:
elise
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
think i can count on one hand the number of times i've backed a reversal and got it in the stewards
By:
Rider
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
only surprise is why gayebury was so short in the betting
By:
par
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
always have another wee look before declaring an opinion young man, come on now.
By:
Brian
When: 14 Dec 15 16:14
All this easy moneyGrin
By:
robbie fowler is god
When: 14 Dec 15 16:15
shocking decision ,well it nrmally does if the hose had chance to go past and dosnt he never gets it .swap trainers and the result would of stood
By:
Wesdag
When: 14 Dec 15 16:15
*impressionable
By:
Gerald the Show Pony
When: 14 Dec 15 16:15
home ref methinks
By:
robbie fowler is god
When: 14 Dec 15 16:16
1st time out horses on heavy ground dont go for minor interference
By:
Daz7
When: 14 Dec 15 16:17
they'll get that back on appeal - the interference clearly did not affect the placings - runner up was always being held and was making no impression at the line
By:
robbie fowler is god
When: 14 Dec 15 16:17
yep
By:
the dealer
When: 14 Dec 15 16:17
no chance of that happening imo
By:
ladycarla
When: 14 Dec 15 16:17
Jockey forgot his mum owned the runner up, stewards to the rescue Laugh
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 14 Dec 15 16:17
Well done Dan, a shrewd observation!
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 14 Dec 15 16:18
Of course it wasn't a shocking decision. Could easily see it had every chance of going
By:
Jack Bauer '24'
When: 14 Dec 15 16:18
Would have won if allowed to run in a straight line. In my view the interference clearly affected the result.
By:
hellohello
When: 14 Dec 15 16:18
Corrupt sport through and through
By:
redmal
When: 14 Dec 15 16:19
Right result for once.
By:
robbie fowler is god
When: 14 Dec 15 16:19
normally u can cut a horse up make it stop to a standstill and still keep the race ,the 2nd never stopped riding
By:
hellohello
When: 14 Dec 15 16:20
Stewards going home in a big limo
By:
duncan idaho
When: 14 Dec 15 16:20
not so easy to go past when you are persistently being pushed sideways, so i dont agree with the 'wouldnt go past' argument...was a toss-up for me
By:
onlooker
When: 14 Dec 15 16:21
Give it up - hellohello - That is three, insubstantiated, nonsense posts you have made.
By:
hellohello
When: 14 Dec 15 16:23
The name Williams is a big clue...there, that's 4
By:
elise
When: 14 Dec 15 16:23
i felt that was the right call myself
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 14 Dec 15 16:24
It doesn't matter whether it would or wouldn't go past. You could have the biggest dog in racing finish 2nd,if it was badly enough interfered with and the rules of racing were broken it should get the race
By:
elise
When: 14 Dec 15 16:25
that happened a few weeks ago trd, even the comms said something like 2nd doesn't like to go past but it got it in the stewards, can't rem the race though
By:
tomhunt
When: 14 Dec 15 16:27
the winner was 9's in the photo,some bad bad judges on here,LV showed the head on straight away which is unusual for them,sour grapes,correct call
By:
adamski
When: 14 Dec 15 16:27
Gayebury's jockey rode as though he thought he had to get back on the hurdles track, he deserved to lose it.
Wonder what he said in the stewards.
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 14 Dec 15 16:29
elise That is the rule. The stewards cannot bring a horses tendency to go past or not  into the equation when deciding to chuck a horse or not
By:
elise
When: 14 Dec 15 16:30
yes i know, just saying it was called on tv a few weeks ago in another example and got it in the stewards
By:
koikeeper
When: 14 Dec 15 16:30
The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into two possible instances of interference from half way up the home straight. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that in the first instance, approximately a furlong out, the winner, GAYEBURY, ridden by James Davies, had interfered with PRIME VENTURE (IRE), placed second, ridden by Conor Ring. They found that the interference was accidental, as the rider had made every effort to keep his mount straight.

In the second incident, inside the final half furlong, the Stewards found that GAYEBURY had interfered with PRIME VENTURE (IRE), and that the interference had improved GAYEBURY’s placing. They placed PRIME VENTURE (IRE) first and GAYEBURY second. The Stewards found Davies in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding, in that he had manoeuvred his horse right-handed carrying PRIME VENTURE (IRE) off its intended line for several strides, causing PRIME VENTURE (IRE) to lose ground and momentum and to be beaten by a short head. They suspended Davies for 2 days as follows: Monday 28 and Wednesday 30 December 2015.
By:
Wesdag
When: 14 Dec 15 16:31
A lot of pocket talking nonsense.

Was clear the decision could have gone either way so can't understand the shock expressed by some on here.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com