There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 109
|
By:
Ding dong surely
|
|
By:
knocked the sh1te out of the 2nd
|
|
By:
deserved the win, shame he'll get chucked out
|
|
By:
Please god they don't w@nk on about winning distance.
Horse was broadsided full on |
|
By:
Yep,changed the result imo
|
|
By:
going to get chucked
 |
|
By:
jumped left my hole, he was aimed left across the 2nd
|
|
By:
50\50........could go either way
|
|
By:
Nearly certainly the 2nd would have won,surely cost him.
|
|
By:
strange one this accidental interferance possibly i think will keep the race
|
|
By:
must keep it
|
|
By:
1.13 suggests not.
|
|
By:
1.1 to keep it
11s to get chucked Probably about right, but second was surely coming to win it with a second wind |
|
By:
distance too big to get chucked
|
|
By:
Certainly should get thrown out but our rules/stewards being what they are may well say that it 'didn't effect the placings' !
|
|
By:
the odds say he will keep it but the runner up would had won....
|
|
By:
7/1 sire to get it
|
|
By:
Backed the 2nd,think the winner keeps it.
|
|
By:
hulk23 05 Dec 15 15:07
deserved the win, shame he'll get chucked out post your bet on the 2nd its 8/1..tar |
|
By:
Interference at a fence when jumping is regarded as irrelevant to the result. Only interference on the flat is penalised and results changed.
|
|
By:
More chance of me supporting the red shíte than that getting chucked..
|
|
By:
how can you argue that almost knocking the runner-up over the stand didn't cost it less than a length ??
|
|
By:
cost him 1 1/2 length the interference
lost by 1/2 |
|
By:
Should be disqualified, but the bookmakers will have to pay out twice in the biggest race of the day, which under the obscene gross profits deal will cost horse racing thousands, so it won't, imo...
|
|
By:
3/4
|
|
By:
1.1 now
will be 1.3 in a few minutes  |
|
By:
roida, if it gets chucked out you were watching the waltons and missed it. luckily.
WAC |
|
By:
Should go, won't.
|
|
By:
not a chance of being disqualified
|
|
By:
Cant go under the rules as they are applied.
|
|
By:
IS.......agree......should be thrown out but almost certain to keep it
|
|
By:
unintensional interference
|
|
By:
Should be disqualified, but the bookmakers will have to pay out twice in the biggest race of the day, which under the obscene gross profits deal will cost horse racing thousands, so it won't, imo...
millhouse has summed it up |
|
By:
sire jumped to left at fence hampering 2nd...last 100yds 2nd gained nothing and sire was actually inchy away again..imposs to say 2nd would have won.
has hulk posted a bet yet? walofs  |
|
By:
Xmoney. According to the rules accidental interference is no different from any other kind. It only affects the possibility of a jockey getting
days. |
|
By:
Yet another example of the absurdity of our rules.
|
|
By:
Rule 54.7 In deciding whether the Stewards are satisfied that the interference improved the placing of the horse, the Stewards shall make no allowance for any ground which the incident may have cost the horse causing the interference.
and this rule still applies whether the interference is accidental or not. |
|
By:
Outpost - you can hear Cunninghams bull .. about how it "wasnt closing at the line" trying to persuade everyone.
|
|
By:
result stands
|