Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Article in todays R/Post about the bald one refusing to honour the terms of contracts of former t*te employees who are set to lose their jobs when bald fred close their call centre in Wigan, apparently he is refusing to pay them under the TUPE agreement for redundancy, Some are set to lose between £20,000 and £30,000. A truly dispicable man, if this is true.
Show More
come on you t ote staff ..fight it out with him...you must have a legal right under employment law
Could be a way of holding on to the money a little longer knowing full well he will have to pay in the end.
Dec 1, 2015 -- 3:38PM, seaside wrote:
Could be a way of holding on to the money a little longer knowing full well he will have to pay in the end.
a normal fred trick, when is someone going to expose or even better assassinate this ****
yes your suggestion billy worthy of serious consideration
And yet how many of the staff are in a union these days, considering we are always being told there's no need for them now and the subs are just a waste of time and money?
Why does Stevenson interview him on C4? The scum should not be allowed near a tv camera!
Sums up the Racing Post. When baldy was crying about race sponsorship and threatening to walk away from the game it was splashed across the front page but when he is trying to treat his staff like sh1te it is tucked away on the inside pages.The gravy train is alive and well.
No doubt he will be availing himself of the best advice - from the biggest Employment consultancy service in the country ...
http://www.peninsulagrouplimited.com/
Peninsula Business Services
PENINSULA BUSINESS SERVICES was set up in 1983 by Betfred founders Peter and Fred Done after a lack of legal support left them having to pay out more than £11,000 following an employment tribunal.
Today it is the UK’s largest employment law and health-and-safety consultancy, and advises more than 26,000 clients.
http://www.peninsulagrouplimited.com/
Peninsula Business Services
PENINSULA BUSINESS SERVICES was set up in 1983 by Betfred founders Peter and Fred Done after a lack of legal support left them having to pay out more than £11,000 following an employment tribunal.
Today it is the UK’s largest employment law and health-and-safety consultancy, and advises more than 26,000 clients.
The staff involved should consult their respective MPs and try to bring this despicable little man to heel.
he is a torie fuc£er, and will do anything to screw them people, his firm are renowned for being late payers in the business, a mate of mine worked for them for a few weeks..7months it took before he was paid...
Are you saying tories are the biggest welchers or are you just bigoted, as GB would say?
not in general,but he is just a rat,although I must say tories do not have a monopoly on greed like fred. Im not bigoted.
Why does Stevenson interview him on C4? The scum should not be allowed near a tv camera
The contemptible Stevenson is side salaried by Betfred for giving her tips on their voice network...
The contemptible Stevenson is side salaried by Betfred for giving her tips on their voice network...
billybongo • December 1, 2015 3:45 PM GMT
a normal fred trick, when is someone going to expose or even better assassinate this ****
a great idea billy, there'll be no shortage of volunteers
a normal fred trick, when is someone going to expose or even better assassinate this ****
a great idea billy, there'll be no shortage of volunteers
How ironic!!! Tony using the word "rat" about someone else.
is this the same bald cn ut who said he would never pay extra money for turf TV then relented,?
is this the same bald cnu t who tries to welch on winning bets, and then relents just before it go's to court.?
is this the same bald cnu t who tries to welch on winning bets, and then relents just before it go's to court.?
can you help yourself thickster..go find hole to crawl in like all trolls, again what are doing on a betting forum, you don't bet ? you don't have a opinion on betting or horses just criticise others after they have run?..sick man.
indeed dambuster..its sad he has his hands on the tote also..
Fred, obnoxious though he is, is not stupid so what's his reasoning for withholding redundancy money if it's legally due?
Costs involved in defending will be considerable so he'd only go down the route of defending if he thought he'd win.
Don't get it unless there is more to the story.
Costs involved in defending will be considerable so he'd only go down the route of defending if he thought he'd win.
Don't get it unless there is more to the story.
if they`re on a contract of employment and have been employed for over 2 years it`s the law innit,the bald s***house has to pay,iv`e been made redundant in the past and the company has to honour your redundancy settlement,as well as pay long term staff their notice entitlement,if the company goes into liquidation then you have to claim from the government,which takes a bit longer,hope the rancid old scrote get`s his **** kicked for trying to con the hoi poloi out of their money
As an aside what is a fecking idiot doing on here..
cufcno1 01 Dec 15 18:56 Joined: 20 Sep 11 | Topic/replies: 1,364 | Blogger: cufcno1's blog
Do as I say,not as I do,Fred is a total Tory waanker
Surely we are all Conservatives now apart from the feckless and pig ignorant.
cufcno1 01 Dec 15 18:56 Joined: 20 Sep 11 | Topic/replies: 1,364 | Blogger: cufcno1's blog
Do as I say,not as I do,Fred is a total Tory waanker
Surely we are all Conservatives now apart from the feckless and pig ignorant.
millhouse 01 Dec 15 17:13 Joined: 09 Dec 03 | Topic/replies: 5,061 | Blogger: millhouse's blog
Why does Stevenson interview him on C4? The scum should not be allowed near a tv camera
The bald fraudster should not be allowed either.
Why does Stevenson interview him on C4? The scum should not be allowed near a tv camera
The bald fraudster should not be allowed either.
He won't have shops in a few months anyway, cos he's not paying the levy, he's not going to sponsor races and he's going to take his money , and stuff racing, ....oh baldy, we will miss you...you welch ing bald co ck
I would love to be able to access one of his stores because the firm are clueless..
Just by opening the front door it would like accessing heaven..
(I live miles away from the nearest one before the usual blurts are on and have agoraphobia.)
Just a thought.
Just by opening the front door it would like accessing heaven..
(I live miles away from the nearest one before the usual blurts are on and have agoraphobia.)
Just a thought.
What a vile creature.
He is muti millionaire, and cannot be far off a billionaire.
Yet trying to screw his employees.
If he pays out will it affect his standard of living? Not in the slightest.
Whatever happened to capitalists who still had a social conscience?
A century ago, the Rowntree's factory was paying all its staff in York a higher-than-market wage. It wasn’t called a Living Wage then. Instead it was described as “productivity wages”.
"The Rowntrees were concerned that their employees had enough money to live on, but the decision to pay well was as much about business as it was about social responsibility.
Joseph Rowntree and son Seebohm Rowntree were not socialists. They were good capitalists who valued their commercial success. They believed that with that success came social responsibilities, because successful industry and good employment practices were both central in developing a good society for everyone.
In 1914, Seebohm Rowntree said: “Employers… must be compelled to abandon the false economy of low wages, and the nation need not distrust movements which strengthen the economic position of the workers.”
Bald Fred should take a leaf out of the Rowntree's book and pair fair and honest wages. Instead when his staff cannot afford to live he tries and takes more money of them in interest rates for loans.
He is muti millionaire, and cannot be far off a billionaire.
Yet trying to screw his employees.
If he pays out will it affect his standard of living? Not in the slightest.
Whatever happened to capitalists who still had a social conscience?
A century ago, the Rowntree's factory was paying all its staff in York a higher-than-market wage. It wasn’t called a Living Wage then. Instead it was described as “productivity wages”.
"The Rowntrees were concerned that their employees had enough money to live on, but the decision to pay well was as much about business as it was about social responsibility.
Joseph Rowntree and son Seebohm Rowntree were not socialists. They were good capitalists who valued their commercial success. They believed that with that success came social responsibilities, because successful industry and good employment practices were both central in developing a good society for everyone.
In 1914, Seebohm Rowntree said: “Employers… must be compelled to abandon the false economy of low wages, and the nation need not distrust movements which strengthen the economic position of the workers.”
Bald Fred should take a leaf out of the Rowntree's book and pair fair and honest wages. Instead when his staff cannot afford to live he tries and takes more money of them in interest rates for loans.
Not sure that we need a socialist rant on here but point taken...
Maleuk01, as I'm sure you know, the way business works these days is that companies will shaft their customers and employees in any way they can, and then use their PR frauds to try to turn their commercial cynicism into something else.
Stansted airport recently started charging people £2 to drop passengers off. Why are they doing it, according to their PR people - because they care about the environment, and want people to use public transport.
A well known chocolate manufacturer recently reduced the size of their confectionary while still charging the same price for it. Why are they doing this, according to the PR team - because they care about the health of the nation, and they want people to reduce their calorie intake.
Marks and Spencer were among the first retailers to charge for carrier bags. The money they collect from customers from charging for carriers all goes to environmental causes, say their PR people, because M and S 'care about the environment', - not mentioning the fact that millions of pounds a year in carrier bag costs have now been taken off their bottom line and passed on to the consumer (the recent government legislation requiring big retailers to charge for bags is just a cynical way for the government to make big business more profitable, masquerading as environmental concern, imo).
Google, perhaps the one big company in the world that most people actually like, have a mantra 'Don't be evil', which just about sums it all up, unfortunately...
Stansted airport recently started charging people £2 to drop passengers off. Why are they doing it, according to their PR people - because they care about the environment, and want people to use public transport.
A well known chocolate manufacturer recently reduced the size of their confectionary while still charging the same price for it. Why are they doing this, according to the PR team - because they care about the health of the nation, and they want people to reduce their calorie intake.
Marks and Spencer were among the first retailers to charge for carrier bags. The money they collect from customers from charging for carriers all goes to environmental causes, say their PR people, because M and S 'care about the environment', - not mentioning the fact that millions of pounds a year in carrier bag costs have now been taken off their bottom line and passed on to the consumer (the recent government legislation requiring big retailers to charge for bags is just a cynical way for the government to make big business more profitable, masquerading as environmental concern, imo).
Google, perhaps the one big company in the world that most people actually like, have a mantra 'Don't be evil', which just about sums it all up, unfortunately...
If the chocolate manufacturer above is so concerned about peoples health then why don't they stop making bars full of sugar?
Every individual should pursue it - pretty sure they'll win. With Christmas around the corner he may well attempt to settle. DO NOT ALLOW HIM TO DO THIS !!!!
Yes, the Peninsula route is an interesting one, having set up the company!!!
B****Fred are a disgrace in everything they do. Stick to your guns, you'll get full payout eventually
Yes, the Peninsula route is an interesting one, having set up the company!!!
B****Fred are a disgrace in everything they do. Stick to your guns, you'll get full payout eventually
Horrible man and company.But I remember when I worked for the prison service,a private company took over Birmhingam prison from HMP service All the staff were tupied ,the new company came in and put in horrible shift changes horrible holiday schemes cut wages massively and made around100 redundant with much less favourable terms than they were entitled to,who won the courts ruling? Well I can tell you it was not the prison staff.you see with Tupi there is so many clauses and get out that you have virtually no chance of getting a result.i worked at HMP Hatfield before I got motor neurone disease and we were going to be sold off so we got a very senior union rep to come from Londonds head office to talk us through it.after going through the ins and outs for 3 hours,he then told us you may as well rip up any Tupi agreement as it is not worth the paper it is writ on,I was forced to retire on hill health and after 8 years device I got £1000 pay off,fortunatlley the take over did not go ahead due to the fiddles the take over company had done, charging for looking after prisoners that had been dead for 2 years or more things like that
Horrible man and company.But I remember when I worked for the prison service,a private company took over Birmhingam prison from HMP service All the staff were tupied ,the new company came in and put in horrible shift changes horrible holiday schemes cut wages massively and made around100 redundant with much less favourable terms than they were entitled to,who won the courts ruling? Well I can tell you it was not the prison staff.you see with Tupi there is so many clauses and get out that you have virtually no chance of getting a result.i worked at HMP Hatfield before I got motor neurone disease and we were going to be sold off so we got a very senior union rep to come from Londonds head office to talk us through it.after going through the ins and outs for 3 hours,he then told us you may as well rip up any Tupi agreement as it is not worth the paper it is writ on,I was forced to retire on hill health and after 8 years device I got £1000 pay off,fortunatlley the take over did not go ahead due to the fiddles the take over company had done, charging for looking after prisoners that had been dead for 2 years or more things like that
It is the way the world is headed sadly. The inevitable product of the Thatcher/Reagan years.
Globalisation of the world and better communications with developing countries makes it all inevitable. Allowing developing countries to produce goods for much lower wages is the start of the developed nations downfall.
No one complains about being able to buy goods much cheaper due to Globalisation. But the inevitable consequences are that the wages of employers at lower skilled jobs have to reduce to compete. Hence the introduction of the living wage. Osborne in cloud cuckoo land believing that people can live without Tax Credits and not the relevant wage rises to compensate.
As for the case of employers redundancies, although the law exists it is very hard to overcome a bullying employer. Unless all the workers unite they can not hope to compete in the legal field. Without a Union to represent them this makes it so much harder and some staff will become disillusioned as the process continues. In the end the only winners are the lawyers. The employer will have no benefit other than shafting his former loyal employees.
It is a sad reflection of the world as it is progressing. Employment supply is far outstripping demand as the need for human workers ever decreases that can only mean the rights and entitlements of employees will ever decrease and the gap between rich and poor expands.
Globalisation of the world and better communications with developing countries makes it all inevitable. Allowing developing countries to produce goods for much lower wages is the start of the developed nations downfall.
No one complains about being able to buy goods much cheaper due to Globalisation. But the inevitable consequences are that the wages of employers at lower skilled jobs have to reduce to compete. Hence the introduction of the living wage. Osborne in cloud cuckoo land believing that people can live without Tax Credits and not the relevant wage rises to compensate.
As for the case of employers redundancies, although the law exists it is very hard to overcome a bullying employer. Unless all the workers unite they can not hope to compete in the legal field. Without a Union to represent them this makes it so much harder and some staff will become disillusioned as the process continues. In the end the only winners are the lawyers. The employer will have no benefit other than shafting his former loyal employees.
It is a sad reflection of the world as it is progressing. Employment supply is far outstripping demand as the need for human workers ever decreases that can only mean the rights and entitlements of employees will ever decrease and the gap between rich and poor expands.
Not sure we need yet another socialist rant on here..
The fact is that if millions of people had not been let into the Country then wages would have held up and the ridiculous idea of tax credits would never have taken hold.
The Unions were as much to blame as they are "Internationalists" and wanted more new members any which way they could...
The same goes as regard house prices and the alleged "Generation Rent" which would never have happened without mass immigration..
I laugh because we "should have been building 200 000 new houses a year" and yet a third of a million flood in.
Cause and effect.
You treat the cause not the effect...
The fact is that if millions of people had not been let into the Country then wages would have held up and the ridiculous idea of tax credits would never have taken hold.
The Unions were as much to blame as they are "Internationalists" and wanted more new members any which way they could...
The same goes as regard house prices and the alleged "Generation Rent" which would never have happened without mass immigration..
I laugh because we "should have been building 200 000 new houses a year" and yet a third of a million flood in.
Cause and effect.
You treat the cause not the effect...
here we go again..blame the unions..? you ask we can do without a socialist rant..so you are against what fred stands for and your a socialist? you don't know what a socialist is mate..the reason fred gets a political roasting and Stevenson..is they brought there politics on the morning line after the election?..fred claiming a tory victory was good for racing.....
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539