Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Apparently the jockey was rude to him and it was a terrible ride.
However, he can see no irony in slagging the jockey off on the internet and to anyone who will listen. Is this not rude also,,,
However, he can see no irony in slagging the jockey off on the internet and to anyone who will listen. Is this not rude also,,,
Show More
A pretty abysmal ride from Kent Desourmeux.
KD gave up his 1 draw to settle the horse well off the pace, traveled well into the race, made up his ground well enough, turned for home about 4 lengths off the leaders and then the jockey went into meltdown.
Never given a chance to go through with his effort and just left to make his own home...horse most likely had tougher work outs back in England.
Can understand why Noseda wasn't pleased especially when Kent probably told him to F Off afterwards.
just my opinion but it looked to me like Kent had lost his bottle....too scared to make his move.
Next time Noseda should advise his owner to shell out on Ryan Moore.
KD gave up his 1 draw to settle the horse well off the pace, traveled well into the race, made up his ground well enough, turned for home about 4 lengths off the leaders and then the jockey went into meltdown.
Never given a chance to go through with his effort and just left to make his own home...horse most likely had tougher work outs back in England.
Can understand why Noseda wasn't pleased especially when Kent probably told him to F Off afterwards.
just my opinion but it looked to me like Kent had lost his bottle....too scared to make his move.
Next time Noseda should advise his owner to shell out on Ryan Moore.
Maybe Kent had found his bottle again. It is not like it has not happened already this year.
The big question is why did he use him in the first place.
The big question is why did he use him in the first place.
Welcome to silent world of the punter Jeremy....
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539