Small fields = less money surely bet on the race = less levy = less prize money = less horse population = less runners = smaller fields
Does anyone know how Irish racing is funded? Prize money for the smaller races seems much higher.
Small fields = less money surely bet on the race = less levy = less prize money = less horse population = less runners = smaller fields Does anyone know how Irish racing is funded? Prize money for the smaller races seems much higher.
I think there is an argument for a reducation in fixtures but one a day is going too far. How about 2 UK jump meetings Monday to Friday 3 on a Saturday and 1 or 2 on a Sunday. If the field sizes are still too small, get rid of one Monday and one Tuesday fixture.
I think there is an argument for a reducation in fixtures but one a day is going too far.How about 2 UK jump meetings Monday to Friday3 on a Saturday and 1 or 2 on a Sunday.If the field sizes are still too small, get rid of one Monday and one Tuesday
It would be a great idea to have more AW racing, i really cant wait for Newcastle to get going. Then you will have the trinity complete, AW , flat jockeys, and North Of England.
It would be a great idea to have more AW racing, i really cant wait for Newcastle to get going.Then you will have the trinity complete, AW , flat jockeys, and North Of England.
Very few races have more than 5 horses with realistic chances so the rest are therte to help the bookmakers. The first at Fontwell today had 9 runners but only 2 were ever showing any ability so what difference would it have made if only 5 had started? The best races have between 6 and 10 runners with most of them still in with a chance for most of the way. Of course betting is part of the sport but in terms of crowd attendance, a horse Like Frankel winning every time at 1/4 puts thousands on the gate.
Very few races have more than 5 horses with realistic chances so the rest are therte to help the bookmakers. The first at Fontwell today had 9 runners but only 2 were ever showing any ability so what difference would it have made if only 5 had starte
Don't wish to argue old chap but is a 9 runner race where only 2 or 3 are going to be competitive a long way from helping the bookmakers? Although they bleat about races that have less than 8 runners every time you do get 8/9/10 runner races with only 3 live ones the managers' monitors are flashing all day long warning staff not to take a bet.
They basically want 8 runner BAGS horse races and if some people don't wake up they're going to get them.
Don't wish to argue old chap but is a 9 runner race where only 2 or 3 are going to be competitive a long way from helping the bookmakers? Although they bleat about races that have less than 8 runners every time you do get 8/9/10 runner races with onl
I'm the first race you are right, only two had any chance of winning but for most punters it would have been the toss of a coin to just over double your money. May as well play heads of tails with your mate.
If there are 8 or more runners then you will get many a punter both on and off course trying to pick one to run a place and come third. There are many races when that horse you pick may upstage the front two in the betting and win the race, meaning a nice return.
Take the beginners chase tomorrow in Ireland. Shaneshill is 1/4 and should win barring any accidents. If that race was in this country it would probably cut up into a 5 runner race. There are plenty of runners to pick up a place bet tomorrow.
Why there are so many handicaps in the uk with so few runners is even more shocking. At least in those races everyone has a more realistic chance of winning as you won't be stones behind the leader in the market.
I'm the first race you are right, only two had any chance of winning but for most punters it would have been the toss of a coin to just over double your money. May as well play heads of tails with your mate.If there are 8 or more runners then you wil
RE Begs/Nov Chases in Ireland, it might be helpful to some to remind them that Ireland still asks trainers to requalify their horses for a Chase mark (ie, 3 runs in wfa chases) before they can run in a handicap. It goes a long way to explaining the disparity.
If someone could let Julian Muscat know it would be helpful too, cheers.
RE Begs/Nov Chases in Ireland, it might be helpful to some to remind them that Ireland still asks trainers to requalify their horses for a Chase mark (ie, 3 runs in wfa chases) before they can run in a handicap. It goes a long way to explaining the
Ah I bet that frustrates Elliot and Martin as they have to run their horses out the back even more times.
Perhaps they should have more beginners, maiden races in the UK and force horses to be in the first third of the field to qualify for a handicap mark after three runs. If your horse is so bad it can't achieve that then after five runs give it a low mark.
That said prize money so poor these days that it costs more to train the horse and send it to the races for a few months than the horse than may win.
Always said the BHA should have its own betting exchange and use that to fund racing,
Ah I bet that frustrates Elliot and Martin as they have to run their horses out the back even more times.Perhaps they should have more beginners, maiden races in the UK and force horses to be in the first third of the field to qualify for a handicap
Unfortunately its the same 100 horses running against each other all winter long with differing results. Terribly boring to most, but suits the bookmakers. Bit like the same 37 runners at roulette running every day with differing results. Terribly boring to most, but suits the bookmakers.
Unfortunately its the same 100 horses running against each other all winter long with differing results.Terribly boring to most, but suits the bookmakers.Bit like the same 37 runners at roulette running every day with differing results.Terribly borin
The Headmaster, yes. I don't think there are enough horses to justify (for example) Saturdays with four NH meetings and midweeks afternoons with three, particularly when they are not always well spread out geographically.
The Headmaster, yes.I don't think there are enough horses to justify (for example) Saturdays with four NH meetings and midweeks afternoons with three, particularly when they are not always well spread out geographically.
Scrap daytime AW in the winter. What's the point? It they want racing on the flat out it on when it's dark.
If the racing is frozen off for days then just act quickly like Ireland and put on some new AW.
Scrap daytime AW in the winter. What's the point? It they want racing on the flat out it on when it's dark. If the racing is frozen off for days then just act quickly like Ireland and put on some new AW.
As usual people advocating their own personal preferences. I don't care for jump racing but understand that many others do. They need to realise that some of us prefer to bet on the AW.
As usual people advocating their own personal preferences. I don't care for jump racing but understand that many others do. They need to realise that some of us prefer to bet on the AW.
sparrow i was just having a bit of fun about the aw,over the years i have had a lot of enjoyment with it and both me and my wife have had horses named after us that won at wollybags and southwell in fact i am going to wolly next week.
its affected the juvenile races.sparrow i was just having a bit of fun about the aw,over the years i have had a lot of enjoyment with it and both me and my wife have had horses named after us that won at wollybags and southwell in fact i am going to
Up to a point maybe. Big field in the Juvenile hurdle today. Don't think having all weather makes much difference to the jumps cards really. Certainly not the chases anyway.
Up to a point maybe. Big field in the Juvenile hurdle today. Don't think having all weather makes much difference to the jumps cards really. Certainly not the chases anyway.
Foxy, it was aimed mainly at quantize, but usually there are always people wanting to knock the AW as if nothing untoward ever happened at Turf meetings. Good luck at Wolves next week.
Foxy, it was aimed mainly at quantize, but usually there are always people wanting to knock the AW as if nothing untoward ever happened at Turf meetings.Good luck at Wolves next week.
you used to get decent quality flat horses going over hurdles 2 that spring to mind are heighlin and kribensis,even the st leger winner moonax had a bash at it.
you used to get decent quality flat horses going over hurdles 2 that spring to mind are heighlin and kribensis,even the st leger winner moonax had a bash at it.
yes a very strange price back then, nowadays of course you will see many strange prices on bookmakers boards the fact most punters dont understand 14/5 and 23/20 doesnt seen to bother them.
kribensis was sent of favorite in his first attempt to be champion hurdler.
good morning sparrowyes a very strange price back then, nowadays of course you will see many strange prices on bookmakers boards the fact most punters dont understand 14/5 and 23/20 doesnt seen to bother them.kribensis was sent of favorite in his fir
Chelmsford..Ordinary run of the mill AW racing at a bookies sponsored course,
As Racing Post Editor..what meeting , prey, would you put in the centre pages of The Racing Post
we know what Racing Authorities think of NH Racing.MondayComing into prime NH seasonKempton...very decent NH Card..Easily main feature meetingLudlow....decent Monday NH cardChelmsford..Ordinary run of the mill AW racing at a bookies sponsored course,
The Headmaster 25 Nov 15 17:41 Don't wish to argue old chap but is a 9 runner race where only 2 or 3 are going to be competitive a long way from helping the bookmakers? Although they bleat about races that have less than 8 runners every time you do get 8/9/10 runner races with only 3 live ones the managers' monitors are flashing all day long warning staff not to take a bet.
They basically want 8 runner BAGS horse races and if some people don't wake up they're going to get them.
Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Service
I know what you mean
Just leave the bl00dy racing as it is Boxing day used to have 18 meetings and 16 abnd cos of snow once upon a time loads of small fields but nobody moaned then.
The Headmaster 25 Nov 15 17:41 Don't wish to argue old chap but is a 9 runner race where only 2 or 3 are going to be competitive a long way from helping the bookmakers? Although they bleat about races that have less than 8 runners every time you do
Just on the all-weather v Jumps debate I don't think there can be any doubt whatsoever that the domestic all-weather programme (particularly the new enhanced one) plus the rise of the Dubai Carnival and the Australian appetite for high end British middle distance bloodstock has had a massively detrimental effect on the Jumps population pipeline, particularly regarding Juvenile and Novice Hurdles. Given his paymasters and the Dubai connection, the irony that Ferguson is one of very few to send high class Flat stock Jumping should probably not be lost on us.
Unless Bloomfields provide it will we ever see an Alderbrook or Kribensis again? It's nice to dream, but...
Just on the all-weather v Jumps debate I don't think there can be any doubt whatsoever that the domestic all-weather programme (particularly the new enhanced one) plus the rise of the Dubai Carnival and the Australian appetite for high end British mi
uk yes only 2 in ireland but i do plan to visit a few more doubt i will do them all time not on my side and they dont seem to race 3 days on the run very often at different tracks other than if dundalk is on.
uk yes only 2 in ireland but i do plan to visit a few more doubt i will do them all time not on my side and they dont seem to race 3 days on the run very often at different tracks other than if dundalk is on.
i didnt set of with it as a target but it soon became one,i do use the train sometimes but on the whole you will need a car,the likes of kelso and fakenham are nowhere near train stations even places like newcastle ludlow wetherby and haydock you would need good taxi rides to get to the course.
i didnt set of with it as a target but it soon became one,i do use the train sometimes but on the whole you will need a car,the likes of kelso and fakenham are nowhere near train stations even places like newcastle ludlow wetherby and haydock you wou
As a punter you normally only want one horse to have a chance of winning. As a racing fan you want several. As a bookmaker presumably you want lots of no hopers that might draw some small bets from people who like the name.
As a punter you normally only want one horse to have a chance of winning. As a racing fan you want several. As a bookmaker presumably you want lots of no hopers that might draw some small bets from people who like the name.
Barton Bank Tomorrow's meeting at Bangor has failed to justify the running of 4 NH meetings on the same day.
On a course that can struggle for runners and declaring on heavy ground I don't think the field sizes at Bangor are too bad at all. Certainly has nothing to do with it being the 4th meeting, as that would have to infer that Bangor and Newbury, for instance, are competing for runners
Barton BankTomorrow's meeting at Bangor has failed to justify the running of 4 NH meetings on the same day.On a course that can struggle for runners and declaring on heavy ground I don't think the field sizes at Bangor are too bad at all. Certainly
The field sizes are very small.And now we are getting race clashes which pisses punters off no end and has a marked negative effect on liqudity and betting turnover. 4 NH meetings simply does not work.
The field sizes are very small.And now we are getting race clashes which pisses punters off no end and has a marked negative effect on liqudity and betting turnover.4 NH meetings simply does not work.
I've had a good look through today's programmes BB, and I can't see any races at Bangor that were clashing with other races elsewhere so can you explain how they're competing for runners?
The truth, if you'd care to admit it, is that Bangor would have had exactly the same shape of card no matter which day of the week you staged it....it has nothing to do with the fact it's on a Saturday!
I've had a good look through today's programmes BB, and I can't see any races at Bangor that were clashing with other races elsewhere so can you explain how they're competing for runners?The truth, if you'd care to admit it, is that Bangor would have
Come off it. The main reason for tiny fields on this card and at other meetings is that there are more fixtures than are required for competitive racing. For example, the was a 2m NH novive hurdle at Bangor and a 2m NH maiden hurdle at Newcastle catering for the same broad pool of horses. And it is not just about today. There would not be (for example) 5-runner bumpers and (as seen at Donny today) 6-runner handicap hurdles if there was a sensible amount of racing to cater for the available pool of horses. But, no. The BHA rightly comments on the need to increase field sizes and then fails to take the one measure that would ensure the aim.
Come off it.The main reason for tiny fields on this card and at other meetings is that there are more fixtures than are required for competitive racing.For example, the was a 2m NH novive hurdle at Bangor and a 2m NH maiden hurdle at Newcastle cateri