|
By:
Im not saying customers shouldnt complain when the product runs badly james
Im just wondering if this is how it occurs. Perhaps sedge was an example of atr not allocating much bandwidth for that meet and it being over exposed, ppl give up and it miraculously speeds up? |
|
By:
with respect of bf timing the product continuously.....I doubt that very very much.
They like all other companies dont waste.... |
|
By:
I hear ya dusty
I'd say it speeds up because people complain though and then Betfair get on the case to sort it out rather than because less people are using it. Would assume the same players would use all 3 live video tracks so in that case all 3 would be slow if it was down to traffic. Agree they don't time the product continuously, that's a given given the amount of times it's slow. They bloody well should time it though. Maybe not continuously but at least time them all once pre racing and make sure all are up to speed. They have a live video team apparently ![]() |
|
By:
It could be that atr do, when requested allocate more bandwidth for a course.
But I'm thinking that the reason one might be slow while another ok is that they are simply over exposed in relation to what's allocated each one. They probably have a decent idea how many users will be using for each event and cut it back to that number, so even pokey meets that no funker is that interested in go slow when interest peeks and exceeds allocation. BF and atr both wouldn't give anyone the steam off their p1ss and make it as 'efficient' as possible at all times, with the customer being the first to notice when it's them that suffer. It really is pitiful for a companies to defer responsibility and people should complain, but as you suggest they shouldn't have to. (I doubt they do have a LV team, as of recently they only had 1 person (usually just 2) working in the PC dept.) |
|
By:
I reckon it's Roida he probably has top secret tech equipment set up near the track
that intercepts the signal and delays it so he can have even more of an advantage.. could be wrong though ![]() |