Chelmsford LV slow

yah 2.5 to atr  - horrible track for me anyhow, so that makes my mind up for the evening.

same as above..i'm out that was ridiculous

LV pausing as well for Southwell nd Chelmsford...usual carp.

Wonder why this happens......I also find it strange that unless the LV breaks down completely most don't flag it up as this situation is far worse than no LV at all......when this situation happens,there should be scores tripping over themselves highlighting it.

makes you wonder if plenty are sat there actually accepting and playing it....keep that lark up and it will happen more and more regular.

regarding chelmsford maybe people have logged off,i found taunton to be behind rather than southwell today,we should highlight it more though,as you say a lot of people just accept it,you only have to look at that thread how long have you been on here to see how many don't bother their arris posting

Agreed...should always be highlighting the problems though....slow LV is a big one......as I said, if it was miles behind atr, there'd be 5 threads about it......2 secs ahead of ATR, which is a far far bigger problem....and there is one thread.

still slow for this race

Chelsmford was supposed to have gone fibre optic which means it should be one of the better LV tracks, along with Wolverhampton, Lingfield and Southwell. Imo it stinks why it is slower than even the normal tracks. There is no raw feed for Chelmsford which means track players have the biggest in-running advantage for years.

will pm them but i'm away now for the night,best of luck

duffy all recent Chelmsfords have been slow.

correct,TheFear

the fear,  when a track has fibre optics compared to one that doesn't, is there a difference in timing .
are the fibre optic pictures being deliberately slowed

surely if the pics are being sent via fibre optics , betfair live video should/could be about 0.5 behind live

As far as I know all the fibre optic tracks were faster on LV than a normal track. This was Ling, Wolver, Southwell and Donny. The rumour is Chelmsford and Towcester have gone fibre optic. Chelmsford seems slower and Towcester seems the same as it always was. Don't know any more than that m8.

Windsor I missed out.

it was 3.3secs infront of atr when i timed it last week  normally SIS tracks are 5-5.3s ahead of atr on LV

it is even slower today at around 2.8s

obviously last weeks added track advantage wasnt enough

thanks TF

Seems significantly slower than I've noticed Chelmsford before.

looks like you need to tweak it the other way

fine today!

yep,be careful with meydan though it's about 3 secs behind ruk

slightly slower than other atr feeds

but a lot better and playable

got ruk

ttt