|
By:
on me laptop
|
|
By:
nb..keep up with the wild guessing.
|
|
By:
and Kelvin Hall ( and speaking of Arnie - the name of the bloke who played the Predator) will feckin lose.
|
|
By:
you will know doubt get 1 right before long you sill leek hunt
|
|
By:
its not guessin, its brainy workin. and much safer than laying 1000's and backin 1.01's matey. How's the plastering job going? Most work you right arms seen in a long time I reckon.
|
|
By:
ah.. how I will miss the interlectual banter...
![]() |
|
By:
yay... just another 38 winners to go...
|
|
By:
How do you decide which other ones to lay in the races lex ? You say you try and get the favs done below BFSP but sometimes will lay another one in the race?
|
|
By:
I don't know how the hell you get matched on enough
you've done very well to make this last. I'm amazed that there are not 'too many' others trying to do exactly the same thing (ie nick some in play off the %BFSP favs) liquidity in play is shoite now too |
|
By:
GL to you if you can make it pay,
Does seem quite an effort to lose £50 in 12 days though |
|
By:
when you see the fav is going to come home then lay one that obv isnt. or dutch it with one outside of the bookies mark up. there's many ways as I ve told you before. Also when you miss a match staking and managment is key. Most try to stake to recoveer the loss. You dont, only the spread.
|
|
By:
when you see the fav is going to come home then lay one that obv isn't
what odds are you laying the one that 'obviously isn't going to win' ![]() |
|
By:
it has been a bit of a drag to be honest for the past few weeks. But look at the figures.. sure Ive lost a bit - but Ive also turned a 240% profit in 10 days. The trick is keeping it! Can usually double a bank within a month though.
|
|
By:
liquidity is a prob is youre betting like Roida in ££KKK's. If your happy making a 100's and a bit of fun (not like today mind) then its fine.
You can make 10% of your bank most days. |
|
By:
what odds are you laying the one that 'obviously isn't going to win'
just enough to lower the liability. You can see whats happening just by watching the odds flick around. if your liability is say 100 you only need to lower it by a tenner or to make the spread required. Its easier than it sounds. |
|
By:
I'll be laying Khaleesy at 1.75 in a minute.
|
|
By:
please don't say told you so if it gets done we all know eventually a few favs will get beat
![]() |
|
By:
I would trial this 15% on a thread but you do other stuff so it cannot be tested
|
|
By:
you double your money in a month ?
come on lex - 5% per month , compounded is worth 80% on bank in a year , which is absolutely brilliant . And you double it in a month ???? |
|
By:
I dont need to. the fact that I'm laying below ISP ( or reducing to the same effect the liability) is all that's required.
It drifting so may ease the bet a little.. I dont think I can test it to be honest as its a method rather than a ridgid system. and posting would be seen as aftertiming really. Thats why I tend to post just prior to the off when I think the numbers are pointing to a fav losing. Maybe a video of a days work would do it. |
|
By:
1.75 IR is a big % lEX
|
|
By:
Yes. double ya munny.
striding legs. thats why I'm easing the bet a little.. |
|
By:
anuvver bleedin fav. un believable. you goto laff..
|
|
By:
I cannot follow your rules mate
so I wish you luck |
|
By:
and yes we are due a spell of favs losing soon
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Lex - please explain sir , youve lost me .
say the next fav opens up at 3.05 , what do you do ? |
|
By:
ta.
and Ive had enough of this beating to I will return tomorrow. btw - do you keep records of the results? if you feel inclined plot the strike rate in a graph over 28 days. then take a random 28 day period and then another. Zealot. You lay it with a liability at approx 15% of industry starting price. 3.05 ISP = 2/1 = 2.7 which is only a few ticks. The average fav is 2.75 and most under 3.5 will shorten by 15%. if they dont, then stake to get back the spread not the whole loss. But never lay a fav much bigger than ISP. it will bite you. |
|
By:
lex I've looked at tens of thousands of observations of favs over the past decade
I know there is no pattern to them but obviously if you keep saying the next one should lose it will eventually |
|
By:
actually thats not what I say at all. and youre not making the right observations. look at the peaks and troughs and the frequency of the cycles. You will see a pattern. Even today will be in the pattern which will emerge of the next few days when the strike rate settlesdown to the mean once more. My guess is about 10 days.
|
|
By:
You can plot the ISP of the favs as well, you will get a similar picture.
|
|
By:
so if you can predict these cycles why don't you only play when they are in your favour LEX ?
|
|
By:
Mean reversion? yes I do some of that and the longer the cycle sample the more accurate it is, but the less you bet. A cycle of 20 works quite well.
On balance I go for high turn over. Plus I love betting. anyways, g'nite. makes sure the bed bugs dont get ya. |
|
By:
the logic of your laying at below SP is of course extremely sound, if achieved consistently enough this MUST yield profits.
the cyclical and predictive elements of the distribution of favs is complete guff if 47 favs win in the next 100 races it doesn't mean this bias will be reset within the next 100 races |
|
By:
no. it will be a bit longer than that, probably closer to 300
nite |
|
By:
good night
|
|
By:
the few times I've been in a casino you'll see a character noting down the numbers coming up on the roulette wheel. On the basis that there must be a pattern. They don't look very happy.
|
|
By:
Dont get me started on casinos.... horses aint nuffin like casinos (fixed odds) you cant win with fixed odds, you just get lucky.
Bookmaker events are a completely, and literally, different animal. |
|
By:
lex thinks that the bookmakers can determine 'false' favs to reset the pattern
this is the biggest thing I have disagreed with |
|
By:
geez.... lex......
|
|
By:
saturday was a cracker....though
|