Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
tons of sobs
09 Nov 15 14:03
Joined:
Date Joined: 29 Jun 08
| Topic/replies: 1,965 | Blogger: tons of sobs's blog
Lights out.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 93
By:
jigjed
When: 09 Nov 15 14:03
will that be classed as a runner
By:
aasbff
When: 09 Nov 15 14:03
Was it under starters orders? I've layed it.
By:
southlodge
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
can never have been under orders
By:
hulk23
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
was never going to start, very unlucky if you've done your cash on the jolly
By:
BARROWBOY
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
Did he come under orders?
By:
themover
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
shirley a non-runner
By:
jigjed
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
flag was raised
By:
IDKW
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
Of course it came under orders.........how can it not have been?
By:
Poppydog.
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
Seemed to be under orders, however he was never really on the actual course
By:
Breedingmad
When: 09 Nov 15 14:04
Took no part
By:
Keefter
When: 09 Nov 15 14:05
very confusing start. you can't have this make your mind up if it was a runner or not after the race has started.
By:
Big Boss
When: 09 Nov 15 14:05
9.42 BFSP
By:
jmdc
When: 09 Nov 15 14:05
Tried to race with the field.  In the hands of the starter I'm afraid!
By:
adge
When: 09 Nov 15 14:05
betfair sp 9.42
By:
tonyagana
When: 09 Nov 15 14:05
If he is classed as a runner given the build up then it will be a complete farce.
By:
Breedingmad
When: 09 Nov 15 14:06
That was RoidaWink
By:
Swardean
When: 09 Nov 15 14:06
Pretty sure they will call it a non-runner, they did something simiilar recently.
By:
Big Boss
When: 09 Nov 15 14:06
Paddy Flowers will refund all the mugs
By:
Keefter
When: 09 Nov 15 14:07

Nov 9, 2015 -- 2:06PM, Swardean wrote:


Pretty sure they will call it a non-runner, they did something simiilar recently.


yeah i got done on that one, can't remember the exact runner, but very similar circumstances.

By:
Barton Bank
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
Under the rules of racing that horse should be deemed a runner. If the stewards choose to ignore the rules that's up to them.
By:
IDKW
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
How can they call it a NR?
Scholfield was mounted at the start.
Horse is a pig, and anyone that backed him pre-race needs to give themselves a good talking to!!!
By:
southlodge
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
JOCKEY AND TRAINER NEED A SMACK THEY SHOULD HAVE REMOVED THE HORSE
By:
ALIEN SEX FIEND
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
Laid it, he lined up in my opinion, it was a lay to nothing virtually. No guarantee to win if he started, was always likely to give ground at the
start in that mood................and the brucie bonus, may not start. If he is declared a runner in, which he should, punters were ripped off, he
was never going, and if like me you laid it, and it is declared a non runner, disgraceful. Horse lined up with field, whilst being held.

Have said on here many times, if a horse makes no attempt to jump first.............NON RUNNER.
By:
BARROWBOY
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
IKDW,calm down,just a question,havent got access to pictures at the mo
By:
Kelly Brook
When: 09 Nov 15 14:08
Be amazed if it wasn't classed as a runner although it was obvious to anyone with half a brain he wasnt interested and should never have been led to the start.
By:
hulk23
When: 09 Nov 15 14:10
Cash Out no longer available due to late withdrawal
By:
tonyagana
When: 09 Nov 15 14:11
slybet given it as a NR.
By:
eastendking
When: 09 Nov 15 14:11
sportinglife say it's a runner
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 09 Nov 15 14:12
Looking at the replay, a 'runner' imo
By:
Keefter
When: 09 Nov 15 14:12
don't care much about the people that lose their winning lay bets on a horse that was obviously not going to start but it has wider implications, anyone who did a back to lay on the winner will be unhappy when they realise they've laid it IR at a HIGHER price than they backed it prerace through no fault of their own. There should be no confusion here, it's either led away and dismounted and then they race or its under oders,m zero room for a grey area here imo
By:
the dealer
When: 09 Nov 15 14:12
usual chaos and lack of info, no doubt will take an age to make a decision
By:
blunder
When: 09 Nov 15 14:13
Absloute certain runner ,otherwise the starter would have had it removed from the rest of the field.
By:
blunder
When: 09 Nov 15 14:13
*absolute
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 09 Nov 15 14:14
Looking at the replay, a 'runner' imo

+1

should deffo be a runner

I neither backed or layed it
By:
the dealer
When: 09 Nov 15 14:14
nothing is absolute in these cases imo
By:
BARROWBOY
When: 09 Nov 15 14:16
betfair settled as runner,laid it been paid
By:
Keefter
When: 09 Nov 15 14:16
settled as a runner
By:
muzzle
When: 09 Nov 15 14:16
runner
By:
Keefter
When: 09 Nov 15 14:16
right decision imo.
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com