Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
roida
13 Oct 15 14:57
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Feb 11
| Topic/replies: 18,356 | Blogger: roida's blog
Sad
Pause Switch to Standard View amended result at curragh
Show More
Loading...
Report elise October 13, 2015 2:58 PM BST
that's what i heard, saw 7s just before it closed
Report layingisthewayforward October 13, 2015 3:00 PM BST
Post ya bet ysfc
Report elise October 13, 2015 3:02 PM BST
me?

Horse Racing / Curr 13th Oct : 6f Hcap     13-Oct-15 14:35     13-Oct-15 14:59     562.48
Report handtorofe October 13, 2015 3:03 PM BST
shocking decision
Report onlooker October 13, 2015 3:04 PM BST
Last Price matched in Stewards Enquiry betting

First Past the Post = 1.17

The other horse - eventual winner, courtesy of Stewards = 7.0
Report roida October 13, 2015 3:05 PM BST
i didnt see replay till was amended...strange it went on for an age yet shortened 1.25>>1.17 then reversed.

poor decision imo
Report Davey Carlson October 13, 2015 3:07 PM BST
It appeared to have a long time to go past :(
Report Wesdag October 13, 2015 3:08 PM BST
What do I always say about Irish stewards...

Steer clear.
Report handtorofe October 13, 2015 3:15 PM BST
Clear daylight for 3 furlong and couldnt go past,how can anyone say that would of won without the bump.If Smullen was on the other one would have stood for sure.
Report Wesdag October 13, 2015 3:18 PM BST
Smullen v Leonard (10).

Hmmm.
Report EVILROYSLADE October 14, 2015 4:11 AM BST
Just watched the replay.The original runner up wouldn't have got past at any stage.An abominable decision. Stewards? A bit like giving a bunch of kids the keys to a school tuck shop.
Report carrot1960 October 14, 2015 7:48 AM BST
Only just seen the thread, what a shocking decision , and i am  not talking  through my  pocket even though i backed the horse  but that was a joke , the promoted horse initially edges towards clear focus , the pair then duel for the lead clear focus does nudge the runner up but no more  than that before ending up comfortably ahead at the line.
Report flukes October 14, 2015 9:42 AM BST
Carrot - '' I am not talking through my pocket even though I backed the horse''?
Report carrot1960 October 14, 2015 1:16 PM BST
You will find your if you say anything about a stewards decision or a poor ride it's "pocket talk"
Report blunder October 14, 2015 1:26 PM BST
I  backed the original 2nd ,thought there may be a stewards , but saw the head on and thought the winner was the best horse .I was very surprised
the result was altered,I think I was very lucky .Poor decision by the stewards.
Report jamesdean October 14, 2015 2:07 PM BST
Smullen v Leonard (10).


This.
Report dave1357 October 14, 2015 2:19 PM BST
Does the "must be sure that the interfered with horse would have won" stipulation apply in Ireland?
Report blunder October 14, 2015 2:26 PM BST
there is no such stipulation
Report dave1357 October 14, 2015 2:37 PM BST
ty - so any kind of substantial interference would mean amended result?
Report roida October 14, 2015 4:35 PM BST
that wasnt substantial
Report Fatandprotein October 14, 2015 8:04 PM BST
Worst decision for many a day. Wins 1/2l easing up.
3 things:
Young Leonard(10) - Riding for small stable, stewards decide to teach him a lesson, while he is still in nappies.
P. Smullen - well able to put up a good case.
Prince Saif Aldin Al Saud - Winning owner!!!!
Report handtorofe October 14, 2015 8:46 PM BST
Interesting that no one putting up an argument for the reversal which is very unusual on here.
A yes or no vote would be interesting.
Should it have been reversed Yes/no

1. no
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com