Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
roida
13 Oct 15 14:57
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Feb 11
| Topic/replies: 18,356 | Blogger: roida's blog
Sad
Pause • Switch to Standard View amended result at curragh
Show More
Loading...
Report elise • October 13, 2015 2:58 PM BST
that's what i heard, saw 7s just before it closed
Report layingisthewayforward • October 13, 2015 3:00 PM BST
Post ya bet ysfc
Report elise • October 13, 2015 3:02 PM BST
me?

Horse Racing / Curr 13th Oct : 6f Hcap     13-Oct-15 14:35     13-Oct-15 14:59     562.48
Report handtorofe • October 13, 2015 3:03 PM BST
shocking decision
Report onlooker • October 13, 2015 3:04 PM BST
Last Price matched in Stewards Enquiry betting

First Past the Post = 1.17

The other horse - eventual winner, courtesy of Stewards = 7.0
Report roida • October 13, 2015 3:05 PM BST
i didnt see replay till was amended...strange it went on for an age yet shortened 1.25>>1.17 then reversed.

poor decision imo
Report Davey Carlson • October 13, 2015 3:07 PM BST
It appeared to have a long time to go past :(
Report Wesdag • October 13, 2015 3:08 PM BST
What do I always say about Irish stewards...

Steer clear.
Report handtorofe • October 13, 2015 3:15 PM BST
Clear daylight for 3 furlong and couldnt go past,how can anyone say that would of won without the bump.If Smullen was on the other one would have stood for sure.
Report Wesdag • October 13, 2015 3:18 PM BST
Smullen v Leonard (10).

Hmmm.
Report EVILROYSLADE • October 14, 2015 4:11 AM BST
Just watched the replay.The original runner up wouldn't have got past at any stage.An abominable decision. Stewards? A bit like giving a bunch of kids the keys to a school tuck shop.
Report carrot1960 • October 14, 2015 7:48 AM BST
Only just seen the thread, what a shocking decision , and i am  not talking  through my  pocket even though i backed the horse  but that was a joke , the promoted horse initially edges towards clear focus , the pair then duel for the lead clear focus does nudge the runner up but no more  than that before ending up comfortably ahead at the line.
Report flukes • October 14, 2015 9:42 AM BST
Carrot - '' I am not talking through my pocket even though I backed the horse''?
Report carrot1960 • October 14, 2015 1:16 PM BST
You will find your if you say anything about a stewards decision or a poor ride it's "pocket talk"
Report blunder • October 14, 2015 1:26 PM BST
I  backed the original 2nd ,thought there may be a stewards , but saw the head on and thought the winner was the best horse .I was very surprised
the result was altered,I think I was very lucky .Poor decision by the stewards.
Report jamesdean • October 14, 2015 2:07 PM BST
Smullen v Leonard (10).


This.
Report dave1357 • October 14, 2015 2:19 PM BST
Does the "must be sure that the interfered with horse would have won" stipulation apply in Ireland?
Report blunder • October 14, 2015 2:26 PM BST
there is no such stipulation
Report dave1357 • October 14, 2015 2:37 PM BST
ty - so any kind of substantial interference would mean amended result?
Report roida • October 14, 2015 4:35 PM BST
that wasnt substantial
Report Fatandprotein • October 14, 2015 8:04 PM BST
Worst decision for many a day. Wins 1/2l easing up.
3 things:
Young Leonard(10) - Riding for small stable, stewards decide to teach him a lesson, while he is still in nappies.
P. Smullen - well able to put up a good case.
Prince Saif Aldin Al Saud - Winning owner!!!!
Report handtorofe • October 14, 2015 8:46 PM BST
Interesting that no one putting up an argument for the reversal which is very unusual on here.
A yes or no vote would be interesting.
Should it have been reversed Yes/no

1. no
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com