There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
|
By:
that's what i heard, saw 7s just before it closed
|
|
By:
Post ya bet ysfc
|
|
By:
me?
Horse Racing / Curr 13th Oct : 6f Hcap 13-Oct-15 14:35 13-Oct-15 14:59 562.48 |
|
By:
shocking decision
|
|
By:
Last Price matched in Stewards Enquiry betting
First Past the Post = 1.17 The other horse - eventual winner, courtesy of Stewards = 7.0 |
|
By:
i didnt see replay till was amended...strange it went on for an age yet shortened 1.25>>1.17 then reversed.
poor decision imo |
|
By:
It appeared to have a long time to go past :(
|
|
By:
What do I always say about Irish stewards...
Steer clear. |
|
By:
Clear daylight for 3 furlong and couldnt go past,how can anyone say that would of won without the bump.If Smullen was on the other one would have stood for sure.
|
|
By:
Smullen v Leonard (10).
Hmmm. |
|
By:
Just watched the replay.The original runner up wouldn't have got past at any stage.An abominable decision. Stewards? A bit like giving a bunch of kids the keys to a school tuck shop.
|
|
By:
Only just seen the thread, what a shocking decision , and i am not talking through my pocket even though i backed the horse but that was a joke , the promoted horse initially edges towards clear focus , the pair then duel for the lead clear focus does nudge the runner up but no more than that before ending up comfortably ahead at the line.
|
|
By:
Carrot - '' I am not talking through my pocket even though I backed the horse''?
|
|
By:
You will find your if you say anything about a stewards decision or a poor ride it's "pocket talk"
|
|
By:
I backed the original 2nd ,thought there may be a stewards , but saw the head on and thought the winner was the best horse .I was very surprised
the result was altered,I think I was very lucky .Poor decision by the stewards. |
|
By:
Smullen v Leonard (10).
This. |
|
By:
Does the "must be sure that the interfered with horse would have won" stipulation apply in Ireland?
|
|
By:
there is no such stipulation
|
|
By:
ty - so any kind of substantial interference would mean amended result?
|
|
By:
that wasnt substantial
|
|
By:
Worst decision for many a day. Wins 1/2l easing up.
3 things: Young Leonard(10) - Riding for small stable, stewards decide to teach him a lesson, while he is still in nappies. P. Smullen - well able to put up a good case. Prince Saif Aldin Al Saud - Winning owner!!!! |
|
By:
Interesting that no one putting up an argument for the reversal which is very unusual on here.
A yes or no vote would be interesting. Should it have been reversed Yes/no 1. no |