Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 189 comments are related to the topic:
Surely can't take that away....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 189
By:
Gagging
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
Fair result - about time stewards looked at the bigger picture and dont reward potentially dangerous riding
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13

Sep 12, 2015 -- 4:12PM, appformat wrote:


how big did BB go during the stewards?


1/2 v 2/1 early on settled around 1/3 v 3/1 got to 1/7 v 7/1 then drifted to 1/3 v 3/1 at off

By:
ashleigh
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
could not understand the prices on here in the stewards, most of the time 1/5 and 5/1 surely should have been much closer than that which ever way it went.
By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
Beckett was wonderful then Sheik f should tell them to feck off and take his money elsewhere. We'll get the usual justification and hope sheikh f appeals and heads role.
By:
tommo1000
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
all stewards are gin slinging old **** who got b****d up the a**e at eton
By:
StewB
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
if even if they win appeal, not good for puners who backed it....lose when you win not good
By:
Kriskin
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
The BHA Stewards have caused this farce today.  U cannot have the same incidents going unpunished in other races. The rules need changed
By:
p_r_e_m_i_e_r__f_a_n_t_a_s_y
When: 12 Sep 15 16:13
COD trying to justify it and the fkin tactics his rancid mob have employed in the past
By:
summoner
When: 12 Sep 15 16:14
Right decision for me, and good to see stewards not bottling it for once.
By:
lmfao
When: 12 Sep 15 16:14
i repeat

lmfao
lmfao 12 Sep 15 16:10 Joined: 07 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 5,058 | Blogger: lmfao's blog
there appear to be many forum posters here who know very little about stewards enquiries LaughCool
By:
trader pj
When: 12 Sep 15 16:14

Sep 12, 2015 -- 4:12PM, p_r_e_m_i_e_r__f_a_n_t_a_s_y wrote:


disgrace


A disgrace I agree. Never seen anything like it

By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 12 Sep 15 16:14
The RULES if only they were adhered to consistently.
By:
quay_street
When: 12 Sep 15 16:15
The American decision is going to have repercussions. The carryon in the UK of blindly giving it nearly 100% of the time to the winner, no matter what happens, is completely contrary to the practice in other horse racing jurisdictions. Sooner or later, the UK rules will be brought into line.
By:
SportsDen
When: 12 Sep 15 16:15
That is an utter disgrace and I've backed Bondi Beach antepost. There's no consistency in stewards enquiries in this country. To anyone who has backed the filly, you've been robbed!
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Sep 15 16:15
what is shows just speak like a tw@t to stewards makes no difference
By:
Steamship
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
Those saying it was the correct decision will have made plenty on the stewards then.
By:
Applewine
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
Feel for the trainer, but serves them grinning bookies reps in the background when Chappers was interviewing Beckitt after the filly passed the post
By:
trader pj
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
that Irish prat Colin was overplaying his case big time
By:
brockville
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
At last the stewards showing some balls.

To many jockeys deliberately breaking the rules to gain advantage knowing they will keep the race and maybe get a riding ban.

I agree regards the inconsistency with these decisions but it doesn't make this decision the wroing one.

Not talking through my pocket as I bet the 3rd.
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
You see worse that than every week without the horse getting demoted.

Without a shadow of doubt the best horse won and that is a disgraceful decision
By:
barstool
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
Dirty riding by O'Donoghue rewarded. He was more intent on keeping in Simple Verse than riding to win for half a furlong.
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Sep 15 16:16
take that trophy and your cap and fk off utter count
By:
casemoney
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
Need a computer programme like Hawkeye that judges interference distance lost etc ..These idiots make it up as they go along
By:
koikeeper
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
Steamship 12 Sep 15 16:16
Those saying it was the correct decision will have made plenty on the stewards then.


Didnt have a bet in the race or on the enquiry, but thought it was the right decision.
By:
oneyallbeenwaiting4
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
The one good thing we had could be gone now, UK Stewards have just abandoned previous protocol.

Going to be up in the air now every time there is a stewards, no consistency.
By:
Aladdin Sane
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
Whatever we may think of French/American racing, one thing's for sure, like it or not, they're consistent when it comes to enquiries and you tend to know where you stand with the rules..
By:
trader pj
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
I can't remember such uproar about a stewards
By:
roggrain
When: 12 Sep 15 16:17
Our rules are a dog's breakfast. There is absolutely no consistency. Racing in Britain is run by nincompoops.
By:
Steamship
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18
How did Lord Windermere keep the Gold Cup?
By:
trader pj
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18

Sep 12, 2015 -- 4:17PM, roggrain wrote:


Our rules are a dog's breakfast. There is absolutely no consistency. Racing in Britain is run by nincompoops.


half of them are senile

By:
geordie1956
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18
Probably the right result but the inconsistency of the stewards is worth an enquiry of itself
By:
quay_street
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18
How do you know the "best horse won"?
By:
polab
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18
Anyone know if 365 pay out on both?
By:
Vubiant
When: 12 Sep 15 16:18
People here seem to assume that this decision was wrong and that the BB York decision was right.
I would have thought that it's the other way round- and BB did beat Storm the Stars fair and square this time.
By:
dalbers
When: 12 Sep 15 16:19
Correct decision today ... and it shows up even more what a ridiculous "result stands" verdict there was in the Voltigeur that some of you on here are clinging onto as an excuse for why today's verdict should have stood as well.

If there hadn't been that recent ridiculous non-verdict, I doubt there would be anything like the fuss there's going to be now ... so aim your vitriol at the York stewards' incompetence rather than the Doncaster stewards' verdict today.
By:
koikeeper
When: 12 Sep 15 16:19
trader pj 12 Sep 15 16:17
I can't remember such uproar about a stewards


Cecils horse in the guineas ?
By:
lmfao
When: 12 Sep 15 16:19
Best Horse won
end of
By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 12 Sep 15 16:20
HOW CAN YOU BET WITH CONFIDENCE?
By:
Cider
When: 12 Sep 15 16:20
They're supposed to be sure that BB would have won without the interference. Will definitely be overturned on appeal, as the rules were not implemented correctly.
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Sep 15 16:20
bondi beach is an absolute fkin boat hth
Page 3 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com