Stewards York

agree

Stewards enquiry a race of time, stewards won't overturn anything. Can pretty much do what you want out there.

agree

Jockey never changed whip hand, carried him across the track....should be overturned...but won't

More chance of Gleneagles running today than British stewards swapping the result, no wonder Bondi Beach could not get past .

i can see this being changed

Runner up never stood a chance of getting past the winner with them bumps and being carried across. Should be given to Bondi Beach but this is british racing so no chance. Ridiculous.

Jockey ban, keeps the race as you cant be sure the runner up would had won.

didnt imptove its position..best horse won on day...1/6 a steal imo

This would be 1.08 at a gaff track?

Same thing happened yesterday cut right across can't see why they won't make the same decision

how much you avvin roy dah

i laid 2nd at big price 50yds out so hands tied to an extent

Best horse wins by half a length.

Very generous prices imo.

Interesting to Liston to jockeys better not change

Classic case of a moderate jockey panicking when a group 2 was at stake imo

cut to the stewards half asleep with a brandy and a cigar please.

History says he will keep it but today may be different

If they do change it i want my money from Sky Lantern back from a few years ago. ta

Keeps it surely?

cant be a person in the world can say the 2nd would have won...nonsense

winner keeps it, other horse was never going past at any stage

The 2nd had loads of chances to win it. Didn't.

STANDS

stands

Joseph should be banned for talking crap in the stewarts.

Well done good to be on the right side for a change

Well I never ....utterly pointless even having stewards in this country.

the longer it takes the more they makes

Unless you pull out a gun and shoot the other jockey, nothing gets overturned in this country

626, you know the rules so why bleat?

plenty been overturned if need be.

Once you heard the words 'possible interference' from the stewards you knew the whole thing would be a farce. Did they not watch the race?

yes ..twice

So why say possible interference when they already knew there was interference. Twice.

It's all too silly for words. Imagine if international athletes and swimmers the world over were told that when you come to England there won't be lanes.

Thought Cosgrave came over as very dislikable in the enquiry

I think that result would have stood even under the old rules. The 2nd was heading across diagonally of his own accord. They raced on parallel lines, across the track, until the wunner bumped him, but it made little or no difference. If Joseph had had his whip in his left hand, it would have been a different story.

Aug 19, 2015 -- 3:31PM, Piet wrote:

Thought Cosgrave came over as very dislikable in the enquiry

If that was a handicap or maiden on a normal Wednesday he would've straightened the horse and lost the race and not care. An utter cretin.

The pocket talkers should stick to US racing where their horse will always get the race in the stewards room.

Another thing re this 'if it's over a head you won't get it' idea. So if you get a bad bump and lose a head you get it. But if you get a bump that costs you half a length, the distance you lose by, tough luck? Ludicrous.

the 2nd lost as much ground veering across track as winner..it DID not cost the 2nd the race.