Richard Hughes, to his credit, aired his views on such poor racing and the corruption within it. That said when a horse rated 89 that runs on a Saturday at a big track like Haydock is the subject of a laying sting (I liked the comment of one poster ' no price was too big')what chance does a punter, not in the 'know', have ?
Richard Hughes, to his credit, aired his views on such poor racing and the corruption within it. That said when a horse rated 89 that runs on a Saturday at a big track like Haydock is the subject of a laying sting (I liked the comment of one poster '
"who came here in preference to Sandown for some easier ground, proved friendless in the betting and was never seriously in the hunt"
empassant - are we talking? - here? ..."who came here in preference to Sandown for some easier ground, proved friendless in the betting and was never seriously in the hunt"
Yes Tournament.No question what went on but BHA and the stewards turn a blind eye to such things because the defrauding taking place is likely only against the punter through the exchange and not the establishment.
Yes Tournament.No question what went on but BHA and the stewards turn a blind eye to such things because the defrauding taking place is likely only against the punter through the exchange and not the establishment.