There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 15
|
By:
Good to soft
 |
|
By:
The time and the visual impression would suggest otherwise. Even if they change it the official formbook will inaccurately record the opener as good to firm. This sort of ineptitude/dishonesty is the sort of thing the BHA should be looking into.
|
|
By:
Exactly. It's just ****g lazy to be honest
|
|
By:
"Watered AFTER racing Saturday"
|
|
By:
Good, now
|
|
By:
Probably nearer to Good to Soft but they will have gone for Good to save face.
|
|
By:
How much WATER has he put on?
It is a LOOSE as could be on top. |
|
By:
how none of them got past secret art in that last i'll never know, ground must be testing by now ...
|
|
By:
disgrace this-put 4m on last night and then the rain on top,done one today thinking the ground was good-firm.
|
|
By:
IT IS good to firm,times dont lie.
|
|
By:
havent seen the times frank,just a couple of races...hope you right
|
|
By:
k i w
Wigwam back in form there  |
|
By:
goldon hiway... sure he pulled that one friday
 |
|
By:
jockeys said the ground was on the soft side of good yesterday...i wonder what tonight brings.
|
|
By:
Nothing worse than inaccurate going reports, and deliberately prepared track biases like we see at Royal Ascot every single year, absolutely scandalous, but no doubt done to assist their bookie paymasters.
|