Luke Morris.....

photo merchants not getting involved, they know ...

luke morris is an average jockey at best much better on the aw than turf but will never get a top job because he is not good enough end of

Conkian - Leaving aside any difficulty in defending that he is "average", what evidence do you have that he is "much better" on the aw than turf?

12% winners on AW, 10% on turf?

WINS    RUNS    %    2NDS    3RDS    4THS    WIN PRIZE    TOTAL PRIZE    £1 STAKE
2YO    104    1090    10    137    117    141    £322,554.05    £614,261.30    -384.34
3YO    282    2130    13    305    283    270    £1,156,436.56    £1,771,982.64    -634.86
4YO+    336    3167    11    370    390    371    £1,412,511.14    £2,385,846.80    -741.82
AW    504    4133    12    550    532    525    £1,655,741.24    £2,537,254.20    -989.19
TURF    218    2254    10    262    258    257    £1,235,760.51    £2,234,836.54    -771.83

ffs................hes worse than me................

Very similar stats tbh. I'd have thought he AW record would be far superior to the turf.

2015, 14% AW, 8% turf

Morris should go to US and make some decent money on the lesser tracks, he is capable jockey so why not

Where's Conkian.  Still, my case rests The "problem" with stats for this lad is that he will ride anything, for anyone, nearly anywhere which is not condusive to achieving a high strike rate. As posted previously and regularly I rate him very highly.