In the last 25 years, 3 favourites have started from draw 1. 1 of them has won, at 2/1. LSP = zero.
In the last 10 years, 6 of the horses that have been drawn 1 have gone off at 25/1 or more. 5 of them at 40/1 or more.
In the last 25 years, 3 favourites have started from draw 1. 1 of them has won, at 2/1. LSP = zero.In the last 10 years, 6 of the horses that have been drawn 1 have gone off at 25/1 or more. 5 of them at 40/1 or more.
And if you restrict it to field sizes of 12 runners or less, then favourites starting from draw 1 have a 50% strike rate in the last 25 years, showing a LSP of 50%. Gold mine!
And if you restrict it to field sizes of 12 runners or less, then favourites starting from draw 1 have a 50% strike rate in the last 25 years, showing a LSP of 50%. Gold mine!
The 1 stall can prove tricky in the Classics at Epsom. Only 11 runners will be a help & Ryan Moore even more so. Bit of a concern to me this morn is the rainfall now gd/gs in pls Was sweet on Lega's chances 2day, but wanted gd/fast ground for her. Will hold fire on my Oaks bet until the real ground condition in known.
The 1 stall can prove tricky in the Classics at Epsom.Only 11 runners will be a help & Ryan Moore even more so.Bit of a concern to me this morn is the rainfall now gd/gs in pls Was sweet on Lega's chances 2day, but wanted gd/fast ground for her.Will
stalls 1 and 2 have a horrendous win record historically with field sizes 8 or more, anyone backing legatissimo today needs their head tested. She may well prove to be by far the best filly today and overcome it but in the long run you will lose badly
stalls 1 and 2 have a horrendous win record historically with field sizes 8 or more, anyone backing legatissimo today needs their head tested. She may well prove to be by far the best filly today and overcome it but in the long run you will lose badl
Basing your gambling on circumstantial statistics will lead to losing badly. In England, on Group One tracks, 9/10 over trips in excess of a mile the best horse on the day will win no matter where they are drawn. If the jolly loses it won't be because of what stall it came out of 12 furlongs ago
Basing your gambling on circumstantial statistics will lead to losing badly. In England, on Group One tracks, 9/10 over trips in excess of a mile the best horse on the day will win no matter where they are drawn. If the jolly loses it won't be becaus
That stat is so ridiculous it's painful. It's a field size of 11, she's the best filly in there for me and should be closer to the 2/1 mark, definitely a value bet.
That stat is so ridiculous it's painful. It's a field size of 11, she's the best filly in there for me and should be closer to the 2/1 mark, definitely a value bet.
There is no doubt that those drawn in the lowest two stalls would have used up more gas to get from a standing start to the top of the hill than those drawn in the middle and higher, whether they are then good enough to still win depends on how much better than the opposition they are.
There is no doubt that those drawn in the lowest two stalls would have used up more gas to get from a standing start to the top of the hill than those drawn in the middle and higher, whether they are then good enough to still win depends on how much
Draw 2, the complete rag, just touches off Draw 1, who'd got herself in a state on the way to the start and had to barge her way through - with a gap back to the rest.
Draw 2, the complete rag, just touches off Draw 1, who'd got herself in a state on the way to the start and had to barge her way through - with a gap back to the rest.