There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 302 comments are related to the topic:
INTEGRAL cost me £1m
INTEGRAL cost me £1m
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 302
|
By:
The screenshots do look real to me, it does seem obvious he didn't lay anything off though so I don't get all of the messing about with that bit.
Regarding them laying the bet, surely they would love taking accas like this all day long. They don't want to take fortunes (some pennies) on singles, but 5000/1 accas with the true price being a lot higher I cannot see why they wouldn't. Also seeing as the betslip number is over 3200 you can only assume the op has done his conkers over the months/years - and I wouldn't be surprised if he is VIP with them. But certainly not a propunter from what I have seen. Either all of that or he's got a massive haul here and I am one of them! PS - Not sure why Sir_Bond even has the audacity to comment after all of his editing bets over the years have been exposed on here. |
|
By:
2xpensive 17 May 15 13:18
http://postimg.org/image/gw38kntel/ Where's the four folds screenshot and the five timer accumulator ? |
|
By:
Facts, how are you enjoying this magnificent Conservative government?
|
|
By:
Words fail me Johnny
 |
|
By:
marko69 17 May 15 13:39
Why on earth would someone that is apparently a VIP be posting on a forum that is almost extinct?  |
|
By:
facts
the link showing the 4 folds as you seem to have missed it http://postimg.org/image/tdsal5tfv/ |
|
By:
best put down was 1 minute after op posted
Biscar Two from a mile back 16 May 15 16:00 I had £201 on them |
|
By:
facts - and the fivefold you also missed was the first link:
http://postimg.org/image/apyc6tmdp |
|
By:
Not arsed enough to read all of this
But did the guy put the bet down is it this just waffle |
|
By:
Next someone will pop up on here claiming their brother was a former rugby international who could run 100 metres in 9.24 seconds whilst simultaneously being gently fellated by a current Miss World.
|
|
By:
not sure thats why its dragging on.
|
|
By:
Unlicky, but ask yourself this, even if you won a million, no doubt the way you back within 2 months you'd have handed it all back. That's why they let you bet in such large amounts.
|
|
By:
swift-tuttle 18 May 15 10:57
facts the link showing the 4 folds as you seem to have missed it http://postimg.org/image/tdsal5tfv/ Magic__Daps 18 May 15 11 facts - and the fivefold you also missed was the first link: http://postimg.org/image/apyc6tmdp So....the alleged bets were a :- Canadian ( 26 bets @ £3 ). = Total stake £78 Lucky 31. ( 31 bets @ £3 ). =. Total stake £93 Four folds ? It states a Total stake of £250, this would mean the necessary 6 bets would have to be staked at £41.66 each ) !!!! And Five fold accumulator? He originally posted stake was £200. Then posted a 'screen shot ' showing £220 In other words a total fantasy. |
|
By:
Oops !! Sorry - my mistake ! Of course there are 5 four folds in a Canadian.
So that would have been 5 x £50 then ? |
|
By:
much has been made of the 200/220 thing -but does it not occur to anyone else that this can be understood as just a bit of shorthand from the writer? Posting on the forum does not require a legalistic degree of accuracy while remaining 'truthful'. If I had won or lost a shedload of money and I was minded to come on the forum to blow off some steam about it, I could very well bang out an opening post that said '£200' (or £200,000) when the actual number was '220'.
|
|
By:
Jeez, get ya facts rights Facts.
|
|
By:
Hmmm. But what I don't understand is why someone would have a bet over 5 horses that includes a £3 Lucky 31 and a £3 Canadian. Both including Fourfolds and an accumulator for a £3 bet. And then apparantly have a separate bet on Fourfolds for a £50 stake on each perm. And a £200/£220 bet as an accumulator.
So extremes go from 5 x £3win singles - to £50 win Fourfolds - and then a £200 accumulator. Really ? |
|
By:
denathorn 19 May 15 10:07
Jeez, get ya facts rights Facts. Yep, schoolboy error, but at least I realised it very quickly |
|
By:
£200 accum only comes to £327k @sp
|
|
By:
Everyone who is saying it's done in acrobat or easy to do - why don't they do one with a different stake and prove that it's some dodgey put together fantasy bet. I will then say that it's fake, but to me it looks real - whether or not it is or isn't.
|
|
By:
wasnt sp he took early prices
 |
|
By:
Magic_Daps
Already been proved on another thread by Andrew Andrew in Sweden 18 May 15 18:23 http://postimg.org/image/rw61h2vel/ Easy to create |
|
By:
well as andrew has shown its an easy fake if you know how...also not posting the lays rubber stamps its all fraud.
|
|
By:
'Front up and lay on the banter - you can convince anyone of anything' is the depressingly sincere credo of many a person.
|
|
By:
.. and he's all front - theres absolutely nothing else going on whatsoever.
|
|
By:
what were the ep?
|
|
By:
http://postimg.org/image/apyc6tmdp/
|
|
By:
so what does screenshot prove?
|
|
By:
as andrew in sweden has shown..absolutely folk hall.
|
|
By:
if you remember roida, the op was asking about in running, really basic questions, also about pc and didn't seem to be clued up
on another thread he talks about laying a long odds on shot for a 100 in the in mkt and 9 quid in the place, so if that's true he's small fry could be another from the horseburger stable at a guess, long ago joining date but little used account until recently says it's a regular |
|
By:
*win
|
|
By:
Andrew got some juicy prices there.....
It was obvious from Roidas first question about the lays that there was never one of those placed tbf. |
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
|
|
By:
The guy makes out he is a large stakes player
£220 is a extremely odd stake , 200 , 250 maybe but its a little like sticking on £507 if you know what i mean , and original post was £200 I think the £220 was a typo He also said he put 1000 on the 50/1 tip posted up here last week and took 24hrs to post his trebles etc , also no post of the massive lay on integral And no way hills taking on that liability on a sat with ryan moore when at least three of them were strong fancies I dont know how to do that kind of editing , but andrew showed its easy |
|
By:
okay I've changed my stance on this - the evidence is starting to mount that it is pretence
but the points of interest still remain - if people think that Hill's wouldn't have accepted the 5 fold because of the stake - that doesn't make a lot of sense to me plenty of accas at smaller stakes are accepted that have a potential 1 million liability for the bookie |
|
By:
£220 was so he could say it was a million payout @t early prices
 |
|
By:
moore had a strong book on saturday , Telescope was a frankel like certainty and integral was very strongly fancied
I really doubt hills would take that liability on to that many lines for a mill , may be wrong but i doubt it |
|
By:
lol idiots
|
|
By:
2xpensive - well done on a truly spectacular haul! You have however exceeded the EU fishing quotas, be a good boy and throw a few back in the water...
p.s. Hard lines on your £2 acc, they'll be another day I'm sure. |
|
By:
lol
|