There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 142 comments are related to the topic:
Chucked out?
Chucked out?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 142
|
By:
seen a lot worse not turned over so there is no way this will be
|
|
By:
It's lost on the nod, Tally, and was in front on the next bob. Either way, not relevant at all, it's not the stewards job to decide whether the winner was idling or not.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
the winner didnt touch the RU. they had a good set-to to the line, and the winner also responed when looking beat. No way can they throw that out. Horse jinked due to something other than the whip too for good measure.
|
|
By:
it probably will keep it.....
|
|
By:
apprentice jock vs Kirby.
When asked of his chances in the stewards, Crouch said "maybe" Hector, how about: Yeah he cut me up really badly, Matt. Totally spooked my horse and checked his momentum. Deffo cost him the race.  |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Fred seen going in Stewards Room demanding that it is thrown out after a quick to Warrington to check the Company payout figures.....
|
|
By:
but you cant say definately the second would have won imo SC
|
|
By:
don't swerve wins pretty comfortably,
but it did and the runner up only got done a head.Hard one. Pretty sure though in America and maybe France would be thrown out. |
|
By:
quick call
|
|
By:
lost on the nod
 |
|
By:
Out to 1.50 now.
|
|
By:
short head not a head. shd used to go any interference
|
|
By:
you can never say that though can you really......
|
|
By:
gaelic silver, baldy not had a bean for it, will get the reverse
|
|
By:
it'd be a massively inconsistent call if they turned it over
|
|
By:
looks like the bald knocker is going to get his first return on his investment....
|
|
By:
Weighed in, weighed in
|
|
By:
GTFI
|
|
By:
thank fook for that
 |
|
By:
JOKE
|
|
By:
Poor decision, but the expected one.
|
|
By:
I luv this course 1 race and i win twice
|
|
By:
Never in doubt ffs!
|
|
By:
"was there interference YES did the runner up lose more ground than it was beaten YES"
as I understand the rules these are the only two questions the stewards have to consider. The fact that the best horse won is irrelevant. Maybe they use common sense rather than the rules and let the winner keep it. |
|
By:
not a joke. the horse jinked for becauseit saw the entrance to the paddock. Once thats established it keeps the race. Simple call
|
|
By:
poor decision
|
|
By:
There are,ipso facto,no interference rules then.
|
|
By:
Some of you dont know the rules. If the horse jinked purely because of the jockey, he gets thrown out. suck it up.
|
|
By:
Is that in the rules then, ArmchairIdiot, that it you can explain why the interference occurs then it doesn't count? You're either a troll or well named.
|
|
By:
sefinately well named
|
|
By:
stop crying. you should know the rules.
|
|
By:
Some of you dont know the rules. If the horse jinked purely because of the jockey, he gets thrown out. suck it up.
 |
|
By:
The 2nd went by, and still lost, (the winner came back and beat it) so the interference didn't cost it the race.
|
|
By:
I bet on the winner but it should have been thrown out.
|
|
By:
there's that reason as well, redmel.
|
|
By:
It is a joke armchair.
The rules clearly state that it is irrelevant, as far as disqualifications are concerned, whether the interference was accidental or not. |
|
By:
Shocking (quick) decision, he had to snatch the runner up yet only got beat a short head and was gaining at the line .
|
|
By:
The Cecil horse at Ascot tha time... Solar something? Horse got taken out and still didnt get the decision becasue the horse that took it out got spooked.
|