There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 142
|
By:
Think it'll be unlucky green as grass and just jinked at the people on the rail I think
|
|
By:
About an obvious chuck as you can get.
|
|
By:
If that isn't disqualified then we may as well not have interference rules.
|
|
By:
No chance of being slung
|
|
By:
50/50
|
|
By:
dont think it made the runner up lose any ground and was staying on again at the end.
|
|
By:
did it effect the result? Not for me. cost the winner more ground than the runner up
|
|
By:
Got to go shirley
|
|
By:
It got headed and got back up no way was the 2nd interfered with enough to get it
|
|
By:
Should be thrown out
Won't be thrown out |
|
By:
Had a fair bit left in the locker at the line. Should definitely keep it.
|
|
By:
No way in a month of sundays that will get chucked
|
|
By:
Not made a difference? It nearly brought it down and stopped its momentum, and it was closing strongly at the line.
|
|
By:
it will keep it
|
|
By:
1.3 buying money
|
|
By:
Relative experience and seniority of jockeys is going to dictate this one.
|
|
By:
wudda won by 3 lengths had it kept straight
|
|
By:
Was going to go lengths clear before jinking and was staying on again at the end. Kirby also said he had loads of horse left. Keeps the race imo.
|
|
By:
looked far worse than it was, no chance of a change
SC looking through betting goggles |
|
By:
Cecil not exaggerating one bit
 |
|
By:
Was well clear before it jinked imo.
|
|
By:
The rules clearly state that the Stewards MAY NOT take into account any ground lost by the runner that caused the interference.
|
|
By:
should go but Kirby will talk his way out of it
|
|
By:
Not the point, Greg, and not how the rules work thankfully.
|
|
By:
Have all the 'it'll keep its' backed it at 1/3 currently - sure the biggest easy money your likely to get for you if your so sure!!
|
|
By:
a few yards past the line the runner up was in front...should be chucked but if the jockeys matter in the stewards then it.ll keep it
|
|
By:
was there interference YES did the runner up lose more ground than it was beaten YES , HAS TO GO.
|
|
By:
They will have to change to rules, 1.36 giving it away
|
|
By:
They will have to start chucking them in soon at that "racecourse"....
Even the FOBTS will be switched off.... |
|
By:
I've not bet on it, just a no brainer isn't it?
|
|
By:
"wudda won by 3 lengths had it kept straight "
But it didn't. Will keep the race on British rules........unfortunately:-) |
|
By:
i dont agree with kirby i loads in tank
hardly........... |
|
By:
Closing strongly at the line???
 Could have gone around the track another six times and still wouldn't have got by |
|
By:
only won by a head........
|
|
By:
Why is nobody lumping on the winner at 2/5 now!!???
|
|
By:
Stewards to call in phorum member Rewired to disprove the jockey Adam Kirby that the horse, contrary to the jockey's apparently misguided belief, did not have lots left
 |
|
By:
its obviously a better horse
but he caused the interference and got home by a head......... |
|
By:
thank you magnus magnusson
|
|
By:
the joist needs fixing.....
|