...init?!
|
By:
I agree it's a horrible sentence but I believe it is correct. Grabbing the crown which belongs to Toronado I.e. "of Toronado"
|
|
By:
Cheers Mr.Glass...probably right but it still reads all wrong to me, but as you can see i am a tad bored waiting for Maid in Rio race and see if she gets home
![]() |
|
By:
youtu.be/qCxXnD2bVaw
![]() |
|
By:
it is getting to the point where i am watching you tube vid about kids with torrets!....yes very wrong but damn funny
|
|
By:
Um yar man when it comes two grammer only avtwo ask.
![]() |
|
By:
Surely -
'Kingman out to grab Toronado's Sussex crown' Would have been much simpler - far less conflictory, and use less space. |
|
By:
Yes -- there is a tautology -- if Toronado holds the crown, he must have won last year -- so there is no point saying both -- @onlooker's headline is far better.
|
|
By:
£2.10 a day
![]() |
|
By:
I went to private school, had a superb(very expensive)education, have an Honours Degree in English and can cofirm todays' RP front page headline is grammatically correct! Well worth the 2 English pounds and 10 pence.
|
|
By:
knowitaint
|
|
By:
it may well be correct but it reads like a gimp wrote it guv'n'r
|
|
By:
Cofirmed gbtp.
|
|
By:
It may be grammatically ok but it is not factually correct. Eadwine was the last king of Sussex.
|
|
By:
^ ^ ^
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
gawd
![]() |
|
By:
It may be grammatically ok but it is not factually correct. Eadwine was the last king of Sussex.
Very good ![]() |
|
By:
jackdaw.......excellent!
|
|
By:
should it not be years' (or just years) instead of year's
|
|
By:
Chonaic, you are indeed correct. At the risk of being pedantic, however, that is a punctuation error, rather than a grammatical one. It is a very widespread error, which I see frequently, even in the Daily Mail, and also the Telegraph,both of which I take.
|
|
By:
I have never known anyone to take both the Telegraph and the Mail. MUst be a right wing zealot
|
|
By:
parispike, how perceptive you are!
|
|
By:
Gbtp
Shouldn't that be "How perceptive of you, parispike" ? |
|
By:
Both are correct I believe, Amphora.
|
|
By:
No, it's not a question!
![]() |
|
By:
Quite correct Bernard Mafiaews. It's not a question in the original comment. But my post was a question, hence the "?".
Bootiful. |
|
By:
Both incorrect I'm afraid! The question mark was not inside the inverted commas, therefore you are both wrong, sorry lads.
|
|
By:
Fair point
|
|
By:
gbtp • July 30, 2014 6:38 PM BST
Both incorrect I'm afraid! The question mark was not inside the inverted commas, therefore you are both wrong, sorry lads. ^^^^^ I like him already! ^^^^^ ![]() |
|
By:
Eye went too the same school as gbtp
|
|
By:
In your dreams Dickie-Bird!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
A wonderful school, no doubt.
Probably approved. |
|
By:
Raspberry! I really expect better from a fellow public school boy! Although I must admit my matron was nowhere near as "good" as yours' obviously is!
|
|
By:
At the risk of being pedantic, however, that is a punctuation error, rather than a grammatical one. It is a very widespread error, which I see frequently, even in the Daily Mail, and also the Telegraph,both of which I take.
Poor grammar and punctuation ![]() |
|
By:
In your dreams Dickie-Bird!!!!!!!!!!!!!
eye was the matron ![]() |
|
By:
the apostrophe is correct ... the headline is gross
|
|
By:
RP full of *uckwits, regular spelling and grammatical mistakes in the rag and also on the website.
|
|
By:
It's a bit of an abbreviated sentence isn't it? commonly deployed for Rag-Headlines? Lacks a 'the' before Sussex crown. Still far prefer it to the Forest Chump one so ridiculously defended by Peter Thomas in his rancid post column.
|
|
By:
headline seems to have been written by a non english speaker
|
|
By:
headline seems to have been written by a non english speaker
The Eastern European invasion have now infiltrated the Rancid Post |