Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Wesdag
27 May 14 17:36
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Aug 09
| Topic/replies: 21,689 | Blogger: Wesdag's blog
Should probably keep it due to the winning distance.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 42
By:
penzance
When: 27 May 14 17:37
that would have been very close without
the interferance.
By:
Wesdag
When: 27 May 14 17:37
agreed
By:
doantwin2easy
When: 27 May 14 17:37
clever bit of race riding that. Ocean knew what he was doing imo.
By:
Deltâ
When: 27 May 14 17:37
terrible jockeyship from Ocean


4 day ban to follow
By:
NMR
When: 27 May 14 17:38
I'd back no change - across the Irish sea or Atlantic I'd be saying different.
By:
hulk23
When: 27 May 14 17:38
don't really get the distance thing.  the distance is what it is because he's almost brought the runner-up to a complete standstill
By:
onlooker
When: 27 May 14 17:38
1.01 to be be disqualified in AUSTRALIA and AMERICA - But ...

- We are in 'good old blighty'.
By:
placepotkid
When: 27 May 14 17:38
1.25  free money
By:
howard
When: 27 May 14 17:38
It would but actual distance too far. Should be free money ffp
By:
howard
When: 27 May 14 17:39
fpp
By:
penzance
When: 27 May 14 17:39
layed the winner @1.25,might get chucked.
Not much damaged done if it don't.
By:
placepotkid
When: 27 May 14 17:40
Laugh
By:
conkian
When: 27 May 14 17:40
onlooker is correct should be dq'd here as well imo but won't
By:
rewired
When: 27 May 14 17:41
our rules are you can hamper another horse as much as you want
as long as you win by a length and over
jockey get hands slapped
but if money down
do they really care
By:
San Quentin
When: 27 May 14 17:41
dont understand how this could not be thrown out.The rules need looking at if not.But we all know that.
By:
jollie
When: 27 May 14 17:43
the rules are ok

the stewards are all over the place
By:
NMR
When: 27 May 14 17:44
Kept it
By:
rewired
When: 27 May 14 17:44
never in doubt
By:
Bonza Bud
When: 27 May 14 17:45
Its plain wrong!
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 17:46
Its laughable our enquirys, how can he keep the race after that??. It gets worse it really does. a 2 day ban no doubt.
By:
conkian
When: 27 May 14 17:46
stewards have no fuccking backbone at all british racing laughing stock cut the 2nd up still keep the race just get a little break for your trouble
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 17:47
I backed the winner to place and think it should be thrown out altogether. pathetic british racing, no backbone and no respect for the punter.
By:
NMR
When: 27 May 14 17:47
I saw a horse get chucked for a place at Emerald Downs for less than that last night!!
By:
Bonza Bud
When: 27 May 14 17:47
I think they are too scared to change a winner
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 17:48
The bookies run our racing Bonza. joke.
By:
Bonza Bud
When: 27 May 14 17:48
Would you get the same result with every steward?
By:
K Whizzburgstar
When: 27 May 14 17:49
Oscin even looked round before deciding to give another smack to make sure interference was enough to stop the second going past
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 17:49
Its ok to ram another horse, its ok to whip another horse in the eyes, its ok to almost throw another jockey off the other horse, as long as its a length its all fair.
By:
Bonza Bud
When: 27 May 14 17:50
Maybe giving a dead heat in those circumsizes is a better idea
By:
Cider
When: 27 May 14 17:50
Why are you lot blubbing about the stoods? Correct application of the current rules/laws
By:
howard
When: 27 May 14 17:50
The best horse usually wins though. The second was finishing but not like a train. They couldn't be sure it would have won.
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 17:52
Cider and Howard were the stewards dealing with it
By:
rewired
When: 27 May 14 17:52
only thing with this rule is a jockey can hamper another badly and keep race
as long as distance is a length
By:
Bonza Bud
When: 27 May 14 17:53
It was three quarters of a length though?
By:
The Knight
When: 27 May 14 17:59
But what nobody ever says about the way these rules are now applied is when a horse wins on merit BUT causes trouble behind which costs another horse a place.

Under the old rules a horse in the latter situation would be placed BEHIND the one it cost a place, even if it had won.

Today, though, that does not seem to be possible because of the over-liberal rules.
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 18:03
If the bookies scrapped the FPTP rule how many races would get overturned in that situation??
By:
HorseBurger1989
When: 27 May 14 18:06
Betfair don't pay FPTP and rightly so. if the FPTP gets chucked because of interference then its tough and that's the way it should be. annoying when it happens but it would make it much fairer imo.
By:
Deltâ
When: 27 May 14 18:07
The Stewards found Murphy in breach of Rule (B)54.2 and guilty of improper riding in that he had allowed his horse to drift left causing interference. They suspended him for 3 days as follows: Tuesday 10, Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 June 2014.
By:
onlooker
When: 27 May 14 18:08
But that was too draconian - The Knight - and almost unworkable, in reflection - most especially from a punting point of view, and would be even more so, with 'in-running' betting nowadays.

You must remember the absolute MESS of the FIRST THREE home ALL being 'thrown out' at Royal Ascot, in the Queen Anne.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com