Correct!

2-50 Sedge.

just watched this for first time (and rewound a few times just to be sure I'd seen with my own eyes!) and have to say it looked very poor and the least i would have expected was for stewards to refer the ride, unless they have some cameras on the inside which showed what exactly happened with his left leg leaving the stirrups but certainly from the normal camera angle it looked as if he jumped off.

and for all those who come on and say 'what do you know you've never ridden' or 'no way a jockey would intentionally fall or jump off', history shows that they do!  jeez, dermot browne lost a champion hurdle (sure the horse would have won) on his own horse, if that can happen then anything is possible

When stewards say, they "noted his explanation" rather than "accepted his explanation" thats pc talk for "We don't believe you!"
Needless to say the security dept will be looking for any unusual betting patterns and who was laying.

You don't need to see it from another angle. He clearly meant it, and the reason given doesn't allign itself with the evidence. The horse didn't step to the side at all, and if it did he wouldn't have had the time to hop off.(seconds after he took a look behind). It also brings into question others in the race, as someone else(another jockey) could likely have been involved.

sedge 2.50 yesterday

Any jobs going as stewards???

Bloody hell the look round said it all . . . .No ive never ridden horse never want too but ive got a pair of things either side of my snout.

yeah hes fine,currently booking a holiday somewhere hot