|
By:
The trouble is these programmes don't cater to the people that watch.
Typical example is right now on RUK. 10 minutes before the first at Carlisle we are treated to a discussion between the two presenters about Cheltenham,while in the background we can see that the horses are in the parade ring. Don't know about anyone else but wouldn't it be more to the point to show us the horses,even if the presenters keep talking about something else, rather than looking at their ugly mugs! And,following that, we get a talk with a bookie and an item on odds for a race in next year's Cheltenham!!! Unffngbelievable! |
|
By:
Really...the morning line is something you can do with just 1 person.
Its not anything overly special and shouldn't be. Just hire Matt Chapman and job done. |
|
By:
The show is too technical and serious and gord knows what that elaborate machine is for - apart from confusion?
I'd keep Nick Luck and Jim McGrath - I think they do a good job but it does lack a bit of banter without McCririck and Francombe - Its the show itself that needs revamping maybe more so than the presenters but I don't watch it as much these days - so that says it all to me! |
|
By:
keep the pig for gawd sake
he is a better judge than me ![]() |
|
By:
gleesen for tanya is a start....
|
|
By:
Cannot bear to watch that rancid crew..
Tanya should be replaced by some-one in the know that is not allegedly having sexual relations ( ) with a high flyer..The angry Northerner should be given the red card.. Alice Plunkett should take what appears to look like an upper class d il do and put it where the sun does not shine.. Rancid bunch of graveytrainers and if "Come Dine With Me" is delayed again I may complain to the regulator... By the way who mentioned Matt Chapman.. How can he be allowed on TV when he promotes "Paddy Power - never knowingly above bottom price".... |
|
By:
How much money would they be on a week , roughly ? fitz n tanya
|
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHAXnGxC8Jo
MONEY FOR OLD ROPE . |