Not able to help with stats but do know that Pricewise selections have different point values depending on how much confidence he has in each selection,
If you look at your own stats and identify those selections that had more confidence in them and increase the points staked and downgrade those that you had little or no confidence in at the time I am sure you could improve your ROI
HiNot able to help with stats but do know that Pricewise selections have different point values depending on how much confidence he has in each selection,If you look at your own stats and identify those selections that had more confidence in them and
I have already done that in truth Czech. Are you suggesting that it is quite feasible for Pricewise to have an ROI of 216%? I was under the impression that 37% was extremely reasonable...
I have already done that in truth Czech. Are you suggesting that it is quite feasible for Pricewise to have an ROI of 216%? I was under the impression that 37% was extremely reasonable...
Don't know about Pricewise, but Tom Segal as Pricewise Extra has a ROI of 19%.
I have stats on numerous tipsters, past and present, and nobody gets close to 37%, never mind 216%. Top is 25%.
Mind you, I don't use published prices. I use those that were available when I knew about the tip. Having said that if anyone claims returns of 216%, I would like to know where their tips are !!
Don't know about Pricewise, but Tom Segal as Pricewise Extra has a ROI of 19%.I have stats on numerous tipsters, past and present, and nobody gets close to 37%, never mind 216%. Top is 25%.Mind you, I don't use published prices. I use those that were
In fairness WFT, to get 37% I am advising prices that are readily available in the morning, and not taking SP, but I felt that was all part of the game, getting the value.
I claimed that 216% was the biggest pile of drivel too, that is essentially suggesting that given the average price of horses that he tips are probably about 7/1 (guess)... that 40% of his selections win... which I know, they don't!
In fairness WFT, to get 37% I am advising prices that are readily available in the morning, and not taking SP, but I felt that was all part of the game, getting the value.I claimed that 216% was the biggest pile of drivel too, that is essentially sug
Just using 2013's figures, his average early price is 11.64, and the sp is 9.82.
His strike rate was 10.49%
His best year was 2009, and the same figures are 9.82, 7.15, and 22.86%. His ROI that year was an exceptional 77.65%.
Just using 2013's figures, his average early price is 11.64, and the sp is 9.82.His strike rate was 10.49%His best year was 2009, and the same figures are 9.82, 7.15, and 22.86%. His ROI that year was an exceptional 77.65%.
You sure that makes sense WFT, or am I reading that wrong?
Average price of 9.82 and 7.15% strike rate? I'm guessing the strike rate was a typo and missing a 1 off the front?!
You sure that makes sense WFT, or am I reading that wrong?Average price of 9.82 and 7.15% strike rate? I'm guessing the strike rate was a typo and missing a 1 off the front?!
Average price of 9.82 and 7.15% strike rate? I'm guessing the strike rate was a typo and missing a 1 off the front?!
Yes, Ivor is correct.
Early price : 9.82 SP : 7.15 Strike Rate : 22.86%
Interesting that he seemed to do better when the prices were lower.
Average price of 9.82 and 7.15% strike rate? I'm guessing the strike rate was a typo and missing a 1 off the front?! Yes, Ivor is correct.Early price : 9.82SP : 7.15Strike Rate : 22.86%Interesting that he seemed to do better when the prices were lowe
You are right, that is interesting, and who says there is no value in shorter priced selections...
Apologies, what an absolute numpty!!!Many thanks for that WFT.You are right, that is interesting, and who says there is no value in shorter priced selections...