Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 99 comments are related to the topic:
AGT Auction

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 99
By:
ribero1
When: 13 Jan 14 12:43
Regit,Wetherby was hopeless,31 books in tatts,last year was bad but like you I thought the weather may improve things a little,so you could say this meeting has peaked!
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 13:27
regit, if you bid 17k the vendor can take it even if it hasn't reached reserve.  Your bid is binding.
By:
Davy Jones
When: 13 Jan 14 13:51
Wasnto - what was wrong with your chelt tatts pick 46, paddy power saturday looked ok last year , wouldnt champion hurdle day and gold cup day be decent?
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 15:56
Davy - we bet in tatts for over 20 years.  In the end it when it came to my pick there wasn't any pitch I wanted to bet in so that was the time to turn it in.  The last gold cup day we bet there we stood in the middle of the 2nd line and fielded £250 on the foxhunters :O
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 16:59
And a mediocre pitch in the Best Mate by comparison takes what wassy ?
By:
Davy Jones
When: 13 Jan 14 17:14
Surely you would be fielding a few grand on the big races from that pitch, i know the hcaps and foxhunters can be a bit tricky.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 17:19
ITS OFFICIAL,CHELTENHAM TATTS AINT WORTH TWO BOB,FRIEND OF MINE BET ON THE FRONT LINE GOLD CUP DAY AND HELD 9K,IF I COULDNT HOLD THAT ON ANY SATURDAY AT HEXHAM ID RAP UP,JUST YORK TATTS (OR THE EMPERORS NEW CLOTHES)TO BE FOUND OUT NOWHappy
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 18:13
Was taking less than 5 grand all day Davy.  Also at very small margins.  With the ex's just not worth it.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 18:23
WASNOT,I SUSPECT THE SAME AT YORK,ALTHOUGH NO DOUBT ALL WILL BE REVEALED ONCE U HAVE SOLDLaugh
By:
unbiased
When: 13 Jan 14 18:49
Is it possible to say how much % approx. the value of pitches has dropped over the last 10 years,rails and ring.
  During the last 10 years both online,and exchange betting have really come to the fore,not to mention other things,so was wondering how much this has impacted on the value of pitches.
I understand that some key picks may have actually increased,but what is the overall picture,bearing in mind that there are only so many top picks?
Answers appreciated,thanks in advance.
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 19:56
If ever there was an argument for a graduated badge fee to be introduced with immediate effect then Cheltenham Tatts is it.......
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 19:57
If ever there was an argument for a graduated badge fee to be introduced with immediate effect then Cheltenham Tatts is it.......
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 19:57
If ever there was an argument for a graduated badge fee to be introduced with immediate effect then Cheltenham Tatts is it.......
By:
ribero1
When: 13 Jan 14 20:14
Really?
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 20:17
lol yes
By:
545APG
When: 13 Jan 14 20:19
Graduated badge fee my ar$e
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 20:26
Crumbs there's a badge fee for 'everything' !!! Whoops
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 20:27
RR,YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME,ILLUMINATI WANTED PEOPLE LIVING IN A 50K TERRACE HOUSE TO PAY THE SAME AS SOMEONE LIVING A 2 MILLION POUND MANSION UNTIL THE POLL TAX RIOTS,NOW WE HAVE THE BAND SYSTEM(GRADUATED BADGE FEE),I SUPPOSE WE COULD RISE UP AND HAVE THE CHELTENHAM RIOTS,BUT IT DOESNT HAVE THE SAME RINGLaugh
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 20:28
I'm sure the negotiators will be in favour - the worse pick you've got the more you pay !!!
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 20:29
LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh SPOT ON!
By:
545APG
When: 13 Jan 14 20:34
The only books that want graduated badge fees are the ones who've put phuck all in and have the least to lose
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 20:35
THATS THE MAJORITY THEN!
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 20:37
AS OPPOSED TO THE ONES THAT AGREED TO A MARKETING FEE WHO WERE **** SCARED OF LOSING EVERYTHING!
By:
ronnie rails
When: 13 Jan 14 20:40
the truth hurts

remember saying this before, been racing for many years the bookmakers have always thought of one thing THEMSELVES always have always will.
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 20:44
Where did it all go wrong fact, the Illummanti were supposed to be the only people on track by now...... taking all the turnover going and throwing it all back on here for a bigger guaranteed profit............. instead record numbers of books are turning up going bigger than the machine offering a proper service to the small number of paying customers still attending the track associations have lost all but a small amount of credibility and individual negotiations by pitcholders with racecourses direct have now taken precedent....
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 20:45
545APG - that just is not true ! Answer the question 'do you think the system is fair ?'. The stock answer of 'you know the situation when you buy the pitch' just will not do. I know this issue has been debated many times on here but I repeat 'Is it fair ?'.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 20:50
WELL FOR A START THE MARKETING FEE AGREED TO BY ILLUMINATI WAS A STEP(OR SO THEY THOUGHT)TO GET RID OF THE SMALLER BOOKMAKER,WHEN IN ACTUAL FACT ITS DONE QUITE THE OPPOSITE,MORE BOOKS FEEL THEY ARE OBLIGED TO TURN UP AT MORE MEETS AFTER PAYING THIS TOTAL RIP OFF!
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 20:53
I sometimes get this strange feeling of deja vu.......
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 20:56
Wassy it's not really a 14 next to the Jan look closely it says 13
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 21:00
Fact can you confirm if there is any truth in the rumour that as a result of the Marketing Fee not reducing the number of books in attendance that they have have turned to the major petrol retailers to lobby for an extra 20p a litre on all types of fuel.....
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 21:01
WASNOT,YEP I GET THAT FEELING EVERYTIME OUR NEGOTIATORS REACH A DEAL WITH THE RACECOURSES!
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 21:02
RRLaughLaughLaughIM SURE THE ILLUMINATI WILL TRY SOMETHING MORE DRASTIC IN THE VERY NEAR FUTUREWink
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 13 Jan 14 21:03
Wink
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 21:06
DEMOCRAT,BEING FAIR DOESNT EVEN REGISTER WITH SOME OF THESE PEOPLE BEING MOST OF EM HAVE THE SKIN OF A DINOSAUR!
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 21:08
You are quite right to do so wassy - Happy New Year to you and yours by the way. In the absence of a response hitherto may I be allowed to try to answer my own question ( no need to call the chaps in white coats - yet !! ). The brief answer is 'No - it is not fair'. Cast your mind back to pre pitch sales and in particular before exchanges existed and perhaps you can maintain that the system worked perfectly well then but why doesn't it now ? More to the point in those 'golden days' the system could even have been considered to be fair or more accurately fairer. Terms and conditions have changed radically since then, of course, especially for the lower ( inferior ) picks. Turnover has reduced, one of the main contributory reasons being that superior picks no longer hedge with the back lines of the ring and badge fees amonst other costs have, thanks to the agreements put in place, increased making life for those with moderate picks even more challenging. The case for the defence is ?
By:
democrat
When: 13 Jan 14 21:13
Oops 'amongst other costs'.
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 21:15
Happy new year to you too Demo Happy
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 13 Jan 14 21:17
ALL ILUMINATI ARE INSTRUCTED NOT TO DEFEND THEIR BELIEFS/ACTIONS WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF A SOLICITORShocked
By:
bbc2
When: 13 Jan 14 21:33
some firms like wassy have plenty of money still to spend
By:
wasnot
When: 13 Jan 14 21:48
Too right bbc2 Wink
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com