There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
20 Dec 13
16:57
Joined:
Date Joined:
03 Sep 08
Winner gets chucked imho
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 28
|
By:
didn't see the head on, was it bumped, carried or both?
|
|
By:
Yep and nothing in it at the line
|
|
By:
Official distance - Nose
|
|
By:
No chance
|
|
By:
a big swing in the odds just then, someone knows
|
|
By:
In any other country would get thrown out not in this one
 |
|
By:
Surely that has cost the runner up more than a nose
|
|
By:
just seen it, should keep it
|
|
By:
Def contact how can you say that min distance in it
|
|
By:
You think? Really think that should go giving the winning distance
|
|
By:
jockey put whip into left hand by design, might cost him
|
|
By:
Crikey - about 3 millimetres between them - it must go surely.
|
|
By:
Not enough interference in imo & also not clear the 2nd would go past. If was a dh, then yes.
|
|
By:
was going straight to me, why change whip hand ?
that must be what the stewards are asking Kingscote |
|
By:
ResultStands
Weighed In |
|
By:
Stands, joke decision
|
|
By:
winner won on merit
|
|
By:
Agree how far do you have to get beat not to get the race in this country
|
|
By:
backed the winner at 1-2 after race best bet ever that was never going to be reversed jockey will get a day ban
|
|
By:
About the only thing I usually get right, UK stewards.
|
|
By:
Since when do they change a result on that criteria. A ban will be imposed and that is that.
|
|
By:
there was no interference
|
|
By:
There clearly was
|
|
By:
There was interference but not enough for the winner to get chucked. I'm sure the bha site will say as much later.
|
|
By:
why have stewards at all.they never do anything
|
|
By:
if there wasinterference then result should have been reversed
|
|
By:
There'll always be interference unless you get horses to run in lanes.
|
|
By:
The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference inside the final half furlong. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, TRINITYELITEDOTCOM (IRE), ridden by Richard Kingscote, had interfered with IPTISAM, placed second, ridden by Luke Morris and that the interference had not improved TRINITYELITEDOTCOM (IRE)’s placing. They ordered the placings to remain unaltered. The Stewards found Kingscote in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he allowed his horse to drift right-handed. They cautioned him as to his future conduct in races.
This sums up all that is a joke with racing in uk, Was there interference YES Did the jockey break the rules YES Did it win by min distance YES Shall we let the result stand then and let the jockey get off for breaking the rules and winning by doing so YES |