|
By:
just saw race,stewards must of had a good lunch
|
|
By:
have had, much have had a good lunch with drinks including liqueurs I would imagine
|
|
By:
If you reverse the prices my money says the places remain unaltered
British racing make it up as you go along and as suits |
|
By:
Put this race alongside the Goring Goring race,and you can see how ridiculous the reverse was!!!!.
|
|
By:
The winner was knocked right off final bend ,the jockey had to switch whip to keep it going off the track,(in fear the horse on its left came out again? but regardless of that, the horse behind had no right to go for that gap,for ffs if he had not of pulled it back he would have charged between two horse costing them the race? well maybe not,but the inconsistency in stewards ship starting to rear its head.
|
|
By:
there was no gap,yep
|
|
By:
Lingfield just became a no bet zone for me,they can pull track down for me while those stewards ruling the roost1
|
|
By:
Just heard no jokey Ban(says it all)
|
|
By:
Correct decision for me - gap was definitely closed. That was more than race riding . If BSAT had kept straight and left the gap it would have lost anyway so correct decision.
|
|
By:
think the stewards were too influenced by the runner-up being clearly the best horse in the race, and not enough influenced by the lack of interference. the gap did close, but who decided the gap belonged to crowley? don't think he was upsides the pair when short of room, thought he was behind them
|
|
By:
Interference must have been deemed accidental,metro.
The intereference doesn't have to be deliberate or through careless riding for a runner to be dq'd. |
|
By:
Still don't understand, why you have to leave a gap for a horse which is behind you?
Fellow jockeys commiserate with Atzeni, saying he rode a great race |
|
By:
I can't begin to think how many place positions should be amended given the precedent of this decision.
|
|
By:
that race just there the fav interfered with the 3rd twice
|
|
By:
Just seen the race for the first time.
That really was an horrendously bad decision. |
|
By:
How hard does everyome think the Jockey protested against the well backed trainers mount imo
|
|
By:
worst decision ive ever seen,,surely an ivestigation is warranted,,that is just blatant robbery
|
|
By:
I agree in a way.
But the betting was only 1.5 vs 2.5 (strangely) Seen dozens of bigger prices win Stewards over the years. |
|
By:
Completely agree boyce.
|