Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 87
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:20
the only loons are the ones that pay up
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:21
Shocked
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:22
This Forum has never failed to unearth an endless supply of "certifiables".
In Tammy we have struck gold.
On the bonus side,it has made me chuckle.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:22
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWiKEdGcIGk
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:22
V Licensing and the law

Part 4 of the Communications Act 2003 makes it an offence to install or use a television receiver to watch or record any television programmes as they're being shown on television without a valid TV Licence. The Act empowers the BBC to make and amend the terms and conditions of a licence. It allows the government to make regulations to exempt or reduce the licence fee for certain persons in certain circumstances. It also makes it an offence for anyone to have any television receiver in their possession or under their control who intends to install or use it in contravention of the main offence (above), or knows, or has reasonable grounds for believing, that another person intends to install or use a television receiver in contravention of the main offence.
The Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004 define what is a 'television set' and who is a 'television dealer'. The regulations also set out the various types of TV Licence, the criteria for obtaining them, the fees payable for them (including the frequency and amount of instalments) and the different concessions available, including concessions for people who are blind or severely sight impaired, people who are over 74 years of age, people who live in residential care and people who run hotels, guesthouses or campsites.
The Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1967 (as amended) has been repealed meaning that from 25 June 2013 onwards, TV dealers are no longer required to notify TV Licensing when they sell or rent out TV equipment.
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:23
Perhaps Tammys an octogenarian !
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:24
Tasmmy,
Feast your eyes on this; You need to be covered by a valid TV Licence if you watch or record TV as it's being broadcast. This includes the use of devices such as a computer, laptop, mobile phone or DVD/video recorder.

It costs £145.50 for colour and £49.00 for a black and white TV Licence
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:24
HD,
We are not talking about his IQ!
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:24
'people who live in residential care'   NAP  !
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:26
racingstar, think he's joshing but Laugh all the same .
By:
salmon spray
When: 11 Nov 13 21:28
Actually I live in flats for over 55s only. We pay £7.50 for a licence. I feel a bit guilty tbh but there's no way I'd pay £120 per month for TV.
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:28
Btw, 8os a bit high imo
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:28
right at the end of this clip is a typical example,she even admits how can i see you in court if i don't have your details.that's what i'm on about you don't have to tell them anything.
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 21:28
* 80
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:32
SS,
It is all about individual finances.
I would not pay £500,000 for a Yearling but to Shiek Mo it is a TV Licence equivalent.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:32
you could even if you so wished invite them into your house and the telly could have the aerial in the back of the telly but if it's not switched on they can't prove you are watching live telly.people just get scared when they come to the door and sign the form, therefor admitting everything.
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:35
Tammy,
TV Detector vans do just what it says on the tin.
If you are watching a TV from an unlicenced property they can detect it.
Amazingly,that is how they get convictions,you Rajpot.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:35
sorry for hijacking your thread halcyon days.

i've said my piece now and there's plenty of clips on youtube.
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:37
The Government's Care in the Community Act has much to answer for,imo.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:37
tv detector vans

By:
xmoneyx
When: 11 Nov 13 21:39
@least tambhoy will be able to meet BBC icons when he's I a cell
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:46
this is what you do when they come to your door.of course you can also rip the p1ss out of them if you know that your not breaking any laws.2mins 34 secs in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekvRb_VmeAY
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:50
So,in conclusion,the Forum knows nothing about Law and Tammy is Rumpole of the Bailey!.
There is a very good reason that nutters are locked away.
Get ready for the Liquid Cosh,Tammy!
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 21:54
i know my rights and i don't have to divulge any information to a glorified bbc salesperson.
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 21:56
Remember to state that as they say,"take the Prisoner down",Tammy!
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 22:03
shows how much you know.you can only get jailed if you don't pay the fine.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 22:09
send them an implied right of access letter and they can't come on your property and knock your door.
then you can take them to a civil courtLaugh
By:
racingstar
When: 11 Nov 13 22:10
Dear God!
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 22:12
Laugh
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 22:13
We seemed to have strayed off topic and on to Citizen Tambhoys hidden agenda !
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Nov 13 22:17
LaughLaughLaughLaugh

sorry but just like my stats thread i'm just trying to put some money in peoples pockets.

i will say no more on the subjectWhoops
By:
halcyon days
When: 11 Nov 13 22:18
No probs mate... enjoyed the banter !
By:
Arfur Ffoulkes-Aycke
When: 11 Nov 13 23:42
What idiot cited TV Detector Vans? Oh, sorry racingCrazy
By:
racingstar
When: 12 Nov 13 00:01
I was waiting for an idiot to step forward.
Come on down Arfwit.
By:
ebulGery
When: 12 Nov 13 00:41
anybody who has ignored their viewers as much as CH 4 racing appears to have done

deserves to fail imo
By:
judorick
When: 12 Nov 13 00:45
I wrote to them giving an impartial review of performance and suggested they do some market research to see whether what I said held water

They wrote back saying they had done the work and were very happy with how things are going

Another set of the Emperor's New Clothes
By:
sageform
When: 12 Nov 13 08:04
I would be very happy to do without any terrestrial channels if I could avoid the license fee. I only watch C4 racing if I am away from home. I pay 3 license fees as I have 2 holiday cottages next to my house so that is £420 a year for the privilege of funding BBC, the most self satisfied and pointless organisation on the planet.
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 12 Nov 13 09:59
it's not a law it's an act,big difference.

Laugh

I'm afraid you seem to be confused between whether or not something is law, and whether or not a law is enforced.
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 12 Nov 13 10:01
They wrote back saying they had done the work and were very happy with how things are going

judo - C4 Racing are a perfect example of so many businesses in this country these days who think they are above finding out what their customers actually want. They'd rater pay big bucks to a marketing firm to produce a report telling them they're doing great. They then seem surprised when it all goes t*ts-up.
By:
Smar Tarse
When: 12 Nov 13 10:31
I know 2 households who don't pay for a tv licence every year but still watch all the tv channels in the uk including BBC. And they do this legally and in the full knowledge of the tv licensing people.

They just have to sign something every three years to say they don't watch any terrestrial tv as it is shown.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com