|
By:
btw was hibs partick game truly 32 for u q at ht? id have thought it would've been around 100!
|
|
By:
Cheers for the good luck wish and yeah I know what you are saying Tony Broke but I do think the method of laying any unquoted from any of the 7 or so games in section 7 on a bookie's sections list is quite safe, as the odds for both teams are very close and seem to be tight games. For example the game I mentioned last night for any unquoted at 90 mins was Oxford at 5/4 and Portsmouth at 7/4 and that ended 1-2 although I didn't actually end up doing it as I got sidetracked......Which must be about the only time someone has after-timed the other way.
![]() You do also have the option if following the game live to trade it out for a smaller loss if a few early goals go in too but that's why I also like laying 0-0 for games in section 1 of the sections list so as you know you have won as soon as a goal goes in, which might be within minutes but if it reaches HT at 0-0 then you have a decision to make to trade out or let it ride. I layed Celtic at 0-0 a few weeks back, let it ride at HT and they scored in the 88th minute from a direct free kick that hit the post and went in. I had a quick double check but yeah the odds were 32.0 for the Partick game. My stake was 8.08 as I doubled up because I'm doing it for someone else too with me. Fixtures 07 October / Partick v Hibernian / Half Time Score Any Unquoted Lay 30615805746 07-Oct-13 18:26 C 32 8.08 32 8.08 |
|
By:
on the football forum there is a backing at 1.05 thread which I posted on for some time with success up to 72 consecutive bets BUT one of the losses accrued eventually was backing u 3.5 at h t in the Europa game involving rubin, I know they weren't in theory playing another team where the game could be described as 'tight' but I thought this game was safe at ht, they did of course go on to win 4-0 and scored the 4th goal in the last minute.
The point im making, and I really enjoy reading threads such as yours because its using a strategy I would like to use myself, is, whenever you lay high scores or back for eg. u 3..5 etc there just seems to be far more stress involved when the goals go in, even one! at least tho when u lay 0-0 theres the entire game ...sods law dictates my backing of unders etc sees that darned red sus sign coming up after 2 mins! |
|
By:
as for horses have u laid any yet at 50? id never do this because if I laid a horse called 'slow fat-arsed equanine' with form of 00000000000 etc itd win by 10 lenths
|
|
By:
lol.. they does that don't them - the buglers
![]() |
|
By:
How's it going at the moment ima?
|
|
By:
The reality is, it is a stupid idea.
In saying that though, if you wish to do it, your call. If you are going to run a system though, where you wish to go all or nothing, then you need to bet the full amount each bet. That means, your initial bet at 2.10 pounds, is really working on the odds of ~50. But if your selection is actually 30, then you can put more on. Making you up a spreadsheet now. Will throw it on google docs when I am done. It will be set up the same way, you can use it the same as you asked. You can also use it to input your odds of the bet you wish to make and it will tell you your stake. It will also have a % of bank to risk if you wish to change it from 100%. |
|
By:
Done. PM sent with link to spreadsheet called "StuckInAMaze".
|
|
By:
"StuckInAMaze"
![]() Headstuckuparse would have been more appropriate. |
|
By:
TRD.Racing 08 Oct 13 17:56 Joined: 14 Apr 11 | Topic/replies: 7,451 | Blogger: TRD.Racing's blog
CT Just a little after timing there If i cant aftertime my thread then no one can talk about anything in the past SURELY? ![]() ![]() Just saying that this is similar to how i operate (although i use much much greater odds)And i have ridiculous success (yes i will big myself up because it is true)..And i have winning runs that produce 1000's x the stake each year and many times!!..Believe and more importantly Take the pith with your betting and have ridiculous boll0x when needed..That is the hardest part..Good luck.. |
|
By:
C'mon guys.
Is this for real? What kind of idiot would have an amazing run, win all that dosh only to lose every penny on a 50/1 nag. There are far better ways to do this sort of thing. For example why not use just 5% of your bank, yer it will take longer, but you would need 20 losers on the trot to lose your whole bank, and that prob aint gonna happen |
|
By:
If you did your maths properly you would realise you would need a whole lot more than 20 losers in a row to lose your bank if using 5% of bank per stake.
|
|
By:
ITS VERY GOOD READING EVEN FASCINATING IN PLACES ...BUT IT IS FLAWED ISNT IT WHEN U ARE AT A CERTAIN AMOUNT HOW DO YOU TAKE FRO E.G. 45K OUT OF A HORSE THATS 50 TO LAY ....OR ITS THE RED/BLACK SYSTEM YOU HAVE A POUND ON RED THEN 2 THEN 4 THEN 8 THEN 16 THEN 32 THEN 64 BUT BEFORE THEN U THINK IS IT WORTH IT ??.....WHEN YOU GET TO £ 4,666 OR WHATEVER DO YOU THINK I DONT WANT TO RISK THIS ANYMORE OR WORSE STILL U GET TO 67K AND U NOW THINK YOUVE GOT LIFE CHANGING AMOUNTS GOING ON DAY TO DAY ....INTRESTING BUT FLAWED
|
|
By:
BJT 15 Oct 13 04:11
Done. PM sent with link to spreadsheet called "StuckInAMaze". I have what i wanted now anyway but t all the same. THERE....IS....NO....SPOOOOON 15 Oct 13 06:43 "StuckInAMaze" Laugh Headstuckuparse would have been more appropriate. I'm getting worried about you becoming my stalker and bet you got a hard on when your saw I had started a thread eh? ![]() As I've said previously, I won't get anywhere near the 365 bets as I would bail out long before that anyway. ![]() |