Hugh Taylor

fraudy seething

Utterly irrelevant.

They all have their bad runs.

Has his share of winners and understands that each race is entirely different and their never will be a blueprint for picking winners.

possibly the only tipster i would take any notice off.
has a thankless task trying to pick value winners in the mornings these days,as the prices have collapsed the night before(go back out on hear later).
should jack atr in and go out on his own,or even join ruk.
he's just giving the bookies a excuse to shave 3/4 points at the moment.
did pick treve for the arc,but cannot put that type of selection up.(which he should)

Do people not realise how irrelevant a losing run is? Incredible.

So what?

He's a tipster not professional gambler what do you expect,he wouldn't want to rely on his betting for a living as i'm sure he'd probably admit there are far shrewder people out there.Nothing wriong with that but you see the lemmings coming out of the woodwork once he hits a losing run blown all previous profit and moaning!

I can assure you hugh taylor has no enormous bank in real money that's an absolute certainty!!

Irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant. FFS Fraudy change the record and learn a few more words. You boring repetitive man.

BlazingWalker     07 Oct 13 21:11 
last winner more aspen sept 20. lost 31pts since.
windsor_boy     07 Oct 13 21:12 
So what?


PMSL

Indeed artie. A thread for idiots in general. Moondan`s stupidity is particularly profound.

Windsor,

If you cut out the use of words like idiot, stupidity and clueless in your posts you wouldn't receive the constant flow of abuse you get on here. I'm sure you are capable of getting involved in reasonable debate, having said that your posting style indicates you have no interest in considering views other than your own.

Hugh's talked about long losing runs many times, it's just an inevitable part of backing the type of selection
he's interested in. He's a fantastic tipster and a real student of the game, you only have to read his column to
see that. However, he'd be the first person to tell you that the price is all important in his selections, I think
you need to be able to get around 80% of the price to make a long term profit. Unfortunately it's incredibly difficult
to achieve this as the price crashes less than a minute after it's published. If you do manage to get a selection at
the advised price, you wont be placing too many similar bets in the future with that firm. The column is definitely
a victim of it's own success from this perspective. You can get other people to open accounts for your use I guess,
change your ip address regularly etc etc, but if anyone suggests they are backing his selections regularly at advised
prices over a long period, they're delusional.

It's a difficult thing to do, make selections every day(especially when half the racing is low grade trash which is inevitably more unpredictable) and that's why you get long losing runs

I mostly bet in the price range 10/1 to 33/1 and manage to maintain a very decent strike and short losing runs... but that's because I am highly selective and only have a few bets a week in the big field handicaps etc

if I had to have a bet every day I'm sure my strike rate would suffer badly which is exactly why I don't even look at most of it

Losing runs are inevitable if you follow a tipster who is forced to tip every day

Good bloke is Hugh

Known him since alt.sports.horseracing days c. 15 years ago and a guy with more integrity and hard-work ethic you couldn't hope to find.

Any losing run he's on will be hurting him becaise of the people he thinks he'll be letting down - and he'll be grafting his crack off to turn it around.

fraudy and its partner at the races

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/picturesoftheday/5576935/Pictures-of-the-day-19-June-2009.html?image=2

how did u know i was talking about you fraudy and why do u answer immediately when someone calls you fraudy ?

thank you replying to your name fraudy when u r summoned