JAYSUS WILLOUGHBY

up to others....



but they wont do anything about it - ...


brilliant from willow

fair play to him there,well said.

hes perked up with the tannoy there... perhaps they have had a SE

Good on him. A lesser stable would be hauled in for that.

He can be very critical but it seems very often linked to the rides of horses he has tipped/backed.
Likewise he can be uncritical of moderate rides on horses beaten by ones he has tipped.
For example he did not criticise Mosse for going too early on Chrisellian preferring to eulogise Hughes on Chief Barker.

top of the class there from Willo not many would have had the b@lls to say what he did.

top of class from willo not many would have the b@lls to say what he did

I wont be patronised by a pseudo intellectual.

What ride was he talking about, I miss it.

3.35 johann strauss, easygold

love the way Oli wanted to brush it under the carpet

The Stewards held an enquiry into the running and riding of JOHANN STRAUSS, ridden by Joseph O’Brien and trained by Aiden O’Brien, which was restrained in last place before making an effort two furlongs out and running on to finish fourth beaten some 2¼ lengths. They interviewed the rider and the trainer. They also received a report from the Veterinary Officer. The rider stated his instructions were to drop the colt in and get him settled. Then once settled to get him to run and finish as close as he can, but the colt became unbalanced going down into the dip and did not pick up as he thought, until he met the rising ground. The trainer confirmed the instructions and was happy with the ride that was given. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race the Stewards noted their explanations.

shock horror what a surprise(thanx aiden but we have to show we look as tho we are doing something)

Ollie going over it now....

and moving on quickly

Thanks for posting Delta.

At least it will keep them amused on the flight back home.

I agreed with what he said that Barcalona should be replaced by Martin Lane.

Perhaps I am warming to him,    but thats stronging it a bit.

I'm decidedly still cold, as I had my forum privileges taken away for
a month, owing to a very fickle complaint from.... .a certain ruk presenter.

I am walking a very thin line so know what you mean, yet have never said anything insulting just stuck to the facts.
In fact its not unusual for him to insult the vast majority of punters when he calls them unsophisticated.

I've had three emails, two a/cs closed , and this one under orders
all emails and complaints relate to the same person. You can say what you like
about Thommo, he must av a hide like a rhinno.

Isit Hangus?

Willoughby is correct in all this. Pity though he continues to defend Spencer EVERY time he gives exactly the same ride.

oaklahoma city,prize money,£270,000 k,rpr 100+,johann strauss,£4k,mdn,get real.

his toofi nowhere.

he was against toofi.

the b lokes an absolute tool, more or less suggested any top rated front running stayer would win the melbourne cup because the aussie horses were non stayers who ran the race to suit themselves

For a man that studies form so much its very strange that his own form does not come under the same scrutiny, if he did he could only come to one conclusion.
Certainly his selections do not trouble the judge anymore than any other tom, dick, nor harry.

He did hit the nail on the head yesterday when he said the main objective is to win a few bob, or words to that effect.  Reality at last.

banging on ,and on about times, sectionals pace etc teed up by bell,the captain etc is certainly becoming tedious

I think it's sad that as the main horse racing forum, that supplies information,
opinions, views, exposure, brutally honest criticism, and exposure of tv pundits.
A genuine source for all types of information. From all types
of contributors, that exposes the bookmakers ruthless practices. The duplicity and compliance of the trade
paper, with the big books, and the complete lack of integrity from our sterile racing journalists.

The continuous sham appearances and misinformation from the bookie reps, that goes completely unchallenged
on the racing channels, for their combined commercial interests. The forum soon exposes the lies.

And all you have to do, or so it seems, is make a complaint, about the views of a poster, he is silenced, his views
discarded and banned, because of a ego, or a projected public image, of certain thin skinned individual. Who's pre race
views are regularly exposed as at best, well wide of the mark. I wonder how many informed posters have disappeared, for giving
honest views and opinions. It's not right.

Motley01

Your comment will never be bettered.

Spot on Motley.  Well put.

I've had a few blow outs with a quite a few on here. With posters who I would always read, and
respect, and with whom I wouldn't always agree with what they said, but I would always defend their
right to say it. I would never email in order to get them banned, never.

Willoughby is a class act who at least makes an attempt to think about the game rather than spout the usual glib cliches

There's a seat for every a.r.s.e

gravy train,rolls on.

He comes out with some gems, the trouble is they are fundamentally flawed.

More glass than class and easy to see through.

what did he say i missed it?

How refreshing it was, not to have em on today

You seem a troubled soul Motley.

Nothing troubling me whatsoever, all for expressing views on an open forum, without censure
I'm sure even you could support that. But I do seem to trouble your m8