Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
10 Sep 13
18:43
Joined:
Date Joined:
23 Jun 01
bumped close home ?
Show More
Shades of Moviesta (at Goodwood) there from Mulrennan, just direct one's mount across the track to take the opposition out 
beat a baw hair and looked as if he was closing to and about to go by,don't think they will change it though
Just LMFAO of pun man. Yeah, he eventually put his whip down - but not until he'd broadsided the runner-up...
poorp...where you getting odds from?? BF already paid out 
Sep 10, 2013 -- 6:51PM, tashkent terror wrote:
poorp...where you getting odds from?? BF already paid out
horse racing
gb
stewards
It's quite close to the finish, but his mount is already going to its left when PM decides to give it another smack with the whip in the right hand just prior to hampering the second.
ive backed it to keep the race, but the momentum was with the 2nd,
i think it would have got up.
i think it would have got up.
cheers guys...been on ere for years and never seen that market!! shocking 
ive traded out for a loss,
the winner is going to lose the race.
the winner is going to lose the race.
the guidelines state that the longer the SE goes on, the more likely the result should be allowed to stand
And of course for whatever reason the 'offender' is given the benefit of the doubt
And of course for whatever reason the 'offender' is given the benefit of the doubt
the SE is for the winner.
Why betfair settled winner market and not the placed market?
Why betfair settled winner market and not the placed market?
few amendments to be made now betfair 
He got away with it on Moviesta at Goodwood(G2, £50K), but his luck just ran out at Beverley.
2 DQs in 3 days
the bookie chappies won't be happy with that 'concession' they usually only pay out on rarely!
2 DQs in 3 days
the bookie chappies won't be happy with that 'concession' they usually only pay out on rarely!
Cant believe this. I put £30 on Fair Flutter in error at 20s.
Loses.
Gets turned round.
Cant believe my luck.
Loses.
Gets turned round.
Cant believe my luck.
Couldn't definitely say the 2nd would have won. Not consistent with other decisions imo.
RUK studio - why would they appeal?
Jockey fails to keep his mount straight / helps his mount on its way to its left where it hampers the second before holding on grimly by a sh hd?
Anyone know how many days Mulrennan got?
Jockey fails to keep his mount straight / helps his mount on its way to its left where it hampers the second before holding on grimly by a sh hd?
Anyone know how many days Mulrennan got?
6.40, fifth race
The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference shortly before the line. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, OCEAN STORM (IRE), ridden by Paul Mulrennan, had interfered with FAIR FLUTTER (IRE), placed second, ridden by Patrick Mathers, and that the interference had improved OCEAN STORM (IRE)’s placing. They placed FAIR FLUTTER (IRE), first, and OCEAN STORM (IRE), second. The Stewards found Mulrennan in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he had allowed his horse to drift left causing interference. They suspended him for 1 day as follows: Tuesday 24 September 2013.
The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference shortly before the line. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, OCEAN STORM (IRE), ridden by Paul Mulrennan, had interfered with FAIR FLUTTER (IRE), placed second, ridden by Patrick Mathers, and that the interference had improved OCEAN STORM (IRE)’s placing. They placed FAIR FLUTTER (IRE), first, and OCEAN STORM (IRE), second. The Stewards found Mulrennan in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he had allowed his horse to drift left causing interference. They suspended him for 1 day as follows: Tuesday 24 September 2013.
This was the stewards verdict after Mulrennan's ride on Moviesta at Goodwood -
They found Mulrennan in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he had allowed his mount to drift continuously left away from the whip without taking corrective action. They suspended him for 6 days as follows: Friday 16, Saturday 17, Sunday 18, Monday 19, Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 August 2013.
Perhaps they need a stronger deterrant cuz he was at it again this evening...
They found Mulrennan in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he had allowed his mount to drift continuously left away from the whip without taking corrective action. They suspended him for 6 days as follows: Friday 16, Saturday 17, Sunday 18, Monday 19, Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 August 2013.
Perhaps they need a stronger deterrant cuz he was at it again this evening...
It shouldn't be, dealer, and I don't think those are the rules 
As it happens, I actually think Ocean Storm was the best horse in the race - because we can apply Willo's theory of 'buying lengths cheaply' to what happened.
Ocean Storm put distance between himself and the opposition in the hottest part of the race, only to be nearly run down by a horse who 'bought' his ground cheaply as the leader started to pay the price for his earlier exertions.
However, we can't be allowing jockeys to think they can get away with failing to keep their mounts straight in a win at any cost mentality. OS was already on its way to its left when Mulrennan decided to help it on its way by getting another smack into it.
Ocean Storm put distance between himself and the opposition in the hottest part of the race, only to be nearly run down by a horse who 'bought' his ground cheaply as the leader started to pay the price for his earlier exertions.
However, we can't be allowing jockeys to think they can get away with failing to keep their mounts straight in a win at any cost mentality. OS was already on its way to its left when Mulrennan decided to help it on its way by getting another smack into it.
As it happens, I actually think Ocean Storm was the best horse in the race - because we can apply JW's theory of 'buying lengths cheaply' to what happened.
Ocean Storm put distance between himself and the opposition in the hottest part of the race, only to be nearly run down by a horse who 'bought' his ground cheaply as the leader started to pay the price for his earlier exertions.
However, we can't be allowing jockeys to think they can get away with failing to keep their mounts straight in a win at any cost mentality. OS was already on its way to its left when Mulrennan decided to help it on its way by getting another smack into it.
Ocean Storm put distance between himself and the opposition in the hottest part of the race, only to be nearly run down by a horse who 'bought' his ground cheaply as the leader started to pay the price for his earlier exertions.
However, we can't be allowing jockeys to think they can get away with failing to keep their mounts straight in a win at any cost mentality. OS was already on its way to its left when Mulrennan decided to help it on its way by getting another smack into it.
seems strange 6days to 1 days in what seems quite similar incidents.
What happened at Goodwood was a fecking disgrace imo. Anyone who backed the Gosden horse was robbed. Buick was unable to ride the horse out for the last half-furlong.
Similar situation in the Ebor last season with Dettori doing feck all to straighten his horse up before holding on by a small margin.
He got a 6 day ban but connections got to keep the 100K+ first prize
Similar situation in the Ebor last season with Dettori doing feck all to straighten his horse up before holding on by a small margin.
He got a 6 day ban but connections got to keep the 100K+ first prize
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539