There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Surely!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
|
By:
WTF they not calling a stewards??
|
|
By:
nothing doing
|
|
By:
If they dont call a stewards there i will be amazed
|
|
By:
did nothing wrong
 |
|
By:
the gap was never there, blame the jockey on the second not the winner, your all so bitter when you back a loser fair and square
|
|
By:
Not enough going on there to change the result, so why bother?
|
|
By:
the gap WAS there - interference was caused by BS coming to the rail - close decision here
|
|
By:
Stewards called now
|
|
By:
There was no gap because Fosters Road was already in there when he was interfered with.
|
|
By:
Objection
|
|
By:
Quite right.....
|
|
By:
objection
no chance |
|
By:
How do betfair get away with settling the market so quickly when a stewards was likely to be called - they then open a separate market and get commission twice
 |
|
By:
Agree AA.....Purple market showed "completed" nearly straight away
 |
|
By:
Result stands?
Ironic that the race happened to be called the "Guide Dogs For The Blind Handicap". |
|
By:
|
|
By:
To be fair AA, I think the stewards was down to an objection which took a while to be lodged.
|
|
By:
the two muppets on atr reviewed the race almost immediately after and both said a stewards would likely be called - the market was settled within 30 seconds of that.
|
|
By:
AA,
if Betfair took note of waffling muppets, no market would ever close. |