








) they didn't change their mind ! No I'm not new to betting just more focused now so my winning profile more in the spotlight I guess. Must have not gone down well that I successfully turned over my bonus when I joined. Call me naive but although I was aware they restricted accounts I though it was for really BIG players. I think ATR and Racing Post should "name and shame" those bookies who take it too far.





May 14, 2013 -- 1:51PM, Sportsadvisor wrote:
all you wingers on here, seem to forget if you can't get it on here- where you are constrained by appalling liquidity levels, its only then that you turn to bookmakers. and then very often for when we are out of line with the exchange. ie 9/2 when it's 4 on here and you expect to get a nice free arb off our backs.i do agree Hills and such have become rather pathetic about many bets they should not restrict, of course i agree there. But moist of the whining on here isn't from the genuine client- it's the traders bleating they can't make profits off the bookies backi don't see one complaint on this thread about why you can't get what you want on Betfair. oh nomight i suggest an afternoon at the cinema?
The life long question, of why you have something at 9/2 when it is 4 on here still remains.
If it is 4 on here and you are offering 4.50, it makes perfect sense to bet with you. You are advertising a price, wanting people to back at that price, and then closing down people that do bet at that price.
The day somebody with an IQ over 80 decides to become a bookie, the better for all of us.
May 15, 2013 -- 12:21AM, patrick starr wrote:just when the thread couldnt get any worse duke leches up and complains he cant get his arbs on,ffs.
you have obviously not read what i posted.i am not complaining about not getting my bets on to arb back on here.I STATED A FACT THAT A WELL KNOWN BOOK HAD ME ON MINIMUM STAKES BUT THAT HAS NOW BEEN LIFTED AND I AM NOW ON MAXIMUM STAKES hope that is CLEAR